Ogi Bahaurini Gumilar
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine/Airlangga University, Soetomo Hospital, Surabaya.

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

ORAL PHENAZOPYRIDINE HCL FOR URETER ORIFICE IDENTIFICATION AND RETROGRADE STENTING Gumilar, Ogi Bahaurini; Soebadi, Doddy M; Djojodimedjo, Tarmono; Askandar, Brahmana; Pudjirahardjo, Widodo J
Indonesian Journal of Urology Vol 22 No 1 (2015)
Publisher : Indonesian Urological Association

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32421/juri.v22i1.179

Abstract

Objective:  To compare the successful of the identification of the ureteral orifice at cervical cancer patients who received phenazopyridine orally and to analyze the correlation between hydronephrosis and successful rate for retrograde stenting. Material & Method: This was a comparative experimental study, using phenazopyridine hcl orally prior to cystoscopy to identify the ureteral orifice on cervical cancer patients and to perform retrograde stenting on spotted ureteral orifice. Forty samples provided consent to enroll in this study. Mean age was 49.2 ± 5.16 years. Thirty-four out of 40 samples was confirmed as squamous cell carcinoma type. Results: Chi-square test demonstrated no significant differentiation in finding ureteral orifice between treatment and control group on stage 3B (p = 0.408). However, result shown conversely on stage 4A (p = 0.046). There was no significant disparity in conducting retrograde stenting between treatment and control group on stage 2B and 3B (p = 0.221 and p = 0.197). There was no significant correlation between hydronephrosis gradation and retrograde stenting on control group (p = 0.144). Conclusion: Administration of phenazopyridine HCL orally in cervical cancer patients increase success for ureteral orifice identification and retrograde stenting, but not statistically significant. There is no correlation between hydronephrosis with a success retrograde stenting.Keywords: Cervical cancer, hydronephrosis, phenazopyridine hcl, ureteral orifice, retrograde stenting.
URETHRAL INJURY AS A RARE COMPLICATION OF CIRCUMCISION: A CASE REPORT AND LITERATURE REVIEW Suwarno, Budi; Gumilar, Ogi Bahaurini; Rozidi, Achmad Romy Syahrial; Zharfan, Rahmat Sayyid
Indonesian Journal of Urology Vol 29 No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Indonesian Urological Association

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32421/juri.v29i2.764

Abstract

Objective: In this report, we describe the case of urethral injuries after circumcision. Case(s) Presentation: A 5-year-old male came to the urology clinic complaining of urine seeping through the gauze-covered wound. The patient had undergone circumcision. Before the procedure, the patient could generally urinate through the external urethral orifice. His parent realized that the urine was flowing out through the circumcision scar instead of the external orifice. Even though the wound was open and wet, he felt painless when urinating. After cleaning the wound, it appeared that there was a sizeable chromic catgut thread knotted on the right corpus cavernosum. The pendular urethra was cut widely; therefore, the urine came out of this spot. A six French Foley catheter was inserted over the external urethral orifice, the cut urethra towards the bladder. The injured urethra was expected to be attached to simplify the next six-month operation by inserting this urinary catheter. Discussion: Urethral injury post circumcision is rarely reported, but this complication is dangerous due to its morbidity and long-term impact. The paradigm shift from two-stage repair to one-stage repair has developed. Mathieu’s modified technique and the Snodgrass technique are recommended. Conclusion: Urethral injury during circumcision can be devastating. The repair technique for urethral trauma depends on the involvement and condition of the surrounding soft tissue, also the size of the tissue damage.