Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum
Ach. Tahir
State Islamic University Sunan Kalijaga
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelanggaran Berat Hak Asasi Manusia Ach. Tahir
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Vol 2, No 2 (2013): Supremasi Hukum
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/sh.v2i2.1931

Abstract

Gross violation of human rights has always been stalking the world. Wars in Iraq and Palestine not only devastate buildings and infrastructure, but also above all that take the toll of thousands of civilians whose lives are supposed to be protected. United States, all this time claiming as the greatest democracy and champion of human rights, apparently is the one that inflict worst injury to democracy and human rights themselves, as apparent in the fact that until today the issues of wars in Iraq and Palestine are yet to be settled. The United Nations, in its ideal vision the spearhead of justice in global level, is in actuality cowering before the United States and its allies. Sad but true, Law becomes powerless in the face of ambitions of global political power.
Problematika Hakim dalam Menghadapi Antinomi Ach. Tahir
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Vol 1, No 1 (2012): Supremasi Hukum
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/sh.v1i1.1900

Abstract

In deciding some cases, judges might get various antinomies. Antinomy is a contradiction between legal interests based on justice of each disputed party. The made decision must proportionally contain three principles: certainty, usefulness, and justice. If they obtain the contradiction between the principle of justice and legal certainty, they should prioritize the former. If they get the contradiction between an old statute and a new statute not abrogating the old one, they must enact the new one (lex posteriori derogat legi priori). If they find the contradiction between a superior statute and an inferior statute, they must use the superior one (lex superior derogat legi inferiori). If they get the contradiction between a statute and an court decision (Jurisprudence), they must use the latter (res judicata pro veritate habetur). If they get the contradiction between a statute and a custom law, they must prioritize the latter.
Co-Authors