Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Dan Pelaku Usaha Dalam Transaksi Jual Beli Barang Secara Online Irlan Anugrah; Ichwan Setiawan
Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Vol 6 No 2 (2022): Desember 2022
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PGRI YOGYAKARTA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (346.566 KB) | DOI: 10.31316/jk.v6i2.3066

Abstract

AbstrakPerlindungan hukum terhadap para pihak yang melakukan transaksi jual beli barang melalui online sudah menjadi kebiasaan masyarakat Indonesia. Kemudahan dan efisiensi menjadi alasan utama banyak masyarakat yang menginginkan mekanisme jual beli secara online. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui bagaimana perlindungan hukum yang diberikan oleh negara melalui peraturan perundang-undangan terhadap masyarakat sebagai konsumen yang berhubungan dengan transaksi elektronik (e-commerce) dengan pelaku usaha selaku penjual. Beberapa hukum positif terkait peraturan perdagangan di Indonesia, khususnya e-commerce antara lain UU Perlindungan Konsumen dan UU ITE memberikan gambaran tentang apa saja hal-hal penting yang menjadi hak-hak dan kewajiban para pihak yang bertransaksi. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif, pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan (statute approcah), maka didapat hasil penelitian bahwa: l) Legalitas transaksi jual beli secara online diatur dalam Pasal 47 dan 48 PP Nomor 2008 tentang Penyelenggaraan Sistem dan Transaksi Elektronik; 2) Hak-Hak dan Kewajiban Konsumen dan Pelaku Usaha diatur dalam Pasal 4 s.d. 7 UU Perlindungan Konsumen; 3) Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Konsumen dan Pelaku Usaha dalam transaksi jual beli barang secara online diatur secara jelas dan runut dalam beberapa pasal pada UU Perlindungan Konsumen dan UU ITE, Pasal 4 UU Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa, serta Pasal 84 PP Nomor 82 Tahun 2012 tentang tentang Penyelenggaraan Sistem dan Transaksi Elektronik.Kata Kunci: Perlindungan Hukum, Konsumen, Transaksi AbstractLegal protection for parties who make online buying and selling transactions has become a habit of the Indonesian people. Ease and efficiency are the main reasons many people want an online buying and selling mechanism. The purpose of this study is to find out how the legal protection provided by the state through laws and regulations to the public as consumers related to electronic transactions (e-commerce) with business actors as sellers. Several positive laws related to trade regulations in Indonesia, especially e-commerce, including the Consumer Protection Law and the ITE Law, provide an overview of what are the important things that are the rights and obligations of the transacting parties. By using normative legal research methods, the approach to laws and regulations (statute approcah), the results of the study were obtained that: l) The legality of online buying and selling transactions is regulated in Articles 47 and 48 of PP Number 2008 concerning the Implementation of Electronic Systems and Transactions; 2) The Rights and Obligations of Consumers and Business Actors are regulated in Articles 4 to 7 of the Consumer Protection Law; 3) Legal Protection of Consumers and Business Actors in online buying and selling transactions is clearly and in order in several articles in the Consumer Protection Law and the ITE Law, Article 4 of the Arbitration Law and Alternative Dispute Resolution, and Article 84 PP Number 82 of 2012 concerning the Implementation of Electronic Systems and Transactions.Keywords: Legal Protection, Consumers, Transactions
PERBANDINGAN PENUNTUTAN PADA SISTEM PERADILAN HUKUM PIDANA DI INDONESIA DAN AMERIKA SERIKAT Muhamad Abdul Rasyid; Ichwan Setiawan
Jurnal Ilmiah Publika Vol 10, No 2 (2022): JURNAL ILMIAH PUBLIKA
Publisher : Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33603/publika.v10i2.7839

Abstract

Didasarkan pada sudut pandang sistem peradilan pidana dalam pilihan dan pada hukum acara pidana (formeel strafrecht / strafprocesrecht) secara khusus, pembuktian itu berfungsi menentukan dalam menegaskan kesalahan seseorang sehingga hukuman dijatuhkan oleh hakim. penulis ingin tahu tentang perbandingan sistem peradilan pidana di Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat. AS menganut perangkat kedaulatan ganda, dengan mempertimbangkan klaim dengan bantuan setiap kedaulatan yang dianutnya, terutama kedaulatan federal dan negara bagian. setiap penguasa dapat menuntut tersangka dalam suatu peristiwa yang sesuai dengan yurisdiksi setiap hukum yang berdaulat tanpa melanggar prinsip Nebis in Idem. Indonesia tidak menganut kedaulatan ganda. Jika amerika memiliki jaksa penuntut umum yaitu kejaksaan federal dan kejaksaan negara yang mewakili kedaulatannya, di Indonesia hanya ada kejaksaan tunggal sebagai perwakilan negara dalam sistem peradilan pidana.
KAJIAN HUKUM KESEPAKATAN PARA PIHAK DALAM MENCAPAI PENETAPAN PUTUSAN VERSTEK PERKARA PERCERAIAN (Riset Studi Kantor Hukum Arif Sasongko SH & Partners) Irwan Irwan; Ichwan Setiawan
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 7, No 1 (2023): Maret
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v7i1.5146

