Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Justitia et Pax JHR (Jurnal Hukum Replik)
Astrya Puspitasari
Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
THE ROLE OF FORENSIC LABORATORIES IN PROVING POISON MURDERS IN INDONESIA Astrya Puspitasari; Diya Ul Akmal
JHR (Jurnal Hukum Replik) Vol 10, No 2 (2022): JURNAL HUKUM REPLIK
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31000/jhr.v10i2.6750

Abstract

Murder is a heinous crime that violates the law and threatens humanity. Murder can be committed in a variety of ways, one of which is through the use of poison. To solve a Poisoning Murder case, investigators must have a high level of expertise as well as the use of a Forensic Laboratory to examine scientific evidence. The murder of Wayan Mirna Salihin (Mirna) with Cyanide is one example. This study uses a Normative Legal Method that is bolstered by primary data analysis. The data used are Primary Data (Interviews) and Secondary Data (Legislation, Books, Journals, and Internet Sources). The obtained data is described using words based on scientific logic. The Mirna Cyanide murder case is so complicated that it necessitates the involvement of the Forensic Laboratory and forensic experts from various fields. Expert Testimony from Forensic Doctors, Forensic Toxicologists, and Forensic Digital Experts were obtained as part of the evidence. In this case, Expert Testimony is crucial in confirming the judge's conviction of the suspect who murdered Mirna. Jessica Kumala Wongso (Jessica) was eventually found guilty and sentenced to 20 years in prison by the judge. This emphasizes the importance of the Forensic Laboratory in proving Poison Murder cases.
KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN HASIL PEMERIKSAAN LABORATORIUM FORENSIK SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI DALAM KASUS TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN Astrya Puspitasari; Diya Ul Akmal
Justitia et Pax Vol. 38 No. 2 (2022): Justitia et Pax Volume 38 Nomor 2 Tahun 2022
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Murder is a crime that both violates humanity and the law. Murders can be influenced by a variety of factors, including personal issues, economic hardships, and other concerns. The process of investigating murder cases necessitates the use of a Forensic Laboratory Examination to identify evidence and clues that will be used as legal evidence in court later. The aim of the research is to examine the role of evidence from Forensic Laboratory examination results in developing a judge's conviction in a murder case. This is a qualitative study that employs a normative legal method. The data used are secondary data gathered from literature studies and interviews at the National Police Headquarters Forensic Laboratory Center. In general, Forensic Laboratory examination results are utilized as evidence and instructions that can corroborate evidence. The Forensic Laboratory examination results can be utilized as documentary evidence (visum et repertum), expert testimonies, and evidence directives. The Forensic Laboratory investigation's findings are crucial in determining the judge's conviction, particularly in cases of murder. The judge's conviction must be founded on the fact that the defendant committed murder. As a result, the role of proving the Forensic Laboratory examination results is expected to guide the judge's conviction to get material truth. The expected implication is that the values of justice will be fulfilled in the Indonesian criminal justice system.
Co-Authors Diya Ul Akmal