Umar Faruq Tohir
Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Zainal Hasan Genggong Probolinggo

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

DISKURSUS TENTANG HAK ASASI MINORITAS DZIMMI DI TENGAH MAYORITAS MUSLIM Umar Faruq Tohir
Akademika : Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Vol 16 No 2 (2011): Memperkuat Citra Islam sebagai Agama Perdamaian
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (339.181 KB)

Abstract

Pada era perkembangan Islam di masa lalu, negara persemakmuran Islam dipandang layak untuk dipertahankan. Keadaan tersebut menyebabkan terbaginya Negara persemakmuran Islam ke dalam dua kategori yaitu dar al-Islan dan dar a;-Harb.Pembagian ini telah melahirkan sebuah konsep sekolah Islam yang eksklusif yang mengangap orang kafir yang hidup di wilayah non-Islam dapat diperangi. Mereka mengira bahwa setiap orang kafir berniat untuk merendahkan dan memerangi mereka, meskipun anggapan tersebut tidak selalu benar. Sekolah Islam yang eksklusif ini juga menganggap bahwa tampuk pemerintahan harus dipegang oleh Muslim dan tidak ada kesempatan bagi orang kafir untuk menjadi pemimpin di segala aspek pemerintahan Islam.Para orang kafir masih dan akan selalu menjadi masyarakat kelas dua.Bagaimanapun, pemikiran tradisional semacam ini masih hidup dan menjadi paradigma berpikir para sarjana fiqih dewasa ini.Jika kita menilik pada Piagam Madinah, kita dapat mengetahui bahwa Nabi Muhammad tidak pernah merendahkan orang kafir.Beliau membuat unadang- undang yang harus dipatuhi setiap masyarakat Madinah, Muslim ataupun orang kafir.Di era kontemporer ini, dimana sebuah Negara bersifat teritorial, subordinasi golongan kafir harus dihapuskan.Negara teritorial pada masa ini dibagi tanpa membedakan antara Muslim dan golongan kafir karena mereka memiliki posisi dan hak yang sama untuk mengembangkan daerahnya dan hidup berdampingan satu sama lain.Kata Kunci: Dar al-Islam dan dar al-Harb, Negara berbangsa tunggal, pemikiran kontemporer, sama. The territorial of Islamic dominion was become worth to be struggled in the past era of Islamic development. This circumstance divided the territorial of Islamic dominion in to dâr al-Islâm and dâr al- Harb. This divide has conceptualized a new Islamic exclusive school who has assumed that the infidels who have been in the non Islamic territorial could be battled. They think that every infidels look Moslems away and wish to battle them, even contrary, in the actually. This Islamic exclusive school also think that the governance must be lead by Moslem and there is no chance for infidel to be a leader in all aspects of Islamic territorial government. The infidels always and still in the second class. Whatever, this classical thinking still alive in the mind (paradigm) of the present fiqh's scholars. If we remind to the Charter of Madinah, we can find that our prophet Muhammad never sub-ordinated the infidel. He made a charter where every Madinah's society had to obey the rules, there is no different between Moslem or infidel. In this contemporary time, where the system of territorial become a state, the sub-ordination to the infidel should be pushed away. The territorial today is stated by escaping the difference status between Moslem and infidel, because they have the same position and right to develop the state and live besides each other.
PESAN DAMAI AL-GHAZALI; SEBUAH KONSEP KAFIR DAN MUKMIN DALAM PERSPEKTIF TASAWUF AKHLAQI Umar Faruq Tohir
Akademika : Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Vol 18 No 2 (2013): Islam dan Kerukunan Umat
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (390.668 KB)

Abstract

Pengkafiran terhadap orang lain yang berbeda pemahaman kerap kali terjadi akhir-akhir ini. Seseorang biasanya tetap menuduh kâfir seorang mu'min meski dia masih melaksanakan sholat, puasa dan zakat. Mengkafirkan orang seharusnya sesuai dengan syarî'ah. Syarî'ah hanya membolehkan pengkafiran terhadap orang yang telah benar- benar keluar dari Islam, tidak mengakui Allah sebagai Tuhan, menolak Muhammad sebagai utusan-Nya, dan tentunya, menolak ajaran-ajarannya. Tulisan ini membahas tentang konsep kafir dan mukmin dalam perspektif tasawuf al-Ghazali. Paparan dalam tulisan ini merupakan hasil penelitian pustaka yang bersifat deskriptif. Dari hasil penelitian disimpulkan mengenai pemikiran al-Ghazali mengenai konsep kafir dan mukmin. Menurut al-Ghazali, orang yang menuduh kâfir seseorang tanpa bukti bahwa seseorang tersebut telah menolak ajaran Nabi Muhammad, sejatinya, adalah kâfir. Model pengkafiran ini juga terjadi pada masa al-Ghazali, di mana banyak ulama mengkafirkan lawan ideologinya hanya karena perbedaan pendapat. Dalam komunitas majemuk, melalui konsep tashawwuf akhlâkî, al-Ghazali menyarankan mu'min untuk menghargai semua orang kâfir, namun demikian, al-Ghzali juga melarang mu'min untuk menjadi kâfir, karena menurutnya, kufr dapat menghambat proses tazkiyah al-nafs. Berangkat dari perbincangan-perbincangan ini, al-Ghazali telah merumuskan lima kriteria kualitas seseorang, mu'min atau kâfir, yaitu al-wujûd al-dzâtî, al-wujûd al-hissî, al-wujûd al-khayâlî, al- wujûd al-'aqlî, dan al-wujûd al-syibhî. Accusing someone with a different understanding as a kâfir happens frequently nowdays. The people use to accuse mu'min as a kâfir event he still does praying, fasting, and zkat (charity). Stereotyping people as a kâfir should be in line with the syarî'ah. Syarî'ah merely allows stereotyping people as a kâfir who really out of Islam, rejects Allah as his God, refuses Muhammad as His prophet, and of course, ignores his (Muhammad) taught. Accusing someone as a kâfir which merely based on contradictory view is not permitted by the syarî'ah. So, people who accuses someone infidel without proving of his ignoring to Muhammad's taught, in fact, is a kâfir, according to al-Ghazali's view. This kind of accusing people as a kâfir, also happened in the al- Ghazali's era, where so many Ulama accuse their ideological opponents as a kâfir just because of their difference in a certain understanding. Imam Hanbali ever accused Imam Asy'ari as a kâfir because Imam Asy'ari ignored Muhammad's taught in term of Allah's residence in arsy. Also, Imam Asy'ari ever accused Imam Hanbali as a kâfir because of his ignoring Muhammad's taught in term of no Allah's allies. In the plural community, al-Ghazali trough his tashawwuf akhlâkî concept, suggested mu'min to honor all kâfir, even al-Ghzali also prohibited mu'min to be kâfir, because in his opinion, kufr has blocked tazkiyah al-nafs process. Based on those discourses, al- Ghazali has formulated five criteria of people quality, whether mu'min or kâfir. Those five criteria are al-wujûd al-dzâtî, al-wujûd al-hissî, al-wujûd al-khayâlî, al-wujûd al-'aqlî, dan al-wujûd al- syibhî. So, a believer (mu'min) should not accuse people as a kâfir easily. People should respect another people who have different understanding and faith, over tolerance. Accusing people as a kâfir is permitted merely for real kâfir who really ignores Muhammad's taught.