Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Analisa FIKRI : Jurnal Kajian Agama, Sosial dan Budaya Analisa: Journal of Social Science and Religion
Abu Rokhmad
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Pandangan Kiai tentang Deradikalisasi Paham Islam Radikal di Kota Semarang Abu Rokhmad
Analisa: Journal of Social Science and Religion Vol 21, No 1 (2014): Analisa Journal of Social Science and Religion
Publisher : Balai Penelitian dan Pengembangan Agama Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18784/analisa.v21i1.25

Abstract

AbstractThe face of Islamic moderate in Indonesia changed since the decline of new era regime in 1998. Hardliner moslem communities grew in society. They didn’t embarrassed to use  violent ways, even terorism. Nowadays radicalism isthe most important problems faced bythe moslem society in Indonesia. The participation of kiai was badly needed to handle radicalism problems. This article studies the views of kiai about the roots of Islamic radicalsm and the strategies of kiai to deradicalize Islamic radicalism. The conclusion of this article were: first, the root of radicalism becaused of two factors: religius factor thatis literal understanding or misunderstanding of religious texts, and the political factor related to national and global issues. Second, there were two forms of deradicalization, related to the characteristics of the subject of radicalism: preventive deradicalization and curative deradicalization.Keywords: islamic radicalism, radicalism, deradicalization, kiai. AbstrakWajah Islam moderat di Indonesia kian berubah sejak rezim Orde Baru tumbang pada 1998. Kelompok-kelompok Muslim garis keras tumbuh subur di masyarakat. Mereka tidak segan berdakwah dengan cara kekerasan bahkan terorisme. Radikalisme menjadi masalah penting bagi umat Islam Indonesia dewasa ini. Keterlibatan kiaidalam menangani masalah radikalisme (deradikalisasi) sangat diharapkan. Artikel ini mengkaji dua hal. Pertama, bagaimana pandangan kiai tentang akar radikalisme Islam? dan Kedua, bagaimana strategi kiai dalam melakukan deradikalisasi pahamIslam radikal? Kesimpulan artikel ini adalah: Pertama, akar radikalisme disebabkan dua faktor besar, yaikni faktor pemahaman agama yang kurang tepat dan faktor politik yang berhubungan isu nasional dan global. Kedua,terdapat dua model deradikalisasi, tergantung sifat dari pelaku radikalisme: deradikalisasi pencegahan (preventive deradicalization), dan deradikalisasi penyembuhan (curative deradicalization).Kata kunci: Islam Radikal, Radikalisme, Deradikalisasi, Pesantren, Kiai.
Pandangan Kiai tentang Deradikalisasi Paham Islam Radikal di Kota Semarang Abu Rokhmad
Analisa: Journal of Social Science and Religion Vol 21, No 1 (2014): Analisa Journal of Social Science and Religion
Publisher : Balai Penelitian dan Pengembangan Agama Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (521.023 KB) | DOI: 10.18784/analisa.v21i1.25

