Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan
Agus Budi Susilo
Hakim Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Bandung
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PENEGAKAN HUKUM YANG BERKEADILAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF FILSAFAT HERMENEUTIKA HUKUM (Suatu Solusi Terhadap Problematika Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia) Agus Budi Susilo
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 2, No 3 (2013)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.2.3.2013.449-470

Abstract

The essence of the rule of law is justice. Justice has many meanings, depending on the perspective. Every country often arise various problems, related to the administration of justice in the realm of law. The concept of justice that have been established in a country is not necessarily better when applied to other countries. However, it is possible to mutual influenced or be integrated between each other thinking about the meaning of justice, particularly those having a universal nature. At the philosophical level, each country has own thoughts of the roots, depending on the basic norms and socio-cultural life of the nation. Thus, about the meaning of justice from the view of philosophy, the proper tools are used is hermeneutic. Search justice in the perspective of hermeneutics in the context of law enforcement should also be framed by the perspective of jurisprudence, in order to obtain the intersection and its implementation easier. Keywords: Justice, Hermeneutics, Legal Studies and Law Enforcement.
REFORMULASI PERBUATAN MELANGGAR HUKUM OLEH BADAN ATAU PEJABAT PEMERINTAHAN DALAM KONTEKS KOMPETENSI ABSOLUT PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA Agus Budi Susilo
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 2, No 2 (2013)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.2.2.2013.291-308

Abstract

Agency or government officials have broad authority in implementing government affairs. Broad authority was likely to be abused , causing loss and injustice in the society as well as lower level government officials, therefore there must be other institutions that control it. Based on the theory of triad politics, the executive is politically controlled by the legislature and are legally controlled by the judiciary, because the agency or government officials running the executive function, which controls the judiciary juridical is the State Administrative Court ( Judicial TUN ). TUN judicial control by the Court at this time is so vague, because it is limited by the law on the Judiciary TUN revised twice (Law No. . 5 of 1986 which was later revised by Law No. . 9 of 2004 and Act No. . 51 of 2009 ) . Testing is limited to understanding the Administrative Court Administrative Decision ( KTUN ) in the strict sense. It can be said that the law on the Judiciary TUN philosophically opposed to the purpose of the establishment TUN Judicial institutions, namely resolve administrative disputes in a broad sense. Therefore, based on futuristic ideas that need to be explored further in the TUN Courts abolut authority to exercise control or testing for unlawful acts committed government agencies or officials. All this is nothing else aims to reposition back nature of administrative law enforcement by the state Judicial TUN and simplify all the administrative state dispute settlement based on the principles of effectiveness and efficiency. Keyword; Deeds Against the Law, Government Officials, Administrative Court
Co-Authors