Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Indonesian Sharia Economics Journal of Islamic Studies and Civilization Journal of Islamic Studies and Civilization
umi latifah
Institut Pesantren Mathali'ul Falah
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Kebijakan Mandatori Sertifikasi Halal bagi Produk Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah di Kabupaten Kudus umi latifah
JIOSE: Journal of Indonesian Sharia Economics Vol 1 No 1 (2022): Maret 2022
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Ekonomi Islam Institut Pesantren Mathali'ul Falah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (294.028 KB) | DOI: 10.35878/jiose.v1i1.362

Abstract

Enactment of Law No.33 Th. 2014 or the Law on Halal Product Guarantee (Act JPH) and PP No.31 Th. 2019 as a guide for implementing the JPH Law has the consequence of having halal certification obligations on all products in circulation. Revealed again in PMK RI No. 57/PMK.05/2021. This process requires stakeholder readiness and education for industry players throughout Indonesia, including Kudus Regency. The existence of this policy raises the problem of how to implement it in the field. This study aims to determine its implementation, responses from MSMEs, challenges and opportunities for MSMEs.This research is field research with data collection methods through interviews, observations, and document studies. The data processing through the making of transcripts, codes, and categorization. Then analyzed using qualitative analysis. The result of the research shows that the implementation of Act JPH in the Kudus Regency has not been optimal. It is shown from the implementation activities, communication between stakeholders, and implementing tendencies in implementing policies. This research also finds there are various challenges to be faced and opportunities that can be utilized for MSMEs with the existence of a mandatory halal certification policy.
Towards an Integrative-Critical Islamic Epistemology: A Comparative Analysis of al-Faruqi and Sardar Khabib Solihin; Umi Latifah
Journal of Islamic Studies and Civilization Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Islamic Studies and Civilization
Publisher : ADP Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61680/jisc.v3i2.58

Abstract

This study is motivated by the epistemological crisis in Islamic scholarship, driven by the dominance of secular Western paradigms and the dichotomy between religious and secular sciences. It aims to analyze and compare the epistemological frameworks proposed by Ismail Raji al-Faruqi and Ziauddin Sardar in addressing these issues. This research employs a qualitative method with a comparative approach through a literature review of scholarly works examining the thoughts of both figures. The findings indicate that al-Faruqi proposes the Islamization of knowledge as an integrative approach, reconstructing modern sciences within a tawhidic framework. In contrast, Sardar advances the concept of the “Islamization of knowledge” in a more transformative sense, emphasizing the construction of knowledge grounded fundamentally in the Islamic worldview. Discursively, al-Faruqi demonstrates strength in operational and practical dimensions, whereas Sardar offers greater depth in philosophical inquiry and epistemological critique. This study concludes that an integrative-critical synthesis of these two perspectives is essential for developing an authentic, contextual, and relevant Islamic epistemology capable of addressing contemporary intellectual challenges.
Towards an Integrative-Critical Islamic Epistemology: A Comparative Analysis of al-Faruqi and Sardar Khabib Solihin; Umi Latifah
Journal of Islamic Studies and Civilization Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Islamic Studies and Civilization
Publisher : ADP Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61680/jisc.v3i2.58

Abstract

This study is motivated by the epistemological crisis in Islamic scholarship, driven by the dominance of secular Western paradigms and the dichotomy between religious and secular sciences. It aims to analyze and compare the epistemological frameworks proposed by Ismail Raji al-Faruqi and Ziauddin Sardar in addressing these issues. This research employs a qualitative method with a comparative approach through a literature review of scholarly works examining the thoughts of both figures. The findings indicate that al-Faruqi proposes the Islamization of knowledge as an integrative approach, reconstructing modern sciences within a tawhidic framework. In contrast, Sardar advances the concept of the “Islamization of knowledge” in a more transformative sense, emphasizing the construction of knowledge grounded fundamentally in the Islamic worldview. Discursively, al-Faruqi demonstrates strength in operational and practical dimensions, whereas Sardar offers greater depth in philosophical inquiry and epistemological critique. This study concludes that an integrative-critical synthesis of these two perspectives is essential for developing an authentic, contextual, and relevant Islamic epistemology capable of addressing contemporary intellectual challenges.
Co-Authors Khabib Solihin