Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan
Eman Suparman
Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
KERJASAMA BIDANG PERADILAN ANTAR NEGARA DALAM RANGKA UPAYA PENYERAGAMAN PRANATA HUKUM ANTAR BANGSA Eman Suparman
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 1, No 2 (2012)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.1.2.2012.171-188

Abstract

Applicability of the rules of the positive law of a country is limited by territorial boundaries that country. While the legal relationship that lasted between members of the community of nations always occurs and exceeds the limits of the territorial sovereignty of the state law. Therefore, the national law of the countries should continue to be pursued in order to be able to answer a variety of transnational issues that exist. The effort is certainly not intended to be uniform throughout the internal legal system of sovereign states, but merely an attempt to harmonize the rules of international private law. While problem solving for issues specific civil law will be made by the judicial bodies of each country. In order to accommodate this reality, is a conditio sine qua non for Indonesia to consider measures to make international agreements in order to enrich the rules of civil procedure law court. The problem, at least to face the coming force of AFTA in the ASEAN region should be harmonization between the legal systems of the individual ASEAN member countries. If not, the difficulty for the difficulties to be faced every country, when the demands of the right form of execution verdict handed down in a country can not be implemented in other sovereign nations. The situation is certainly less beneficial terms of economic cooperation. Therefore, the establishment of a model law for a convention in the form of the ever pursued by countries in the European region, reasonably considered to be a model in drafting the ASEAN convention. At least these efforts will support the objective of allied countries to achieve harmonization of laws between countries in the ASEAN region. Keywords: cooperation in judicial, legal institutions, harmonization
PENDISTRIBUSIAN KEADILAN OLEH PENGADILAN SERTA BUDAYA HUKUM DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA Eman Suparman
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 1, No 3 (2012)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.1.3.2012.399-416

Abstract

Handle civil disputes in general, for many the sense how the courts considered too laden with procedures, formalistic, rigid, and slow to make a decision on a dispute. Presumably these factors can not be separated from the judge's perspective on a very rigid laws and normative-procedural law in doing concretization. While a judge should be able to be living interpretator captures the spirit of fairness in society and not bound by the normative-procedural rigor present in a legislation, because the judge is no longer a la bouche de la loi (law funnel). There are indications that the judge did not have enough courage to make decisions that are different from the normative provisions of the law, so that substantial justice is always difficult to achieve through a court verdict, because the judges and the courts will only give formal justice. Assessment of fairness in general terms only from one side only, ie those who receive treatment. The seekers of justice in general, defeated parties in the case, will always provide an assessment that the unjust verdict. It can not be denied is one result of the function and role of the trial run has been oriented towards the success of efforts to support and programs set by the government or the executive. Keywords: normative procedural, formal justice, substantial justice
Co-Authors