Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.332
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Wikrama Parahita : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Journal of Innovation and Future Technology (IFTECH) Journal of Dinda : Data Science, Information Technology, and Data Analytics Jurnal Dharmabakti Nagri Jurnal Informatika: Jurnal Pengembangan IT
Tb Ai Munandar
Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya
Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Library & Information Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Informatika: Jurnal Pengembangan IT

 1 
Perangkingan Pegawai Untuk Menentukan Penerima Bonus Akhir Tahun Menggunakan Teknik ELECTRE Pada BPR Rasyid Tb Ai Munandar
Jurnal Informatika: Jurnal Pengembangan IT Vol 8, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Politeknik Harapan Bersama

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30591/jpit.v8i2.4882

Abstract

Employee rankings can be done for various needs, one of which relates to year-end bonuses. So far, the awarding of year-end bonuses to research objects has only relied on one criterion, namely targets and achievements. In fact, there are many other indicators that can be assessed, such as attendance, discipline, communication style, cooperation, and initiative. This study aims to provide an alternative computation-based employee ranking method with multi-attribute decision making (MADM). The Elimination and Choice Translation of Reality (ELECTRE) technique is used in research to rank employee data based on their attribute values. The results of the study show that, of the ten employees assessed, four alternatives (employees) are recommended to be selected based on the results of a comparison of the dominant aggregate values. In this study, it can also be seen that alternative 6 (Alt-6) is the strongest alternative to be recommended for selection. Because alternative 6 (Alt-6) is not only better than alternatives 1, 4, 8, 9, and 10, but also better than alternative 3 (Alt-3) and alternative 4 (Alt-4). The order of the second, third, and fourth alternatives, respectively, are alternatives 5, 7, and 8. The recommendations of these four employees can be used as decision-making material for policymakers, given the need to award year-end bonuses.
Co-Authors Agus Setyawan Ahmad Dedi Jubaedi Ajif Yunizar Pratama Yusuf Dwipa Handayani Fata Nidaul Khasanah Harsiti Harsiti Rizki Alamsyah Siti Setiawati Tyastuti Sri Lestari