Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Uniqbu Journal of Social Sciences
Samsu T
Lecturer and Student of English Department, Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidenreng Rappang, Indonesia,
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
NATIONAL EDUCATIONAL CHARACTERS ON ENGLISH HAND BOOK USED BY ENGLISH AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE (EFL) TEACHERS Samsu T; Andi Sadapotto
Uniqbu Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022): Uniqbu Journal of Social Sciences (UJSS)
Publisher : LPPM UNIQBU

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47323/ujss.v3i2.216

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the English textbooks used by teachers in the learning and teaching process and to determine the suitability of the character education values ​​in English textbooks with the character education values ​​set in the 2013 curriculum. The English text used is 12 values ​​of character education out of 18 total values ​​of character education in the 2013 curriculum. The research design used is descriptive qualitative research method because the data collected is in the form of words and does not use numbers. The researcher chose this method because the data obtained were descriptive data, then analyzed and described in the form of words and language. descriptive qualitative is a research method that utilizes qualitative data and is described descriptively. The results showed that the value of character education in English textbooks used by teachers in the teaching and learning process did not fully contain the value of character education in the 2013 curriculum. There were only 12 values ​​of character education from 18 values ​​of character education based on the 2013 curriculum in the English textbook. Which means that there are 6 values ​​of character education based on the 2013 curriculum that are not contained in the English textbook. As a conclusion, the suitability between the values ​​of character education in English textbooks and character education in the 2013 curriculum is not fully appropriate.
Co-Authors Andi Sadapotto