Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan
Edi Hudiata, Edi
Unknown Affiliation
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
REKONSTRUKSI HUKUM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PASAR MODAL SYARIAH: PENGUATAN ASPEK REGULASI UNTUK MEMBERIKAN KEPASTIAN HUKUM Hudiata, Edi
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 6 No 2 (2017)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.6.2.2017.297-316

Abstract

The regulation of the Islamic capital market following the rules contained in Law 8/1995 on Capital Market, DSN MUI Fatwa No. 40 / IX / 2003, Bapepam-LK Number IX.A.13, No. IX.A.14, and No. II. K.1 From that rules, nothing has clearly set the Islamic capital market dispute resolution, both litigation and non-litigation resulting in a legal vacuum (leemten in het recht). Islamic economic dispute settlement provisions, including the dispute over the Islamic capital market, is only found in Law 3/2006. Through quantitative research methods, the study sought to harmonize the empty rules at the same time filling thus legal vacuum. The research concluded that the settlement litigation of disputes in Islamic capital markets settled in the Religious Court, while in non-litigation resolved through BASYARNAS (National Sharia Arbitration Board) and / or as other civil disputes can also be resolved through Alternative Dispute Resolution in accordance with Law 30/1999.Keywords: legal vacuum, the Islamic capital market.
ASAS KEPASTIAN HUKUM DAN ASAS KEBEBASAN BERKONTRAK SEBAGAI PERTIMBANGAN UTAMA DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERBANKAN SYARIAH (Kajian Yuridis Putusan MK Nomor 93/PUU-X/2012) Hudiata, Edi
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 3 No 1 (2014)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.3.1.2014.69-84

Abstract

Since the verdict of the Constitutional Court (MK) Number 93/PUU-X/2012 pronounced on Thursday, August 29, 2013, concerning the judicial review of Law No. 21 of 2008 on Islamic Banking, it is no longer dualism dispute resolution. The verdict as well as strengthen the jurisdiction of Religious Court to resolve Islamic banking disputes. In consideration of the judges, judges agreed stating that Article 55 paragraph (2) and (3) of Law No. 21 of 2008 which is an ideal norm, contains no constitutional problems. The problem is the explanation of the constitutional article 55 paragraph (2) of the Act. The emergence of the Constitutional Court verdict No. 93/PUU-X/2012 which substantially states that the explanation of Article 55 paragraph (2) of Law No. 21 of 2008 does not have binding force, basically does not violate the principle of freedom of contract which is common in contract law. The parties are allowed to make a dispute resolution agreement out of religious court based on provisions as Act No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution. Keywords: dispute resolution, legal certainty and the principle of freedom of contract
Co-Authors