Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Veritas et Justitia Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan)
Nefa Claudia Meliala, Nefa Claudia
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Katolik Parahyangan
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
PENDEKATAN KEADILAN RESTORATIF: UPAYA MELIBATKAN PARTISIPASI KORBAN DAN PELAKU SECARA LANGSUNG DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PIDANA Meliala, Nefa Claudia
Veritas et Justitia Vol 1, No 1 (2015)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Chatolic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

AbstractFrom our understanding of ius poenale and ius puniendi, crime logically is simply considered as any offense directed against the state. In other words, conflict between offender and the State. It follow that justice is related to number of cases processed and punishment served. From this perspective, the criminal justice system disregards victims’ and offenders’s needs for closure and personal justice.  The restorative justice system offers an alternate approach which may compensate the shortcomings of the existing criminal justice system that is by opening up the possibility of victims and offenders participation.
PENDEKATAN KEADILAN RESTORATIF: UPAYA MELIBATKAN PARTISIPASI KORBAN DAN PELAKU SECARA LANGSUNG DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PIDANA Meliala, Nefa Claudia
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 1 No. 1 (2015): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v1i1.1419

Abstract

AbstractFrom our understanding of ius poenale and ius puniendi, crime logically is simply considered as any offense directed against the state. In other words, conflict between offender and the State. It follow that justice is related to number of cases processed and punishment served. From this perspective, the criminal justice system disregards victims’ and offenders’s needs for closure and personal justice.  The restorative justice system offers an alternate approach which may compensate the shortcomings of the existing criminal justice system that is by opening up the possibility of victims and offenders participation.
Rechterlijk Pardon (Pemaafan Hakim) : Suatu Upaya Menuju Sistem Peradilan Pidana Dengan Paradigma Keadilan Restoratif Nefa Claudia Meliala
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 8, No 3: December 2020 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v8i3.820

Abstract

Tulisan ini akan secara spesifik membahas mengenai pengaturan rechterlijk pardon (pemaafan hakim) dalam RKUHP sebagai salah satu bentuk pendekatan keadilan restoratif yang pada prinsipnya mencoba untuk menghindari penjatuhan pidana penjara sejauh hal tersebut dimungkinkan, terutama untuk pidana perampasan kemerdekaan jangka pendek dalam kasus-kasus tindak pidana ringan. Selain itu, lembaga ini juga pada prinsipnya berfungsi untuk melakukan koreksi terhadap kekakuan dari asas legalitas. Persoalan lain yang kemudian juga harus diperhatikan adalah RKUHP perlu mengurai secara lebih rinci kriteria yang harus terpenuhi agar putusan pemaafan hakim dapat dijatuhkan dalam suatu perkara. Upaya pembaharuan hukum pidana materil melalui pengaturan rechterlijk pardon (pemaafan hakim) dalam RKUHP ini juga harus disikronisasi dengan pengaturan hukum acara pidana dalam Rancangan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (RKUHAP) agar pengaturan rechterlijk pardon (pemaafan hakim) dalam RKUHP tidak menjadi sesuatu yang percuma. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penulisan ini adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif. Sehubungan dengan metode penelitian hukum normatif yang digunakan, jenis data yang digunakan untuk menjawab pertanyaan dalam penelitian ini adalah data sekunder yang dikumpulkan melalui studi kepustakaan (studi literatur) yang dalam hal ini akan menjadi bahan utama. 
PENDEKATAN KEADILAN RESTORATIF: UPAYA MELIBATKAN PARTISIPASI KORBAN DAN PELAKU SECARA LANGSUNG DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PIDANA Meliala, Nefa Claudia
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 1 No. 1 (2015): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v1i1.1419

Abstract

AbstractFrom our understanding of ius poenale and ius puniendi, crime logically is simply considered as any offense directed against the state. In other words, conflict between offender and the State. It follow that justice is related to number of cases processed and punishment served. From this perspective, the criminal justice system disregards victims’ and offenders’s needs for closure and personal justice.  The restorative justice system offers an alternate approach which may compensate the shortcomings of the existing criminal justice system that is by opening up the possibility of victims and offenders participation.
PENGATURAN MODEL PERAMPASAN ASET TANPA PEMIDANAAN UNTUK TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI YANG MERUGIKAN KEUANGAN NEGARA Nefa Claudia Meliala
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v12i1.9691

Abstract

The recovery of assets derived from corruption remains a significant challenge within Indonesia's criminal justice system, particularly where conventional confiscation mechanisms depend upon a prior criminal conviction. This limitation often hinders efforts to restore state financial losses arising from corruption offences. Against this background, this article examines the urgency of adopting a Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture (NCB Asset Forfeiture) regime as an alternative mechanism for asset recovery in corruption cases. This research employs normative legal research methods based on qualitative analysis of secondary data consisting of primary legal materials, including legislation, ratified international conventions, and draft legislation, as well as secondary legal materials such as books, journal articles, and other scholarly works. The research is further supported by empirical findings contained in the Corruption Trend Monitoring Reports published by Indonesia Corruption Watch from 2018 to 2024. The study finds that the existing conviction-based asset forfeiture model under Indonesian positive criminal law is inadequate to address the complexities of corruption and the recovery of illicit assets. Consequently, the regulation of NCB Asset Forfeiture has become increasingly urgent to strengthen asset recovery mechanisms and improve the restoration of state financial losses caused by corruption offences.
Co-Authors