Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Akuakultur Sungai dan Danau
Sudirman Sudirman
Alumni Prodi Budidaya Perairan Fakultas Pertanian Unbari
Other

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Respons Stres Benih Ikan Jelawat (Leptobarbus hoevenii Blkr) Yang di Beri Ekstrak Daun Ubi Jalar Pada Proses Transportasi Sudirman Sudirman; Muhammad Sugihartono; M Yusuf Arifin
Jurnal Akuakultur Sungai dan Danau Vol 7, No 2 (2022): Oktober
Publisher : Universitas Batangahari Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33087/akuakultur.v7i2.135

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of sweet potato leaf extract as an anti-stress in the process of transporting jelawat fish (L. hoevenii Blkr) fry. The experimental design used was a completely randomized design (CRD) with 4 doses of sweet potato leaf extract treatment, namely; Treatment A : Sweet Potato Leaf Extract With 2 mL/L Water Dosage, Treatment B: Sweet Potato Leaf Extract With 4 mL/L Water, Treatment C : Sweet Potato Leaf Extract With 6 mL/L Water, and Treatment D : Without Provision of Sweet Potato Leaf Extract (Control). Each treatment was replicated 3 times. The test parameters observed were blood glucose, glycogen levels, and survival rates (TKH). The results showed that the administration of sweet potato leaf extract with different doses gave significantly different effects on blood glucose levels of jelawat fish fry. The highest blood glucose levels were in treatment D (76.00 mg/dL), followed by treatment A (34.33 mg/dL), then treatment C (33.33 mg/dL), and treatment B (32.50 mg/dL). ). For glycogen levels at the beginning (0th hour) of 130 mg/100mL, and increased at 8th hour (end) to 175 mg/100mL for treatment A, 155.21 mg/100mL for Treatment B, 188.34 mg/ 100mL for Treatment C, and 197.41 mg/100mL for Treatment D. The best survival rate in this study was in treatment B (90.33%), then treatment A (85.67%), treatment C (83.00 %) and treatment D (80.00%).
Co-Authors M Yusuf Arifin Muhammad Sugihartono