Utary Maharani Barus, Utary Maharani
Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sumatera Utara

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Analisis Yuridis Peraturan Penjagaan Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Terkait dengan Gangguan Keamanan dan Ketertiban di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Klas IIb Lubuk Pakam Sembiring, Loviga Ferdinanta; Barus, Utary Maharani; Isnaini, Isnaini
ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum Vol 1, No 2 (2019): ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum November
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (269.464 KB) | DOI: 10.31289/arbiter.v1i2.121

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out 1) whether the legal protection carried out by prison officers for prisoners is in accordance with Law Number 12 of 1999 concerning Corrections; 2) how is the security system at Class II B Penitentiary in Lubuk Pakam; and 3) What are the obstacles faced in law enforcement in Class II B Penitentiary, Lubuk Pakam. The research method used in this study is empirical normative juridical supported by secondary data and interviews with informants. The results of the study show that: 1) Correctional Institutions are a place to carry out the formation of prisoners and correctional students. 2) Community service and security and order maintenance in Lapas are not yet optimal, the quality of human security officers is low, and 3) Development officers and administrative officers must always be consolidated through coaching officers with concurrent and special meetings/briefings.
Kajian Yuridis Pemanggilan Notaris Sebagai Saksi Terkait Perkara Penipuan dan Penggelapan Di Direktorat Reserse Kriminal Umum Polda Sumut Tambunan, Poltak M.; Minin, Darwinsyah; Barus, Utary Maharani
ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum Vol 3, No 1 (2021): ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum Mei
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/arbiter.v3i1.869

Abstract

Notary public with an officiating trusted in practicing nowadays has got many attention paid  for there are many notary forced to come forward police officer, points related with presumably violated to the deed he/she produced. Provided calling-on Notary by police officer, it is noted in differently status either as official witness  or as suspected. Notary as public official is at once also stated professional, in hold the duty his position may play very important role in helping public there at once promote certainty rules. Official of notary public in reality, the appointment is under government also to dismiss out. In conducting the duties, notary is officiating the state charges, and on the deed he/she produced, namely known as  minute ( original document in deed ) is perhaps categorized a state document.  Public official is any officiating that government appoint  and also to terminate under governmental power. In hold the duties is given authority  and obligatory to serve public  in certainty matters, for in the line of working is conducting as well as governmental authority with authority. Although notary is a public official that government appoint it up and terminate,  but in hold the work, a notary is not governmental employee that got salary from government. The regulations No. 8 of 1974 regarding the principles of governmental employees is not applicable to the notary official.
Analisis Hukum Terhadap Peran Jurusita Pajak Dalam Pelaksanaan Penagihan Pajak Aktif Di Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Madya Medan Panjaitan, Monica Christina; Muazzul, Muazzul; Barus, Utary Maharani
ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum Vol 3, No 1 (2021): ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum Mei
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/arbiter.v3i1.870

Abstract

The results of research and discussion explain the role of tax authorities in the implementation of active tax collection in the Medan Tax Office Medan to taxpayers after the first passive billing. Then in the implementation of active billing there are several stages in the implementation of billing, the issuance of warning letters, the issuance of forced mail, warrants foreclosure, and announcement of the auction. The procedure of execution of active tax collection by the tax authorities in Medan Tax Office Medan has been in accordance with the rules and applicable law. However, in terms of disbursement of tax arrears is still not optimal due to the realization of the target set has not been achieved.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM NASABAH KPR BERSUBSIDI FLPP DENGAN AKAD MURABAHAH BIL WAKALAH ATAS RUMAH YANG BELUM SIAP HUNI: STUDI PADA PT BTN KANTOR CABANG PEMBANTU SYARIAH SETIA BUDI MEDAN Efendi Rangkuti, Khairunnisya; Sembiring, Idha Aprilyana; Barus, Utary Maharani
SIBATIK JOURNAL: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan Vol. 4 No. 9 (2025)
Publisher : Penerbit Lafadz Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/sibatik.v4i9.3335

Abstract

BTN Syariah KCP Setia Budi Medan is one of the Islamic financial institutions involved in implementing the government's Housing Financing Liquidity Facility (FLPP) program, offering the KPR BTN Sejahtera Syariah iB product based on a murabahah bil wakalah contract. In practice, the financing of housing units that are not yet deemed habitable, as they lack essential infrastructure, facilities, and public utilities (PSU) as required by prevailing laws and regulations. This study aims to analyze the conformity between applicable regulations and field practices, examine the legal consequences of such violations, and assess the legal protection available to affected customers. The results of the study indicate that the implementation of the murbahah bil wakalah contract at BTN Syariah KCPS Setia Budi Medan violates OJK Regulation Number 13/POJK.03/2021 concerning the Implementation of Bank Products and the DSN- MUI Fatwa Number 04/DSN- MUI/IV/2000 on Murabahah. The legal implications of implementing FLPP subsidized housing financing through murabahah bil wakalah contracts for uninhabitable housing constitute an unlawful act, as it contravenes Article 14 of Government Regulation No. 12 of 2021, Article 21 of BP Tapera Regulation No. 9 of 2021, and Articles 16 and 18 of OJK Regulation Number 6/POJK.07/2022. Moreover, the contract clauses in the murabahah bil wakalah agreement contain exoneration clauses that violate Article 18 of Law Number 8 of 1999. According to Article 20 of the murabahah bil wakalah agreement with BTN KCPS Setia Budi Medan, customers may pursue their rights through deliberation involving the bank, the customer, and the developer. If no agreement is reached, the matter may be resolved through litigation.
Penyelesaian Sengketa Antara Ahli Waris dan Badan Kemakmuran Masjid (BKM) terhadap Pengelolaan Objek Wakaf (Studi di Masjid Nurul Huda Desa Simpang Empat Kecamatan Karang Baru Kabupaten Aceh Tamiang) Aulia Hakim, Zean Via; Barus, Utary Maharani; Sembiring, Idha Aprilyana
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v5i6.5870

Abstract

Wakaf merupakan bentuk perbuatan ibadah yang mulia di mata Allah Swt karena karena memberikan harta benda secara cuma-cuma dalam kepentingan agama. Tulisan ini membahas bagaimana permasalahan penyebab terjadinya sengketa antara ahli waris dan BKM pada Masjid Nurul Huda terkait perubahan arah kiblat, kedua bagaimana kedudukan ahli waris dalam pengelolaan harta warisan yang telah diwakafkan menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 41 Tahun 2004 Tentang Wakaf, ketiga bagaimana penyelesaian sengketa antara ahli waris dan badan kemakmuran masjid akibat intervensi dalam pengelolaan objek wakaf pada Masjid Nurul Huda Desa Simpang Empat Kecamatan Karang Baru menurut  Undang-Undang Nomor 41 Tahun 2004 Tentang Wakaf. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif. Temuan dalam penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa penyebab sengekata yang terjadi antara ahli waris dan badan kemakmuran masjid diakibatkan oleh perbedaan pandangan dalam arah kiblat masjid. Kedua, pedudukan ahli waris dalam pengelolaan harta yang telah diwakafkan adalah tidak memiliki hak kepemilikan maupun hak pengelolaan atas objek wakaf.  Ketiga, penyelesaian sengketa yang terjadi antara ahli waris dan Badan Kemakmuran Masjid diselesaikan hingga tahap musyawarah dan mediasi. Kesimpulannya ahli waris tidak memiliki hak apapun ketika harta benda telah diwakafkan sehingga ahli waris tidak berhak ikut mengelola harta benda wakaf sehingga memunculkan sengketa dalam wakaf.