Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

DAMPAK PEMIKIRAN TEOLOGIS SALAFIYYAH BAGI KEMASLAHATAN UMAT Ayu Nisrina Indah Sari; Devia Anggarista Tasuhi Kusuma; Naufal Luthfi Alifa
Jurnal An-Nufus Vol 3 No 02 (2021): Juli-Desember (2021)
Publisher : Prodi Tasawuf dan Psikoterapi, Fakultas Agama Islam, Universitas Muhammadiyah Cirebon

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article discusses the role of three Islamic theologians in the treasures of Islamic thought. The three figures are Ibn Taymiyyah, Ibn Jauziyah, and Abdul Wahab. All three have important contributions and have a strong influence on Muslims to this day. Moreover, along with the development of Islamic teachings, the Muslim community adheres to different theological schools. One of these schools is the Salafiyyah school. The three figures we discussed also fall into the category of this Salafiyyah school. In this research, we use a qualitative methodology based on an analysis of the Islamic literature review. First, we briefly describe the meaning of Salaf and Salafiyyah, then we briefly describe the biographies of three Salafiyyah figures or theologians and their thoughts on monotheism and its impact on the benefit of the people. Some of the results of this research include: the thoughts of Ibn Taimiyyah, Ibn Jauziyyah, and Abdul Wahab are based on three main principles: (1) prioritizing the revealed text over reason; (2) rejecting theological issues (kalam); and (3) strict adherence to the Koran, Hadith, and ijma'.
Perbandingan Dinamika Kelembagaan Ekonomi Islam antara Indonesia, Arab Saudi, dan Thailand: Analisis terhadap Perkembangan dan Tantangan di Era Modernisasi Cintya, Putri; Naufal Luthfi Alifa
Al Rikaz: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Vol 4 No 1 (2025): Al Rikaz: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah
Publisher : Program Studi Ekonomi Syariah IAIN Parepare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35905/rikaz.v4i1.15291

Abstract

This study compares Islamic economic institutions in Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, and Thailand through four focuses: (1) institutional profile, (2) development dynamics, (3) regulatory and literacy challenges, and (4) reflection on Islamic economic growth. Using a comparative qualitative approach through literature review, the study finds that Indonesia leads in digitalization, Saudi Arabia shows institutional maturity aligned with Vision 2030, while Thailand remains in early development. Collaboration among governments, financial institutions, and communities is key to creating an inclusive and sustainable Islamic economic system. Indonesia continues to strengthen its ecosystem through digital innovation. Overall, the study highlights the importance of harmonizing regulation, improving human capital, and enhancing cross-country cooperation to reinforce institutional resilience and advance sustainable Islamic economic development.
Perbandingan Dinamika Kelembagaan Ekonomi Islam di Pakistan dan Inggris: Perspektif Peran Regulasi dan Inovasi Produk Silvia Dea Lova; Naufal Luthfi Alifa
Jurnal Bersama Ilmu Ekonomi (EKONOM) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2025): November 2025
Publisher : Yayasan Literasi Sains Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55123/ekonom.v1i4.334

Abstract

This study aims to comparatively analyze the dynamics of Islamic economic institutions in Pakistan and the United Kingdom, focusing on evaluating major challenges and formulating adaptive and innovative institutional strengthening strategies to promote stability and inclusion in Islamic finance, while providing applicative reflections for sustainable economic development in Indonesia. The research employs a qualitative approach with comparative and descriptive study design, involving data collection through literature review and thematic content analysis to ensure validity through triangulation. Key findings reveal that in Pakistan, Islamic economic institutions develop through low-risk Sharia mutual funds and Islamic banking with strong liquidity but face challenges of low profitability due to non-performing loans and limited instruments; whereas in the UK, regulatory support and product innovations like sukuk drive growth, despite challenges in public literacy and infrastructure. The interpretation of results emphasizes integrating regulatory strengthening, product innovation, and literacy enhancement as primary strategies, concluding that this comparative model can serve as a foundation for developing Islamic economics in Indonesia that supports sustainable, inclusive, and socially-environmentally oriented MSMEs.
Comparison of Islamic Economic Institutions in United Arab Emirates and Russia for Indonesia’s Sustainable Development Pamungkas Putra, Bayu Euro; Naufal Luthfi Alifa
Jurnal Internasional Ekonomi Islam Vol 7 No 02 (2025): International Journal of Islamic Economics
Publisher : The Postgraduate of Institut Agama Islam Negeri Metro Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/ijie.v7i02.11807

