Metty Soletri
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

- AKTA JUAL BELI YANG DIBUAT OLEH PPATS BERKAITAN DENGAN PROSES PENDAFTARAN TANAH (STUDI KASUS PPATS KECAMATAN BATUJAYA KABUPATEN KARAWANG): - Astrid Utari Kemala; Metty Soletri
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 5 No 3 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v5i3.16486

Abstract

According to the mandate of the UUPA, which is mentioned in Article 19 paragraph (1) of Law No. 5/1960 Jo. and Article 3 letter an of PP 24/1997, the goal of land registration is to ensure legal certainty. In this instance, the role of PPAT is one of the institutions that promotes the attainment of the objective of land registration. But in practice, many continue to employ PPATS services in place of PPAT. Problem statement: Does the PPATS play the same role with PPAT ? How about the legal status of sales purchase deed made by PPATS to land certified. A normative-juridical research methodology was used, with the nature of qualitative research, literature study and the primary data is interviewed. Data analysis is done by qualitative methods with use interview data result. The conclusion is carried out by the deductive method. The research results, discussion and conclusion that act of transfer land rights need land registration to obtain legal certainty. Legal consequences if land obtained through buying and selling but not immediately registered is not meeting the clear legality. The transfer of land rights carried out by PPATS is not continued until the process of tittle transfer document.
EKSEKUSI HAK TANGGUNGAN TERDAHAP HAK ATAS TANAH SEBAGAI AKIBAT WANPRESTASI PERJANJIAN KREDIT MODAL KERJA (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 3569/K/Pdt/2016): Execution Of Mortgage Rights Regarding Land Rights As Defect Of Working Capital Credit Agreements (Study Decision Number 3569/K/Pdt/2016) Okmeydianti Annur Purwanto; Metty Soletri
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 1 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v6i1.19305

Abstract

Fulfillment of the rights and obligations of the parties in contractual law is guaranteed by law.  In this case, to see what is the right of each party, this is because the debtor is an obligation for the creditor and vice versa.  The formulation of the problem that will be discussed in this article is the procedure for executing mortgage rights carried out in Decision Number 3569/K/Pdt/2016 and its conformity with statutory regulations.  The research method used is normative legal research which is descriptive analytical in nature and the data used is primary and secondary data.  The results of the research and discussion refer to the suitability of the execution of mortgage rights carried out in Decision Number 3569/K/Pdt/2016 with Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights.  The conclusion in this article is that the execution of mortgage rights can be carried out through parate execution, executorial title, and private sale and the execution of mortgage rights carried out in Decision Number 3569/K/Pdt/2016 is in accordance with Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights.