Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Arena Hukum LEGAL BRIEF
Lucky Suryo Wicaksono
Universitas Islam Indonesia
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Comparative Study on The Legal Protection for Digital Wallet Users between Indonesia and South Korea Kurniawan Sutrisno Hadi; Lucky Suryo Wicaksono
LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 11 No. 4 (2022): October: Law Science and Field
Publisher : IHSA Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (273.995 KB)

Abstract

The Digital wallet has developed rapidly in recent years. The number of users of digital wallets has been increasing significantly over several years.  However, the financial accident related to digital wallets occurred and caused damage to the users. This study aims to analyze and determine the legal protection of digital wallet users for loss of e-money in Indonesia and Korea, and the legal issue from the Korean digital wallet regulation that can be harmonized in Indonesian’s regulation. This type of research is normative research using statutory and comparative approaches. The results of this study indicate that Indonesia carried out the legal protection for digital wallet users by prohibiting several actions, responsible for the loss of e-money by the provider unless the fault comes from the users, and sanctions. Korea carried out the legal protection for digital wallet users by ensuring the users safety, prohibition against electronic infringement, responsible for the loss caused by all types of electronic infringement, and sanctions. Then, several lessons can obtain to harmonize the digital wallet regulation in Indonesia, including the adoption single codified law, the responsible of the digital wallet provider and compensation for damage, and the response to the financial accident.
PERBANDINGAN PENGATURAN PENYELENGGARAN PENDIDIKAN PROFESI ADVOKAT (PPA) DI INDONESIA DAN AMERIKA SERIKAT Arif Setiawan; Lucky Suryo Wicaksono; Siti Anisah; Eko Rial Nugroho
Arena Hukum Vol. 10 No. 1 (2017)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (368.344 KB) | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2017.01001.7

Abstract

AbstractThis research is intended to examine the organization of advocate professional education in Indonesia and United States as well as how the organization of advocate professional education should be applied in Indonesia. This research was conducted by normative method that analyzes the data with referring to the legal norms contained in legislation and judicial decisions as well as using a comparative approach (comparative law) to United States. The results show that the First, there are differences in the organization of Advocate Education in Indonesia and United States. Organization of advocate professional education in the United States conducted by the law school while in Indonesia carried out by the Advocates organization. Secondly, Advocates professional education in Indonesia should not be in the form of Special Education Advocate Profession (PKPA). Special Education Advocate Profession actually is a form of professional education. Professional Education as part of a higher education course should meet national standards of higher education. AbstrakAdvokat merupakan salah satu profesi hukum yang memiliki peran penting dalam system peradilan pidana Indonesia. Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji pengaturan penyelenggaraan pendidikan profesi advokat di Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat serta bagaimana penyelenggaraan pendidikan profesi advokat yang seharusnya diterapkan di Indonesia. Tulisan ini merupakan hasil dari satu penelitian yang menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan menggunakan pendekatan perbandingan hukum (comparative law) terhadap Amerika Serikat.  Hasil penelitian tersebut menunjukan bahwa penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Profesi Advokat di Amerika dilakukan oleh sekolah hukum sedangkan di Indonesia dilakukan oleh organisasi Advokat. Pendidikan profesi Advokat di Indonesia seharusnya bukan dalam bentuk Pendidikan Khusus Profesi Advokat. Pendidikan Profesi Advokat sejatinya merupakan bentuk pendidikan profesi. Pendidikan Profesi Advokat sebagai bagian dari pendidikan tinggi tentunya harus memunuhi standar nasional pendidikan tinggi.
Co-Authors Arif Setiawan Eko Rial Nugroho, Eko Rial Kurniawan Sutrisno Hadi Siti Anisah