Abstract

Introduction: Islamic economics emerges as an alternative system emphasizing justice, ethics, and sustainability amid global economic challenges. The United Arab Emirates and Russia represent two contrasting contexts, with the United Arab Emirates as a Muslim-majority nation and Russia as a non-Muslim state, yet both demonstrate significant institutional development of Islamic economics. Objective: This study aims to compare the institutional dynamics of Islamic economic systems in the United Arab Emirates and Russia and analyze their implications for strengthening sustainable Islamic economic development in Indonesia. Method: The study uses a qualitative method with a comparative case study approach. Data were obtained from government policies, official financial reports, and reputable academic journals discussing Islamic finance development in both countries. Analysis was conducted descriptively and comparatively through data reduction, presentation, and conclusion drawing. Result: The United Arab Emirates has successfully institutionalized Islamic finance through strong regulatory frameworks, integrated governance, and technological innovation, positioning Dubai as a global hub for Islamic finance. Meanwhile, Russia has adopted an adaptive and educational approach by developing Islamic finance in regions such as Tatarstan within a hybrid legal system and through international collaboration, despite operating under a secular framework. Implication: The study concludes that Indonesia can integrate the United Arab Emirates’s regulatory strength and Russia’s social inclusivity to build an ethical, inclusive, and sustainable Islamic economic institution aligned with maqasid al-shariah and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
PERBANDINGAN MODEL KELEMBAGAAN EKONOMI ISLAM DI UNI EMIRAT ARAB DAN INGGRIS: ANALISIS STATE-DRIVEN DAN MARKET-DRIVEN Annisa Nur Aini; Naufal Luthfi Alifa
Revenue : Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan dan Ekonomi Islam Vol 8 No 02 (2025): Revenue : Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan dan Ekonomi Islam
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Bakti Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56998/76bwj376

Abstract

Perkembangan ekonomi Islam global periode 2020–2025 menunjukkan penguatan signifikan pada aspek kelembagaan yang menjadi fondasi sistem keuangan syariah. Uni Emirat Arab (UEA) dan Inggris merupakan dua negara dengan pendekatan kelembagaan berbeda, namun keduanya memainkan peran strategis dalam arsitektur ekonomi Islam global. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis dinamika kelembagaan ekonomi Islam di kedua negara dengan menekankan aspek penerapan model kelembagaan, tantangan strategis, serta refleksi kelembagaan berdasarkan kajian literatur terkini. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif-deskriptif melalui studi kepustakaan terhadap laporan regulator, publikasi ilmiah, dan dokumen internasional periode 2020–2025. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa UEA mengadopsi model kelembagaan berbasis negara (state-driven model) melalui koordinasi regulatif terpusat dan harmonisasi standar syariah, sedangkan Inggris menerapkan model berbasis pasar (market-driven model) dengan fleksibilitas regulatif dan inovasi produk keuangan syariah. Refleksi kelembagaan menunjukkan bahwa efektivitas institusi bergantung pada kualitas regulasi, kesiapan infrastruktur digital, serta kemampuan adaptasi terhadap dinamika pasar global.
Perbandingan Implementasi dan Regulasi Kelembagaan Keuangan Syariah Malaysia–Thailand serta Implikasinya bagi Indonesia Ramadhani, Muhammad Rizka; Naufal Luthfi Alifa
Iltizam : Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Islam Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Iltizam : Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Islam
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Ekonomi Islam Universitas Ibrahimy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35316/iltizam.v3i2.8459

Abstract

Studi ini menyajikan analisis komparatif mengenai implementasi dan regulasi kelembagaan keuangan syariah di Malaysia, Thailand, dan Indonesia untuk mengidentifikasi kekuatan, tantangan, dan peluang pengembangan di kawasan Asia Tenggara. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif berbasis studi pustaka, temuan menunjukkan bahwa Malaysia berada di posisi terdepan berkat sistem kelembagaan yang kuat dan regulasi komprehensif seperti Islamic Financial Services Act (IFSA) 2013 serta dukungan Shariah Advisory Council (SAC). Thailand mengembangkan keuangan syariah melalui pendekatan inklusif lewat sistem Islamic Banking Window dan Islamic Bank of Thailand (iBank) yang mendukung aktivitas ekonomi muslim minoritas. Indonesia memiliki potensi besar namun menghadapi fragmentasi regulasi antara OJK, BI, dan DSN–MUI serta rendahnya literasi keuangan syariah. Hasil perbandingan menegaskan bahwa integrasi kelembagaan dan inovasi digital merupakan faktor kunci bagi kemajuan, sehingga Indonesia perlu mengadopsi kekuatan regulasi Malaysia dan model inklusi sosial Thailand.