Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.882
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal AEGIS : Journal of International Relations International Journal of Social Service and Research Journal of Government Science Studies Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Jurnal Kajian Stratejik Ketahanan Nasional HUMANUS : Jurnal Sosiohumaniora Nusantara
Hamka Hendra Noer, Hamka Hendra
Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta
Religion Aerospace Engineering Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Neuroscience Social Sciences Other

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : AEGIS : Journal of International Relations

 1 
PATOLOGI KELEMBAGAAN DEMOKRASI ELEKTORAL: KORUPSI POLITIK DI INDONESIA PASCA-REFORMASI Noer, Hamka Hendra
AEGIS : Journal of International Relations Vol 9, No 1 (2025)
Publisher : President University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33021/aegis.v9i1.6285

Abstract

The 1998 Reformasi represents a pivotal shift in Indonesia's political evolution, directing the nation towards electoral democracy with aspirations for transparent and accountable governance. However, this transition has paradoxically entrenched political corruption within the democratic framework rather than mitigating it. This article investigates political corruption as an institutional pathology inherent in electoral democracy, highlighting the influences of weak institutions, dependency on patronage, and a deficiency in political ethics that foster transactional practices within procedural democracy. The theoretical framework used is derived from Nye, Friedrich, and Philp, who conceptualize corruption as a socio-political phenomenon that surpasses legalistic definitions. A comparative analysis between developed and semi-democratic nations illustrates that the effectiveness of democracy in combating corruption is significantly contingent upon institutional consolidation, a deliberative political culture, and the presence of robust checks and balances. The findings suggest that post-Reformation of Indonesian democracy continues to grapple with issues of money politics, insufficient transparency in party financing, and weak accountability among political elites. The article argues that without comprehensive reforms—including enhanced regulatory measures, education in political ethics, and the empowerment of civil society—democracy risks degenerating into mere proceduralism that legitimizes corruption. This study contributes to the broader discourse on the intricate relationship between electoral democracy and corruption in developing countries.
Co-Authors Budiman, Achmad Zahir Setra, Raka Yudi