Abstract

In divorce cases in court, the defendants and plaintiffs cannot always attend court proceedings in accordance with legal determinations. Absence on the appointed day can cause the divorce to be decided by way of verstek by the judge. This research intends to identify and explain how agreements outside the court are formed before a petition or application is submitted from one of the parties (the plaintiff or the plaintiff) to obtain a collective agreement to reach a verstek decision in divorce matters. The research method used is empirical law research with a qualitative research type. The result of the discussion is that a mutual agreement before the divorce trial is needed to facilitate the implementation of the divorce trial. With the existence of a mutual agreement, the divorce trial can be carried out in the absence of the applicant and the respondent which is finally decided by way of verstek by the court judge. It is hoped that all parties related to the enforcement of divorce issues should fight for peace before the implementation of the divorce trial so that they can reduce divorce cases which are increasing day by day.
Kajian Yuridis Terkait Hak-Hak Tersangka Menurut Hukum Positif Ridwan Ridwan; Ichwan Setiawan
Syntax Literate Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : Syntax Corporation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36418/syntax-literate.v8i10.13826

Abstract

The institution appointed to tackle crimes or violations that occur in the community is the police agency. As stated in the criminal procedure code (KUHAP), the police agency is given the authority to conduct investigations. The investigation process is carried out on the suspects who are suspected of having committed a criminal act that occurred. In an effort to prove that a person is suspected of having committed a criminal act, law enforcement officials must pay attention to the rights of suspects as stipulated in applicable law. Based on the above, the problem that will be discussed in this writing is about what rights are obtained by suspects according to the Criminal Procedure Code and Human Rights as a manifestation of protecting dignity and dignity as human beings. As for the research method used is a normative research method which of course focuses on literature research to obtain secondary data from legal materials. The normative approach is carried out by reviewing the provisions or applicable laws and regulations. The results of the study that the rights of suspects in the Criminal Justice System in Indonesia have officially received legal recognition as stipulated in Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights and Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Law known as the Code of Criminal Procedure (KUHAP) as respect as a complete human being, who has dignity and dignity.
Kajian Peran Kepolisian terhadap Tindak Pidana Pelanggaran Merek dengan Memperdagangkan Barang tanpa Seizin Pemilik Merek yang Terdaftar Abel Yumay; Ichwan Setiawan; I Gusti Agung Ngurah
HUMANIORUM Vol 1 No 03 (2023): Jurnal Humaniorum
Publisher : PT Elaborium Elevasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37010/hmr.v1i03.20

Abstract

Unlike copyrights, trademarks must first be registered in the General Trademark Register. This is useful so that every producer, entrepreneur, or trader can be legally protected with respect to trademark rights over their goods. Trademark Law Number 15 of 2001, which requires the mark to be registered. If the trademark has been registered legally, in the event of a violation of the rights to the mark, the legal owner or rights holder can file a claim by taking legal action as stated in Article 76 of the Law on Marks and Trademarks 20 (2016) concerning geographical indications. Indeed, the protection of brand rights for brand owners in Indonesia has recently decreased. In fact, trademark infringement is still common. Well-known trademarks are generally inseparable from intellectual property rights violations, such as counterfeiting, imitation, and reputational carpooling. This journal uses normative legal research methods. Legal writing is research that examines legal materials, positive legal provisions, legal principles, and legal doctrine in order to answer the legal issues at hand. The problem approach used is the statutory approach. The technique of tracing legal materials uses a literature study technique as well as an analysis of the study using qualitative analysis.Based on the research results, the authors can conclude that their rights still have protection against criminal acts of trademark infringement. Likewise, the police also play a fundamental role in dealing with criminal acts of trademark infringement by trading goods without the permission of the registered trademark owner. There are three types of police handling of trademark infringement: pre-emptive, preventive, and repressive measures.