Arifin Ma’ruf
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Tindakan Menguasai Pasar Luar Negeri Secara Illegal (Analisis Pengenaan Bea Masuk Anti Dumping Terhadap Impor Produk Hot Rolled Plate (HRP) Dari Negara Republik Rakyat Tiongkok (RRT), Ukraina, dan Singapura) Arifin Ma’ruf
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Vol 6, No 2 (2017): Supremasi Hukum
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/sh.v6i2.2021

Abstract

The results of the study show that, in Article 6 paragraph (2) PP. 34 of 2011on Antidumping Measures, Measures of Action, and Safeguard Measures Tradestipulates that investigation requests can not be made when the dumping margin is lessthan 2%. Based on PMK Regulation No. 150 / PMK.011 / 2012 dated October1, 2012 the amount of anti-dumping duties for PRC 10.47%, Singapore 12.33%and Ukraine 12.50%. Referring to the above regulation of imposition of anti-dumpingduties for Singapore and Ukhrainian PRC is appropriate, because the findings ofmargin dumping already exceed 2%.
Pelanggaran Persaingan Usaha dan Problematika Eksekusi Atas Putusan KPPU Arifin Ma’ruf
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Vol 5, No 2 (2016): Supremasi Hukum
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/sh.v5i2.2008

Abstract

The genesis of Law No. 5 of 1999 on Prohibition Monopili and UnfairBusiness Competition is expected to be a solution to the problem of unfair businesscompetition that had been rife in Indonesia, the Commission dirikanya spirit in orderto "mensehatkan" business competition in Indonesia. Healthy competition would have apositive impact on entrepreneurs who compete against each other or compete as it maylead to efforts to increase efficiency, productivity, and quality of product produced. Theresults of this study show that the breach of competition rife in Indonesia is bid rigging,In addition there are the problems in the execution of the KPPU decision. This paperwill discuss the tender conspiracy that inhibit competition and problematic execution ofthe Commission's decision.