Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Implementation of the Principle of Restorative Justice as an Alternative Resolving to Types of Crimes in the Related Criminal System Corruption Crimes in Indonesia Wawan Fransisco
LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 11 No. 4 (2022): October: Law Science and Field
Publisher : IHSA Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (573.348 KB) | DOI: 10.35335/legal.v11i4.324

Abstract

Restorative justice is basically a criminal law approach that contains a number of traditional values. It is based on two indicators, namely the values ??on which it is based and the mechanisms it offers. This is the basis for considering why the existence of restorative justice is reckoned with.Restorative justiceais a process in which all parties with an interest in a particular violation meet together to resolve jointly to resolve together how to resolve the consequences of the violation for the benefit of the future. From this definition, it can be concluded that the settlement of a criminal act by using Restorative Justice prioritizes the occurrence of an agreement between the litigants, with the interests of the future. Restorative Justice was also introduced because the current criminal justice and criminal justice system created problems. In the current prison system, the purpose of punishment is deterrence, revenge, and suffering as a consequence of his actions. Sentence indicators are measured by the extent to which inmates (prisoners) are subject to prison regulations. more approach to security (security approach).The existence of this approach is perhaps as old as criminal law itself. In addition to imprisonment that has consequences for the families of prisoners, the current system is considered not to relieve or cure victims.Types of crimes that have been resolved through restorative justice are cases of persecution, domestic violence, arson, theft, and murder.The purpose of this research is to find out howImplementation of the Application of Restorative Justice Principles as an Alternative Solution to Types of Corruption Crimes in Indonesia and whether corruption cases can be resolved through the principle of restorative justice.This paper uses a normative legal writing method because it examines laws and regulations, literature, and papers related to the material being studied, which consists of the type of data obtained in this study is secondary data, namely data obtained from library research and documentation, which is the result of research and processing of others, which is already available in the form of literature or documentation.      
ANALISIS FAKTOR-FAKTOR DAN LAJU PERTUMBUHAN EKONOMI YANG MEMPENGARUHI TINGKAT KRIMINALITAS DI KOTA LUBUK LINGGAU Wawan Fransisco
Jurnal Media Ekonomi (JURMEK) Vol 23 No 2 (2018): Jurnal Media Ekonomi (JURMEK) Agustus
Publisher : LPPM UNIVERSITAS BINA INSAN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

