Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Collaborative Learning and Mini Research Assignments on The History of Islamic Educational Thought: The Impact of Students' Critical Thinking Ability Amrullah, Amrullah; Mustofa, Muhammad; Fuhaidah, Ulya
Al-Tadzkiyyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Vol 13 No 1 (2022): Al-Tadzkiyyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24042/atjpi.v13i1.10550

This study aims to determine the effect of collaborative learning models and mini research assignments on the critical thinking skills of Postgraduate Students of the Islamic Education Study Program (PAI) of the State Institute of Islamic Studies (IAIN) Curup. The research design used in this study was non-experimental. The sampling technique used was total sampling by taking the entire population as research respondents. The sample in this study was the first-semester Postgraduate students in Class A and B of IAIN Curup. They have taken the History of Islamic Educational Thinking Course in the Academic Year of 2021-2022. Based on the statistical analysis to determine the relationship between collaborative learning and critical thinking skills, the tobserved (9. 110) was more significant than the tcritical (2,056). Furthermore, the obtained tobserved (26,674) was more significant than the tcritical (2,056) to determine the relationship between mini research assignments and critical thinking skills. The analysis also shows that Fobserved (571.6) was more significant than Fcritical (3.34). Therefore can be concluded, there was an effect of collaborative learning, partially and simultaneously, on the critical thinking skills of IAIN Curup Postgraduate Students.

Analisis Peluang Kedaulatan Negara Palestina Fuhaidah, Ulya
Jurnal Review Politik Vol. 2 No. 1 (2012): Juni
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Filsafat UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

This article aims to uncover the conflict in Palestine and how the future of Palestine. The conflict in Palestine resulted in endless political chaotic even though there is a resolution of bilateral and international intervention. The future of Israeli-Palestinian peace seems just something utopian considering negotiation efforts always fail applied. The findings of research indicate that the establishment of a sovereign Palestinian state is only a dream except the following three factors manifest, first, the merging of the two political factions; Hamas and Fatah in realizing its independence; second, recognition of Israel against the Palestinian authorities so that they can coexist peacefully; and third, such as Mahmoud Ahmedi Nejad statement, "Sending home Jewish community to Europe.”

Islamic Law, International Humanitarian Law, and Indonesia’s Diplomacy: A Constructivist Reading of Prabowo’s UNGA Speech on Gaza, 2025 Fuhaidah, Ulya; Wijaya, Roma
Islamic Law and Social Issues in Society Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Islamic Law and Social Issues in Society
Publisher : Tuah Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64929/ilsiis.v2i1.43

Studies on the normative overlap between Islamic law and International Humanitarian Law (IHL) have consistently shown how both traditions converge in their commitment to human dignity. What has received far less attention is how this convergence travels into the practice of state diplomacy and shapes the construction of foreign policy identity. This article takes up that question by reading President Prabowo Subianto’s 2025 address to the UN General Assembly as a diplomatic text through which the convergence between maqāṣid al-sharīʿah and IHL is articulated and publicly justified in Indonesia’s response to the Gaza crisis. The central argument is that Prabowo’s speech frames Indonesian foreign policy as value-based diplomacy anchored in Islamic ethics and in widely recognized humanitarian norms. Using qualitative content analysis within a constructivist framework, the study treats maqāṣid al-sharīʿah not only as an ethical doctrine but as a normative resource that informs identity construction and shapes diplomatic conduct. The analysis shows that Prabowo’s speech reflects an Indonesian foreign policy grounded in justice and humanity and draws the protection of life (ḥifẓ al-nafs), justice (ʿadl), and global solidarity into a single ethical vocabulary that projects Islamic values into modern diplomacy. Read together, these findings suggest that Indonesia’s diplomacy operates as a site of cross-civilizational moral articulation, linking Islamic ethics with universal humanitarian standards while contributing to a more inclusive and morally grounded diplomatic paradigm. The article thus contributes to constructivist international relations scholarship by showing how religious normative frameworks can serve as intersubjective sources of international norms that shape state identity and diplomatic behavior. On that basis, it proposes a value-based humanitarian diplomacy model that bridges Islamic ethics and contemporary humanitarian law in global political practice.

Islamic Law, International Humanitarian Law, and Indonesia’s Diplomacy: A Constructivist Reading of Prabowo’s UNGA Speech on Gaza, 2025 Fuhaidah, Ulya; Wijaya, Roma
Islamic Law and Social Issues in Society Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Islamic Law and Social Issues in Society
Publisher : Tuah Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64929/ilsiis.v2i1.43

Studies on the normative overlap between Islamic law and International Humanitarian Law (IHL) have consistently shown how both traditions converge in their commitment to human dignity. What has received far less attention is how this convergence travels into the practice of state diplomacy and shapes the construction of foreign policy identity. This article takes up that question by reading President Prabowo Subianto’s 2025 address to the UN General Assembly as a diplomatic text through which the convergence between maqāṣid al-sharīʿah and IHL is articulated and publicly justified in Indonesia’s response to the Gaza crisis. The central argument is that Prabowo’s speech frames Indonesian foreign policy as value-based diplomacy anchored in Islamic ethics and in widely recognized humanitarian norms. Using qualitative content analysis within a constructivist framework, the study treats maqāṣid al-sharīʿah not only as an ethical doctrine but as a normative resource that informs identity construction and shapes diplomatic conduct. The analysis shows that Prabowo’s speech reflects an Indonesian foreign policy grounded in justice and humanity and draws the protection of life (ḥifẓ al-nafs), justice (ʿadl), and global solidarity into a single ethical vocabulary that projects Islamic values into modern diplomacy. Read together, these findings suggest that Indonesia’s diplomacy operates as a site of cross-civilizational moral articulation, linking Islamic ethics with universal humanitarian standards while contributing to a more inclusive and morally grounded diplomatic paradigm. The article thus contributes to constructivist international relations scholarship by showing how religious normative frameworks can serve as intersubjective sources of international norms that shape state identity and diplomatic behavior. On that basis, it proposes a value-based humanitarian diplomacy model that bridges Islamic ethics and contemporary humanitarian law in global political practice.

Title

Found 4 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 4 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 4 Documents
Search