Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.92
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Prioris Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Amicus Curiae
Dian Adriawan Daeng Tawang
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : amicus curiae

 1 
SANKSI PIDANA TERHADAP KECELAKAAN LALU LINTAS YANG MENGAKIBATKAN HILANGNYA NYAWA ZAINAL ARIFIN (PUTUSAN NOMOR : 1346/PID.SUS/2023/PN.SBY): Criminal Sanctions for Traffic Accidents Resulting in the Loss of Zainal Arifin Life (Decision Number: 1346/Pid.Sus/2023/Pn.Sby) Erlina Patricia; Dian Adriawan Daeng Tawang
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v2i4.24692

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze Decision Number: 1346/Pid.Sus/2023/Pn.Sby on Criminal Sanctions for Traffic Accidents Resulting in the Loss of  Zainal Arifin Life. The identification problems discussed are 1) Is the provision of criminal sanctions against the defendant Caesar Rianaditya Fasa Ardiansyah Bin Djoko Purnomo which resulted in loss of life by Law Number. 22 of 2009 concerning Traffic and Transportation Roads?; and 2) Is the criminal sanction imposed by the Panel of Judges in Decision Number: 1346/Pid.Sus/2023/Pn.Sby by imposing a prison sentence of 5 (five) months by the objectives of punishment?. This research uses a type of normative legal research which is descriptive analysis, using secondary data, then processed qualitatively. This study  result and oncludes that the 1) criminal sanction imposed on the defendant is very light and not optimal because it is not by the criminal sanctions in Article 310 paragraph (4) of Law Number 22 of 2009 concerning Traffic and Transportation Roads, and has not reflected a sense of justice; 2) the imposition of criminal sanctions is not by the objectives of punishment in absolute theory, relative theory, combined theory and contemporary theory.
SANKSI PIDANA TERKAIT DENGAN PUTUSAN NO.890/PID.SUS/2022/PN.JKT.BRT.: Juridical Review of Criminal Sanctions related to Decisions Number 890/Pid.Sus/2022/Pn. Jkt. Brt. Silawati Dayang Ganjar; Dian Adriawan Daeng Tawang
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v2i4.24739

Abstract

Cyber law is regulated in the ITE Law. Still, the criminal sanctions it regulates are often imposed much lighter than the maximum penalty threatened, such as the Borobudur Temple Stupa meme case in Decision No. 890/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Jkt.Brt. Identification of the problems that will be researched, namely: what caused the judge to impose a lighter criminal sanction than the ITE Law regulation in Decision Number 890/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Jkt.Brt.? And, is the criminal sanction in Decision Number 890/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Jkt.Brt. in accordance with the purpose of punishment? The research method used is normative research, descriptive in nature, using secondary data through literature study, and qualitative data analysis. The research result and conclusion of the research shows that the judge imposed a lighter criminal sanction because the defendant did not have the intention to commit an act that caused hatred or hostility as regulated in Article 28 paragraph (2) jo. Article 45 of the ITE Law. This lighter criminal sanction is not in accordance with the 3R+1H punishment objectives, namely: Reformation, Restraint, Retribution, and Deterrence. The panel of judges should impose a heavier punishment based on the principles of justice, legal certainty, and expediency to achieve the objectives of punishment.
PIDANA BERSYARAT TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA KEKARANTINAAN KESEHATAN (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 21/PID.S/2021/PN TNG): Conditional Punishment for Perpetrators of the Health Quarantine Crimes (A Study of Decision Number 21/Pid.S/2021/Pn Tng) Muhammad Jafar Shodiq; Dian Adriawan Daeng Tawang
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v2i4.24963

Abstract

In 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic, Indonesian influencer Rachel Vennya evaded mandatory quarantine after returning from New York by bribing the COVID-19 Task Force. Her case was reviewed under Verdict No. 21/Pid.S/2021/PN.Tng. This study analyzes the imposition of conditional criminal sanctions and the characteristics of the penalties applied. Using a normative-descriptive method with qualitative analysis and deductive reasoning, the research draws from primary and secondary legal sources. Criminal sanctions aim not only to punish violations but also to promote social and psychological compliance, while quarantine rules seek to prevent disease transmission. The findings show that Rachel Vennya and her accomplices received conditional sentences that do not align with substantive justice, as the lenient sanctions fail to reflect the seriousness of the offense. Ideally, the perpetrators should have received stricter penalties or served the four-month imprisonment determined by the court. Thus, law-enforcement authorities, especially judges, must impose proportionate sanctions to strengthen deterrence and uphold legal order.
Co-Authors Erlina Patricia Junandri Caesar Putra Muhammad Jafar Shodiq Rini Purwaningsih Silawati Dayang Ganjar Siti Nurbaiti