Naufal Luthfi Alifa
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

DAMPAK PEMIKIRAN TEOLOGIS SALAFIYYAH BAGI KEMASLAHATAN UMAT Ayu Nisrina Indah Sari; Devia Anggarista Tasuhi Kusuma; Naufal Luthfi Alifa
Jurnal An-Nufus Vol 3 No 02 (2021): Juli-Desember (2021)
Publisher : Prodi Tasawuf dan Psikoterapi, Fakultas Agama Islam, Universitas Muhammadiyah Cirebon

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article discusses the role of three Islamic theologians in the treasures of Islamic thought. The three figures are Ibn Taymiyyah, Ibn Jauziyah, and Abdul Wahab. All three have important contributions and have a strong influence on Muslims to this day. Moreover, along with the development of Islamic teachings, the Muslim community adheres to different theological schools. One of these schools is the Salafiyyah school. The three figures we discussed also fall into the category of this Salafiyyah school. In this research, we use a qualitative methodology based on an analysis of the Islamic literature review. First, we briefly describe the meaning of Salaf and Salafiyyah, then we briefly describe the biographies of three Salafiyyah figures or theologians and their thoughts on monotheism and its impact on the benefit of the people. Some of the results of this research include: the thoughts of Ibn Taimiyyah, Ibn Jauziyyah, and Abdul Wahab are based on three main principles: (1) prioritizing the revealed text over reason; (2) rejecting theological issues (kalam); and (3) strict adherence to the Koran, Hadith, and ijma'.
Perbandingan Dinamika Kelembagaan Ekonomi Islam antara Indonesia, Arab Saudi, dan Thailand: Analisis terhadap Perkembangan dan Tantangan di Era Modernisasi Cintya, Putri; Naufal Luthfi Alifa
Al Rikaz: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Vol 4 No 1 (2025): Al Rikaz: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah
Publisher : Program Studi Ekonomi Syariah IAIN Parepare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35905/rikaz.v4i1.15291

Abstract

This study compares Islamic economic institutions in Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, and Thailand through four focuses: (1) institutional profile, (2) development dynamics, (3) regulatory and literacy challenges, and (4) reflection on Islamic economic growth. Using a comparative qualitative approach through literature review, the study finds that Indonesia leads in digitalization, Saudi Arabia shows institutional maturity aligned with Vision 2030, while Thailand remains in early development. Collaboration among governments, financial institutions, and communities is key to creating an inclusive and sustainable Islamic economic system. Indonesia continues to strengthen its ecosystem through digital innovation. Overall, the study highlights the importance of harmonizing regulation, improving human capital, and enhancing cross-country cooperation to reinforce institutional resilience and advance sustainable Islamic economic development.
Comparison of Islamic Economic Institutions in United Arab Emirates and Russia for Indonesia’s Sustainable Development Pamungkas Putra, Bayu Euro; Naufal Luthfi Alifa
Jurnal Internasional Ekonomi Islam Vol 7 No 02 (2025): International Journal of Islamic Economics
Publisher : The Postgraduate of Institut Agama Islam Negeri Metro Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/ijie.v7i02.11807

Abstract

Introduction: Islamic economics emerges as an alternative system emphasizing justice, ethics, and sustainability amid global economic challenges. The United Arab Emirates and Russia represent two contrasting contexts, with the United Arab Emirates as a Muslim-majority nation and Russia as a non-Muslim state, yet both demonstrate significant institutional development of Islamic economics. Objective: This study aims to compare the institutional dynamics of Islamic economic systems in the United Arab Emirates and Russia and analyze their implications for strengthening sustainable Islamic economic development in Indonesia. Method: The study uses a qualitative method with a comparative case study approach. Data were obtained from government policies, official financial reports, and reputable academic journals discussing Islamic finance development in both countries. Analysis was conducted descriptively and comparatively through data reduction, presentation, and conclusion drawing. Result: The United Arab Emirates has successfully institutionalized Islamic finance through strong regulatory frameworks, integrated governance, and technological innovation, positioning Dubai as a global hub for Islamic finance. Meanwhile, Russia has adopted an adaptive and educational approach by developing Islamic finance in regions such as Tatarstan within a hybrid legal system and through international collaboration, despite operating under a secular framework. Implication: The study concludes that Indonesia can integrate the United Arab Emirates’s regulatory strength and Russia’s social inclusivity to build an ethical, inclusive, and sustainable Islamic economic institution aligned with maqasid al-shariah and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
PERBANDINGAN MODEL KELEMBAGAAN EKONOMI ISLAM DI UNI EMIRAT ARAB DAN INGGRIS: ANALISIS STATE-DRIVEN DAN MARKET-DRIVEN Annisa Nur Aini; Naufal Luthfi Alifa
Revenue : Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan dan Ekonomi Islam Vol 8 No 02 (2025): Revenue : Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan dan Ekonomi Islam
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Bakti Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56998/76bwj376

