Maftuh Effendi, Maftuh
Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Semarang

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

USULAN RUMUSAN HUKUM ACARA (IUS CONSTITUENDUM) PENGUJIAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN DI BAWAH UNDANG-UNDANG OLEH MAHKAMAH AGUNG Effendi, Maftuh; Cahya Indra Permana, Tri
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol 25, No 1, June 2018
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jmh.2018.0099.31-39

Abstract

The implementation of juridical control of the legislation under the law by the Supreme Court through judicial review until nowadays was not running optimally. One of the causes of the less optimal quality of the decision to test regulations under the law was the absence of procedural law for the testing of material test rights that can accommodate the needs of the proceedings. These article wishes to propose a number of ideas so that in the future the MA will begin to discuss the procedural law for the testing of laws and regulations under the Act through trials that were open to the public. This is based on the principle that disputes in the laws and regulations under the Act not only examine juridical aspects, but also facts, and the decisions are final and binding, so that they have a broad impact on the public. Therefore, it is necessary to develop material on the contents of the procedural law for the testing of laws and regulations under a law that reflects the principle of fairness in order to increase public trust.
USULAN RUMUSAN HUKUM ACARA (IUS CONSTITUENDUM) PENGUJIAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN DI BAWAH UNDANG-UNDANG OLEH MAHKAMAH AGUNG Effendi, Maftuh; Cahya Indra Permana, Tri
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol 25, No 1, June 2018
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jmh.2018.0099.31-39

Abstract

The implementation of juridical control of the legislation under the law by the Supreme Court through judicial review until nowadays was not running optimally. One of the causes of the less optimal quality of the decision to test regulations under the law was the absence of procedural law for the testing of material test rights that can accommodate the needs of the proceedings. These article wishes to propose a number of ideas so that in the future the MA will begin to discuss the procedural law for the testing of laws and regulations under the Act through trials that were open to the public. This is based on the principle that disputes in the laws and regulations under the Act not only examine juridical aspects, but also facts, and the decisions are final and binding, so that they have a broad impact on the public. Therefore, it is necessary to develop material on the contents of the procedural law for the testing of laws and regulations under a law that reflects the principle of fairness in order to increase public trust.
PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA INDONESIA SUATU PEMIKIRAN KE ARAH PERLUASAN KOMPETENSI PASCA AMANDEMEN KEDUA UNDANG-UNDANG PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA Effendi, Maftuh
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 3 No 1 (2014)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.3.1.2014.25-36

Abstract

Indonesian administrative courts’ absolute jurisdiction are limited to the administrative decisions. It leads the courts as a special administrative court, even a “very special court”, because such definition of administrative decisions laid down on Law on Administrative Court is more narrow compared to the definition of administrative decision as laid down on the General Administrative Law Act of the Netherlands as it source. Most court decisions on the courts’ absolute jurisdiction vary in interpretations that make them unpredictable. They cause uncertainty and inconsistency in the application of administrative courts’ absolute jurisdiction. Furthermore, they create confusion to the society looking for appropriate forum dealing with administrative acts and bafflement to the administrations executing courts’ decisions. The concept offered to the expansion of Indonesian administrative courts’ absolute jurisdiction are based on the method and determination of administrative disputes. Method used is general method, while determination used is subjective and objective determinations. Subjective determination includes external and internal disputes, while objective determination includes all administrative acts in the field of public laws covered the legal and factual acts causing material or immaterial damages. Keywords: administrative courts, absolute jurisdiction, expansion.