Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal Engineering and Applied Technology (IJEAT)
Niels vuegen
Hogeschool/University college PXL
Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Mechanical Engineering

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
EVALUATION LIFETIME SERVICE AND CAPACITY OF THE KADUMALIK DAM RESERVOIR Utamy Sukmayu Saputri; Yuli Suharnoto; Asep Sapei; Niels vuegen
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ENGINEERING AND APPLIED TECHNOLOGY (IJEAT) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): International Journal of Engineering and Applied Technology (IJEAT)
Publisher : Nusa Putra University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (952.031 KB) | DOI: 10.52005/ijeat.v5i1.57

Abstract

The dam is a construction of water structures built across the river. The function of the dam is to hold and store water, both rain water, river water and water from the lake which will then form a reservoir. Kadumalik Dam is one of the projects of the Directorate General of Water Resources (SDA) of the Ministry of Public Works and Public Housing (PUPR) which will be built in 2020 on an area of 500 Ha. The purpose of building Kadumalik Dam is to meet the irrigation needs of the Irrigation Area (D.I) and meet diverse water needs, but the dam can also pose a great risk as well, namely the risk of accumulation of sedimentation. Sedimentation is one of the factors that is very influential in dam management. A large sedimentation rate will speed up the service life of the reservoir so that the planned reservoir function can be disrupted. Therefore this research is important to know how much the dam capacity and how old the dam service. This study uses analytical calculation methods for sediment transport based on observations and calculation methods with efforts to handle sedimentation. Based on the results of the analysis, the sedimentation rate in the Kadumalik Reservoir is 2.71 tons / ha / year and is classified as an erosion hazard class I or very light erosion rate, calculation of the method with sedimentation handling measures results in the analysis of the Sediment Control Building (BPS) can control 2.2 million m3 of sediment, so that it can extend the reservoir service life to 50 years.
Design of reinforced concrete truss systems in earthquake-resistant high-rise buildings Paikun; Pirmansyah; Cece Suhendi; Triono; Niels vuegen
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ENGINEERING AND APPLIED TECHNOLOGY (IJEAT) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021): International Journal of Engineering and Applied Technology (IJEAT)
Publisher : Nusa Putra University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1369.131 KB) | DOI: 10.52005/ijeat.v4i2.60

Abstract

This study aims to find out how to plan the Reinforced Concrete Bar Frame Structure which includes the structure of columns and beams and their reinforcement to meet the design concept of capacity, namely strong columns and weak beams. In this study, it will be planned on the Nusa Putra Islamic Boarding School building which amounts to 3 floors using the Special Moment Resistant Frame System (SRPMK) in accordance with SNI-2847-2013 and SNI-1726-2012. The earthquake load used is Spectrum Response Analysis by taking into account three different types of soil conditions namely hard, medium and soft soils. Moment Resistant Frame System is a spatial frame system in which structural components and their joints resist forces acting through bending, sliding and axial action. The quality of the concrete material used is 25 MPa and the reinforcing steel material used 400 MPa threaded iron while the beam dimensions are 300 mm x 400 mm and the column is 500 mm x 500 mm. The results obtained on the beam structure in hard soil conditions Mu = -85.5012 kN (support for) 4D19; Mu = 42.7506 kN (pedestal under) used 3D16; and Mu = 30,2581 kN (in the middle span) used 3D16; on medium soil Mu = 92.0741 kN (support for) 4D19; Mu = 46.03705 kN (lower pedestal) used 3D16; and Mu = 59.4276 kN (center span) used 3D16 + 1D13; on soft soil Mu = -107,842 kN (upper support) 5D19 was used; Mu = 53,921 kN (pedestal under) used 4D16; and Mu = 63.4546 kN (center span) used 4D16; Axial force occurs in the main column due to the combination of the three types of soil is not too significantly different, on hard soil = 337,949 kN, medium soil = 339,785 kN, soft soil = 342,954 kN, so column reinforcement in all three uses 12D22
Co-Authors Asep Sapei Paikun Pirmansyah Saputri, Utamy Sukmayu Suhendi, Cece Triono Yuli Suharnoto