Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Gema
Sindura Debri Walanti Bagas Pradikta Haryanto, Sindura Debri Walanti
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
TINJAUAN KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN KETERANGAN SAKSI YANG TIDAK DISUMPAH KARENA KETERBELAKANGAN MENTAL DALAM PEMERIKSAAN PERKARA KEKERASAN SEKSUAL (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Lubuk Basung Nomor : 104/Pid.B/2013/PN.LB.BS) Bagas Pradikta Haryanto, Sindura Debri Walanti
GEMA Vol 27, No 50 (2015): GEMA, THN XXVII/50/Pebruari - Juli 2015
Publisher : GEMA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (11.269 KB)

Abstract

This study aims to determine whether the provision of statements of witnesses who are not sworn as clicking natural mental retardation is not contrary to the KUHAP and how the attitude of the judges in considering the testimony of witnesses who are not sworn as mentally retarded to decide cases of sexual violence in the Lubuk Basung First Instance Court. This research includes the study of normative law with prescriptive nature. The approach used by the researchers is a case study. Source of data used in the writing of this law is the secondary data, which use materials that can be ruling literature, legislation, documents, books, and literature related to the problem under study. Technical analysis is a method of data used by the pattern of thinking deductive syllogism. Based on this study we concluded that the witness testimony given by witnesses with mental retardation with no sworn not contradict or are in accordance with the provisions of the KUHAP. Probative value attached to the sworn testimony of the witnesses who are not able to strengthen the confidence of Judges and can be used as a guide for an additional judge and as valid evidence, as long as the information is in accordance with other valid evidence.
Co-Authors