Abstract

Perkembangan ekonomi Islam global periode 2020–2025 menunjukkan penguatan signifikan pada aspek kelembagaan yang menjadi fondasi sistem keuangan syariah. Uni Emirat Arab (UEA) dan Inggris merupakan dua negara dengan pendekatan kelembagaan berbeda, namun keduanya memainkan peran strategis dalam arsitektur ekonomi Islam global. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis dinamika kelembagaan ekonomi Islam di kedua negara dengan menekankan aspek penerapan model kelembagaan, tantangan strategis, serta refleksi kelembagaan berdasarkan kajian literatur terkini. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif-deskriptif melalui studi kepustakaan terhadap laporan regulator, publikasi ilmiah, dan dokumen internasional periode 2020–2025. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa UEA mengadopsi model kelembagaan berbasis negara (state-driven model) melalui koordinasi regulatif terpusat dan harmonisasi standar syariah, sedangkan Inggris menerapkan model berbasis pasar (market-driven model) dengan fleksibilitas regulatif dan inovasi produk keuangan syariah. Refleksi kelembagaan menunjukkan bahwa efektivitas institusi bergantung pada kualitas regulasi, kesiapan infrastruktur digital, serta kemampuan adaptasi terhadap dinamika pasar global.
Perbandingan Dinamika Kelembagaan Ekonomi Islam Brunei dengan India dan Implikasinya Bagi Indonesia: A Comparative Analysis of Islamic Economic Institutional Dynamics in Brunei and India, and Its Implications for Indonesia Indra Maolana; Naufal Luthfi Alifa
Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan Syariah Vol 5 No 1 (2026): April 2026
Publisher : FAKULTAS EKONOMI DAN BISNIS ISLAM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24260/jkubs.v5i1.5300

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to analyze and compare the dynamics of Islamic economic institutions in Brunei Darussalam and India, as well as to examine their implications for strengthening Islamic economic institutions in Indonesia. Design/methodology/approach: The study employs a comparative qualitative approach using literature analysis from international journals, regulatory documents, and actual institutional practices in both countries. Research Findings: The findings reveal that Brunei, as a Muslim-majority country, has developed Islamic economic institutions in a structured manner through strong state support, integration of maqasid sharia into public policy, and synergy between regulators and Islamic financial institutions. In contrast, India, as a non-Muslim-majority country, demonstrates a more community-based institutional dynamic that emphasizes social inclusion through Islamic microfinance institutions and informal cooperatives. The study suggests that Indonesia can adopt a hybrid institutional model that combines Brunei’s regulatory strength with India’s community participation to build a more adaptive and sustainable Islamic economic ecosystem.  Contribution/Originality/Novelty: The novelty of this study lies in its cross-country comparative analysis that connects institutional characteristics with demographic and political contexts. It offers an alternative institutional model for Indonesia that aligns with the maqasid sharia principles and responds to local socio-economic challenges.
Dinamika Kelembagaan Ekonomi Islam Dalam Pengembangan Wakaf Produktif Di Qatar-Singapura Dan Implikasinya Bagi Indonesia Muhammad Refan Alfarel; Naufal Luthfi Alifa
WELFARE: Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Vol 4, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Prodi Perbankan Syariah UIN Sumatera Utara Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30821/wifi.v4i2.27602

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis bagaimana karakter geografis, demografis, dan ekonomi Qatar dan Singapura membentuk model kelembagaan wakaf produktif, serta menelaah relevansinya bagi penguatan tata kelola wakaf di Indonesia. Metode yang digunakan adalah pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif melalui analisis dokumen secara sistematis untuk memahami struktur kelembagaan, kerangka regulasi, dan strategi manajerial yang diterapkan di kedua negara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Qatar mengembangkan model kelembagaan yang bersifat state-driven dengan dukungan kapasitas fiskal yang kuat, sehingga memungkinkan pengelolaan aset wakaf secara terpusat dan terarah pada perencanaan pembangunan jangka panjang. Sebaliknya, Singapura menerapkan model regulatory-governance yang menekankan profesionalisasi, transparansi, dan konsolidasi aset sehingga wakaf dapat berfungsi produktif meskipun berada di negara dengan minoritas Muslim. Analisis komparatif mengungkap adanya kesenjangan kelembagaan di Indonesia, terutama terkait fragmentasi pengelolaan, rendahnya profesionalisme nadzir, dan belum optimalnya integrasi aset. Penelitian ini menegaskan perlunya Indonesia membangun model kelembagaan hibrida yang menggabungkan koordinasi negara dengan praktik pengelolaan profesional berbasis pasar. Penguatan regulasi, konsolidasi aset, peningkatan kapasitas nadzir, serta perluasan instrumen investasi inovatif menjadi langkah kunci untuk mengoptimalkan peran wakaf produktif dalam mendukung pembangunan nasional.