Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL COMPUTATIONAL AND MANUFACTURING RESEARCH
M. Yoki Al Mahir
University of North Sumatra
Automotive Engineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Control & Systems Engineering Electrical & Electronics Engineering Mechanical Engineering

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Performance Analysis of Three Channel Single Pass Heat Exchanger With Flow Divided In Counterclockwise and Unidirectional Flow Configurations M. Yoki Al Mahir
International Journal of Mechanical Computational and Manufacturing Research Vol. 10 No. 2 (2021): August: Mechanical Computational And Manufacturing Research
Publisher : Trigin Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (423.368 KB)

Abstract

The triple concentric pipes heat exchanger is an improved or the repair version of double pipe heat exchanger. The research of triple concentric pipe heat exchanger have enough developed, especially by C.L.Ko dan G.L. Wedekind who have given theoretically and experimentally analysis. This research was conducted to determine the output of temperature of each channel and find out perfomance heat exchanger effectiveness is based on experimentally and theoretically. In this essay, the development is doing with a broader scope of research C.L. Ko and G.L. Wedekind, the experiment have done with C1/Cs ≤ 1 and C1/Cs ≥ 1 in both counter flow and paralel flow configuration aheat exchan ger used according to the size used C.L. Ko and G.L. Wedekind. The result experiment that average effectiveness is ± 60% with the higgest effectiveness is ± 80.4 % in counter flow configuration and the average effectiveness is ± 43.4% with the higgest effectiveness is ± 55.1 % in paralel flow configuration. Theoretically predicted heat exchanger effectiveness are found on the average different of the experiment ± 9,06% in counter flow configuration and 5,67% in paralel flow configuration. The experiment also show different result of optimum point that predicted by C.L.Ko dan G.L. Wedekind.
Co-Authors