Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Dobo Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pemilu Elia Rumangun, Johan Pieter; Wadjo, Hadibah Zachra; Patiasina, Pieter H
Bacarita Law Journal Vol 4 No 2 (2024): April 2024 BACARITA Law Journal
Publisher : Programs Study Outside the Main Campus in Law Pattimura University ARU Islands Regency

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30598/bacarita.v4i2.12176

Abstract

In its development, general election crimes in Indonesia have experienced many changes, both in the form of increasing types of criminal acts and differences in the addition of criminal sanctions. This is because every day, election crimes are becoming a very serious concern because the measure of a democratic country's success is seen from its success in holding elections. The aim of this research is to examine and analyze the basic considerations of Dobo District Court judges in imposing fines on perpetrators of criminal acts, and the Dobo District Court Decision Number 60/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Dob can have a deterrent effect on defendants who commit election crimes. This type of research is normative juridical in nature. The research type is descriptive-analytical. Sources of legal materials use primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. Techniques for collecting legal materials through literature study and qualitative analysis of legal materials. The research results show that the basis for the judge's consideration in imposing a fine in court decision Number 60/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Dob is because the judge considers both juridical and non-juridical considerations. Juridically, the defendant's actions could harm other people, while non-juridically, the defendant was cooperative and polite, thereby making the trial run smoothly and the defendant has never been punished. all of which cannot be separated from the indictments and demands filed by the public prosecutor with a single charge of election crimes. And in the decision of the Dobo District Court Number 60/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Dob it does not have a deterrent effect on defendants who commit election crimes because fines can only be felt by poor people, but in essence these fines do not applies to the perpetrator in this case because the perpetrator of the election crime is the Chairman of the Aru Islands Regency DPRD who of course is economically capable of carrying out a fine, therefore the fine expected in this decision does not have a deterrent effect.
Penetapan Tersangka Tindak Pidana Narkotika Terhadap Anggota Polri Tanpa Adanya Barang Bukti Rumangun, Johan Pieter Elia
PATTIMURA Legal Journal Vol 3 No 2 (2024): Agustus 2024 PATTIMURA Legal Journal
Publisher : Postgraduate Program Doctoral in Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/pela.v3i2.16437

Abstract

Introduction: Determining a suspect for a narcotics crime against a member of the National Police without any evidence is a complex and sensitive legal issue. Purposes of the Research: This case highlights the procedures for determining suspects in a law enforcement environment, where the integrity and public trust in the National Police institution is at stake. Methods of the Research: This type of research is normative juridical in nature. The research type is descriptive-analytical. Sources of legal materials use primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. Techniques for collecting legal materials through literature study and qualitative analysis of legal materials. Results Originality of the Research: The research results show that although physical evidence is very important in enforcing criminal law, the determination of suspects can be carried out based on digital evidence or other adequate information, provided that strict legal procedures are followed to ensure fairness and transparency. However, determining suspects without physical evidence against members of the National Police must be carried out very carefully to avoid the appearance of abuse of authority or actions that could harm the image of the police.
“Kaya Tapi Miskin” (Sebuah Analisis Kritis Atas Persoalan Kemiskinan di Aru yang Berbanding Terbalik dengan Potensi Kekayaan Hasil Laut Aru) Johan Pieter Elia Rumangun
AURELIA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): December 2022
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/aurelia.v1i2.111

Abstract

AbstrakWilayah-wilayah terpencil dan tergolong sebagai wilayah perbatasan seringkali menjadi wilayah yang rentan akan kemajuan sosial dan kurang terjamah oleh pembangunan nasional. Hal ini dikarenakan sulitnya akses pemerintah untuk menjangkau wilayah-wilayah yang tergolong sebagai wilayah perbatasan sehingga sentralisasi pembangunan nasional hanya terfokus pada wilayah perkotaan (wilayah urban). Sementara wilayah perbatasan atau wilayah terpencil kemudian terbaikan dan jauh dari perhatian pemerintah. Berbagai kebijakan-kebijakan yang dilakukan oleh pemerintah pun seringkali tidak menyentuh nasib masyarakat pada wilayah-wilayah perbatasan. Tidak heran bila kerapkali wilayah perbatasan dilabeli dengan label wilayah tertinggal. Ketertinggalan ini nampak dalam berbagai bidang kehidupan seperti minimnya pendidikan, rendahnya infrakstruktur, buruknya perekonomian masyarakat. Akibatnya tingkat kemiskinan di wilayah-wilayah perbatasan pun kerap mengalami peningkatan. Padahal sumber daya alam wilayah-wilayah pesisir amatlah kaya. Hanya saja, kebijakan-kebijakan pemerintah bagi kesejahteraan seluruh masyarakat Indonesia seringkali tidak menjangkau kesejahteraan masyarakat di wilayah terpencil. Termasuk Aru. Dengan demikian, diskusi dalam tulisan ini akan berfokus pada analisa mengenai fenomena kemiskinan masyarakat pesisir pantai di Aru yang berbanding terbalik dengan kekayaan hasil laut Aru untuk kemudian melihat sejauh mana peran pemerintah daerah dalam menanggulangi masalah kemiskinan di Aru.Kata Kunci: Pembangunan Nasional, Sentralisasi AbstractRemote areas and classified as border areas are often areas that are vulnerable to social progress and less touched by national development. This is due to the difficulty of government access to reach areas classified as border areas so that the centralization of national development is only focused on urban areas (urban areas). Meanwhile, border areas or remote areas are then best and far from the attention of the government. Various policies carried out by the government often do not touch the fate of the people in the border areas. No wonder that often border areas are labeled with the label of underdeveloped areas. This lag is seen in various areas of life such as lack of education, low infrastructure, poor economy of the community. As a result, the poverty rate in border areas often increases. In fact, the natural resources of coastal areas are very rich. However, government policies for the welfare of all Indonesians often do not reach the welfare of people in remote areas. Including Aru. Thus, the discussion in this paper will focus on analyzing the phenomenon of poverty in coastal communities in Aru which is inversely proportional to the richness of Aru marine products to then see the extent of the role of local governments in tackling the problem of poverty in Aru.Keywords: National Development, Centralization