MaiFood is a basic human need and its fulfill is a part of human rights. The food must always be available every time, and it should be in good quality, nutritious and the price should be affordable to the community. Certain system, which protect the producers and the consumers. is needed for reaching the fulfillment. In fact, there are some producers who conduct fraud in food business, namely by adding the chlorine to the food. This additive contain may harm the human health, so that food does not meet food quality standards. Based on above mentioned problems, this article will focus on the impact of the contaminated food for the health of consumers and the responsibility of the producers against loss suffered by consumers due to consumption of food (rice ) chlorine-containing materials. The impact of consuming food (rice), may cause cardiovascular disease, atherosclerosis, anemia, high blood pressure. The producers shall take responsibility by paying restitution to the consumer and the consumers do not need to prove the fault.
ANALISIS FAKTOR-FAKTOR DAN LAJU PERTUMBUHAN EKONOMI YANG MEMPENGARUHI TINGKAT KRIMINALITAS DI KOTA LUBUK LINGGAU Wawan Fransisco
Jurnal Media Ekonomi (JURMEK) Vol 24 No 2 (2019): Jurnal Media Ekonomi (JURMEK) Agustus
Publisher : LPPM UNIVERSITAS BINA INSAN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Semakin maraknya pemberitaan tentang kriminalitas yang terjadi, baik melalui media elektronik dan media lainnya hingga persepsi-persepsi dari kalangan masyarakat seakan tidak akan pernah habis untuk dibahas. Dalam perhitungan Badan Pusat Statistik, dalam 1 menit 32 detik terjadi 1 tindakan kriminal di Indonesia. Sementara itu, dari 100.000 orang di Indonesia 140 orang di antaranya beresiko terkena tindak kejahatan. Tingginya angka kriminalitas dipengaruhi oleh bebrapa faktor seperti pendidikan, hukum yang kurang tegas, tingginya tingkat pengangguran dan upah yang tidak memadai. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui motif penyebab terjadinya tindakan kriminal di Kota Lubuklinggau dan untuk mengetahui faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi terjadinya tindakan kriminal di Kota Lubuklinggau. Jenis penelitian ini merupakan jenis penelitian deskriptif kualitatif dan deskriptif kuantitatif dengan sifat penelitian yaitu explanatory. Data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah data skunder berupa data time series dari Badan Pusat Statistik dan lembaga terkait lainnya. Sedangkan sumber data lain yaitu data primer yaitu observasi yang dilakukan peneliti dan wawancara kepada beberapa pihak terkait. Metode analisis yang digunakan untuk data sekunder adalah Ordinary Least Square (OLS) dengan menggunakan regresi linier berganda. Adapun hasil penelitian ini bahwa secara parsial masing masing variabel tidak memeilki pengaruh terhadap kriminalitas yang terjadi di Kota lubuklinggau. Namun secara simultan secara bersama-sama keempat variabel yaitu pendidikan, pengangguran, PDRB dan pendapatan perkapita berpengaruh terhadap terjadinya kriminalitas di Kota Lubuklinggau. Hasil Koefisen determinasi dalam penelitian ini adalah 74,7%.
TANGGUNG JAWAB PELAKU USAHA DAN SANKSI HUKUM TERHADAP PELAKU USAHA YANG MENJUAL PRODUK REKAYASA BERAS OPLOSAN Wawan Fransisco
Jurnal Media Ekonomi (JURMEK) Vol 24 No 3 (2019): Jurnal Media Ekonomi (JURMEK) Desember
Publisher : LPPM UNIVERSITAS BINA INSAN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

MaiFood is a basic human need and its fulfill is a part of human rights. The food must always be available every time, and it should be in good quality, nutritious and the price should be affordable to the community. Certain system, which protect the producers and the consumers. is needed for reaching the fulfillment. In fact, there are some producers who conduct fraud in food business, namely by adding the chlorine to the food. This additive contain may harm the human health, so that food does not meet food quality standards. Based on above mentioned problems, this article will focus on the impact of the contaminated food for the health of consumers and the responsibility of the producers against loss suffered by consumers due to consumption of food (rice ) chlorine-containing materials. The impact of consuming food (rice), may cause cardiovascular disease, atherosclerosis, anemia, high blood pressure. The producers shall take responsibility by paying restitution to the consumer and the consumers do not need to prove the fault.
Drafting Laws for The Lifeless: A Legal Framework for Criminal Liability and Punishment for Artificial Intelligence Wawan Fransisco
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 14 No 3 (2025)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.14.3.2025.701-718

Abstract

In this modern era, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has penetrated almost every aspect of life, offering tremendous benefits to humanity. However, like two sides of a coin, AI also presents serious risks, including its use in criminal act. For example, AI-powered lethal autonomous weapons can select targets and make killing decisions without human involvement. Similarly, autonomous cars can cause fatal accidents. A crucial question arises in these cases: Who should be held accountable? Is it the developer, the owner, the user, the supervisor, or even the AI itself? In criminal law, liability requires two main elements: actus reus (wrongful act) and mens rea (malicious intent). However, is it possible for AI to have malicious intent? Can AIs be treated as legal subjects worthy of punishment? This article critically examines the legal dilemma and offers three conceptual models to enable AI criminal liability. In addition, it analyses the possibility of imposing sanctions, such as imprisonment and fines, on non-human entities, as well as the relevance of theories of punishment in the context of AI. An analysis of the benefits and risks of punishing AI is also comprehensively outlined as an alternative to other solutions.