p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pijar MIPA
Sri Subarinah
Mathematics Education Departement, Faculty of Teacher and Training Education, University of Mataram

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analysis of mathematical investigation ability reviewed from personality types in Junior High School Caesarla Elintang Yolawati; Sri Subarinah; Amrullah Amrullah; Nyoman Sridana
Jurnal Pijar Mipa Vol. 17 No. 4 (2022): July 2022
Publisher : Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (283.23 KB) | DOI: 10.29303/jpm.v17i4.3390

Abstract

Mathematical investigative ability is one of the skills that need to be honed in every student to improve problem-solving skills and develop thinking skills. A mathematical investigation has four stages: specialization, conjecture, justification, and generalization. This paper aims to describe the mathematical investigative abilities of extroverted and introverted personality students. This study was conducted qualitatively on Junior High School 1 Mataram students in grades IX-F, selected by a simple random sampling technique. Based on the mathematical investigation test results and personality type, 6 students were selected to be interviewed. The results showed that extrovert students were alert, independent, and outward-looking or oriented when doing mathematical investigation tests, such as directly working on questions deftly and trying out their ideas. Therefore, students with extrovert personalities mostly succeeded in going through three stages of an investigation, namely: specialization, conjecture, and justification. Introvert personality students, when doing mathematical investigations, are thorough, detailed, focused, and think deeply, such as checking answers by doing one more time, then rereading the answers in detail, and focusing on thinking deeply at the generalization stage. Therefore, most introverted students passed three stages of mathematical investigation: specialization, conjecture, and justification. However, some introverted students also made it through the fourth stage.
Analysis of mathematics problem-solving ability on plane figure subject based on van hieles theory at Junior High School Deanti Ramadhania; Sudi Prayitno; Sri Subarinah; Arjudin Arjudin
Jurnal Pijar Mipa Vol. 17 No. 4 (2022): July 2022
Publisher : Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (239.791 KB) | DOI: 10.29303/jpm.v17i4.3413

Abstract

This study aims to describe the ability to solve mathematical problems in Plane Figure Subject based on van Hiele's theory in class VIII students of SMP Negeri 1 Mataram in the academic year 2021/2022. The type of research used is descriptive qualitative, which produces data in the form of written or spoken words from people and observed behavior. The subjects in this study were students in class VIII-E at SMP Negeri 1 Mataram, totaling 36 students. The method of taking the subject in this study used purposive sampling, which was selected based on the objectives to be achieved. The data collection methods used are the van Hiele test and the flat wake problem-solving ability test, interviews, and documentation. The thinking level of students in taking the van Hiele test was: 20 students at level 0 (visualization) with a percentage of 55.56%, 13 students at level 1 (analysis) with a percentage of 36.11%, and 3 students at level 2 (informal deduction) with a percentage of 8.33%. Furthermore, students at each level of van Hiele's thinking were taken as representatives of each of the 2 subjects to carry out a problem-solving ability test. Based on the results of the research on the problem-solving abilities of students based on the Polya problem-solving stage, students who are at level 0 can understand the problem but have not been able to carry out the other Polya-solving stages. Students at level 1 can understand the problem and develop a settlement plan but have not been able to carry out the other stages of Polya solving. Students at the level can understand the problem, develop a settlement plan, and carry out a settlement plan but have not been able to re-examine. It shows that the higher the van Hiele thinking level of the students, the better their problem-solving abilities will be.