Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Berkala Arkeologi Berkala Arkeologi
Edi Triharyantoro
Balai Pelestarian Peninggalan Purbakala Samarinda Wilayah Kerja Kalimantan
Earth & Planetary Sciences Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
KAJIAN PRAKTIS PENILAIAN BENDA CAGAR BUDAYA LOGAM (DALAM PENENTUAN IMBALAN JASA) Edi Triharyantoro
Berkala Arkeologi Vol 30 No 2 (2010)
Publisher : Balai Arkeologi Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (2000.634 KB) | DOI: 10.30883/jba.v30i2.404

Abstract

Value assesment of metal artifacts for compensation is problematic in heritage management. In Indonesia, there is no guideline to value a metal artifact and archaeological offices use different standard to determine the value metal artifacts. This has been seen as unjust among the society. In this paper, three essential aspects are proposed to be used in interpreting and identifying metal artifacts for compensation: context, rarity, and age. These three aspects are “inner considerations”. Along side with those aspects, we need to also consider other two “outer considerations”, i.e. present standard price for metal and collector's price. Combining those inner and outer considerations will help greatly to determine the value of metal artifacts for compensation.
KAJIAN PRAKTIS PENILAIAN BENDA CAGAR BUDAYA LOGAM (DALAM PENENTUAN IMBALAN JASA) Edi Triharyantoro
Berkala Arkeologi Vol. 30 No. 2 (2010)
Publisher : BRIN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30883/jba.v30i2.404

Abstract

Value assesment of metal artifacts for compensation is problematic in heritage management. In Indonesia, there is no guideline to value a metal artifact and archaeological offices use different standard to determine the value metal artifacts. This has been seen as unjust among the society. In this paper, three essential aspects are proposed to be used in interpreting and identifying metal artifacts for compensation: context, rarity, and age. These three aspects are “inner considerationsâ€. Along side with those aspects, we need to also consider other two “outer considerationsâ€, i.e. present standard price for metal and collector's price. Combining those inner and outer considerations will help greatly to determine the value of metal artifacts for compensation.
Co-Authors