Abstract

AbstractThe face of Islamic moderate in Indonesia changed since the decline of new era regime in 1998. Hardliner moslem communities grew in society. They didn’t embarrassed to use  violent ways, even terorism. Nowadays radicalism isthe most important problems faced bythe moslem society in Indonesia. The participation of kiai was badly needed to handle radicalism problems. This article studies the views of kiai about the roots of Islamic radicalsm and the strategies of kiai to deradicalize Islamic radicalism. The conclusion of this article were: first, the root of radicalism becaused of two factors: religius factor thatis literal understanding or misunderstanding of religious texts, and the political factor related to national and global issues. Second, there were two forms of deradicalization, related to the characteristics of the subject of radicalism: preventive deradicalization and curative deradicalization.Keywords: islamic radicalism, radicalism, deradicalization, kiai. AbstrakWajah Islam moderat di Indonesia kian berubah sejak rezim Orde Baru tumbang pada 1998. Kelompok-kelompok Muslim garis keras tumbuh subur di masyarakat. Mereka tidak segan berdakwah dengan cara kekerasan bahkan terorisme. Radikalisme menjadi masalah penting bagi umat Islam Indonesia dewasa ini. Keterlibatan kiaidalam menangani masalah radikalisme (deradikalisasi) sangat diharapkan. Artikel ini mengkaji dua hal. Pertama, bagaimana pandangan kiai tentang akar radikalisme Islam? dan Kedua, bagaimana strategi kiai dalam melakukan deradikalisasi pahamIslam radikal? Kesimpulan artikel ini adalah: Pertama, akar radikalisme disebabkan dua faktor besar, yaikni faktor pemahaman agama yang kurang tepat dan faktor politik yang berhubungan isu nasional dan global. Kedua,terdapat dua model deradikalisasi, tergantung sifat dari pelaku radikalisme: deradikalisasi pencegahan (preventive deradicalization), dan deradikalisasi penyembuhan (curative deradicalization).Kata kunci: Islam Radikal, Radikalisme, Deradikalisasi, Pesantren, Kiai.
The Purposes of Marriage and its Hierarchy according to Al-Ghazālī on the Iḥyā’ Ulūm al-Dīn based on Mubādalah Perspective Heru Susanto; Abdul Ghofur; Abu Rokhmad; Agustina Kumala Dewi Sholihah
Fikri : Jurnal Kajian Agama, Sosial dan Budaya Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): Fikri : Jurnal Kajian Agama, Sosial dan Budaya
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Ma'arif NU (IAIMNU) Metro Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25217/jf.v9i2.5132

Abstract

Al-Ghazālī is recognized as a distinguished scholar who adeptly integrates the principles of fiqh ‘Islamic jurisprudence’ with tasawwuf ‘Islamic mysticism’, achieving a balance between naqlī ‘transmitted knowledge’ and 'aqlī ‘rational knowledge’, as articulated in his seminal work, Iḥyā' 'Ulūm al-Dīn. However, his perspectives on women's issues, particularly regarding the purpose of marriage, have been characterized as non-moderate, prompting some scholars to label him a misogynist. This study aims to elucidate and analyze Al-Ghazālī's views on the purpose of marriage and its hierarchical structure through the lens of Mubādalah ‘reciprocity’. This research employs qualitative literature review methodologies supported by a philosophical framework. Primary data are sourced from Al-Ghazālī's works, namely Iḥyā' 'Ulūm al-Dīn and Kasr al-Shahwatain. Secondary data encompass a range of academic books, journal articles, and additional references that substantiate the research findings. The collected data are subjected to descriptive-analytical techniques for thorough review and analysis. The research outcomes indicate the following: First, Al-Ghazālī highlights the hierarchy of marriage purposes grounded in the levels of maqāṣid al-syarī’ah, which consist of ḍarūriyāt ‘necessities’, ḥājiyāt ‘needs’, and taḥsīniyāt ‘desirables’. Second, from the perspective of Mubādalah, Al-Ghazālī's views on the purpose of marriage, as presented in Iḥyā' 'Ulūm al-Dīn, do not align with the principles of Mubādalah and exhibit gender bias. This misalignment is evident in several aspects: (1) At the pre-marriage stage, Al-Ghazālī positions men as the decision-makers in the selection of a spouse, while women are relegated to the status of the chosen objects. (2) There exists an incongruity between the hierarchy of marriage goals from Al-Ghazālī's perspective and the principles of Mubādalah. (3) Al-Ghazālī delineates the husband-wife relationship within a superior-inferior framework. (4) He emphasizes the roles of women primarily within domestic spheres. Al-Ghazālī's views are undoubtedly shaped by the socio-historical context of his era, as well as his identity as a şūfi. This research aspires to contribute to the discourse surrounding the evolution of Islamic family law legislation, advocating for the recognition and safeguarding of women’s rights and roles in a more equitable manner.
Co-Authors Abdul Ghofur Agustina Kumala Dewi Sholihah Heru Susanto