Naufal Luthfi Alifa
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

DAMPAK PEMIKIRAN TEOLOGIS SALAFIYYAH BAGI KEMASLAHATAN UMAT Ayu Nisrina Indah Sari; Devia Anggarista Tasuhi Kusuma; Naufal Luthfi Alifa
Jurnal An-Nufus Vol 3 No 02 (2021): Juli-Desember (2021)
Publisher : Prodi Tasawuf dan Psikoterapi, Fakultas Agama Islam, Universitas Muhammadiyah Cirebon

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article discusses the role of three Islamic theologians in the treasures of Islamic thought. The three figures are Ibn Taymiyyah, Ibn Jauziyah, and Abdul Wahab. All three have important contributions and have a strong influence on Muslims to this day. Moreover, along with the development of Islamic teachings, the Muslim community adheres to different theological schools. One of these schools is the Salafiyyah school. The three figures we discussed also fall into the category of this Salafiyyah school. In this research, we use a qualitative methodology based on an analysis of the Islamic literature review. First, we briefly describe the meaning of Salaf and Salafiyyah, then we briefly describe the biographies of three Salafiyyah figures or theologians and their thoughts on monotheism and its impact on the benefit of the people. Some of the results of this research include: the thoughts of Ibn Taimiyyah, Ibn Jauziyyah, and Abdul Wahab are based on three main principles: (1) prioritizing the revealed text over reason; (2) rejecting theological issues (kalam); and (3) strict adherence to the Koran, Hadith, and ijma'.
Perbandingan Dinamika Kelembagaan Ekonomi Islam antara Indonesia, Arab Saudi, dan Thailand: Analisis terhadap Perkembangan dan Tantangan di Era Modernisasi Cintya, Putri; Naufal Luthfi Alifa
Al Rikaz: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Vol 4 No 1 (2025): Al Rikaz: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah
Publisher : Program Studi Ekonomi Syariah IAIN Parepare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35905/rikaz.v4i1.15291

Abstract

This study compares Islamic economic institutions in Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, and Thailand through four focuses: (1) institutional profile, (2) development dynamics, (3) regulatory and literacy challenges, and (4) reflection on Islamic economic growth. Using a comparative qualitative approach through literature review, the study finds that Indonesia leads in digitalization, Saudi Arabia shows institutional maturity aligned with Vision 2030, while Thailand remains in early development. Collaboration among governments, financial institutions, and communities is key to creating an inclusive and sustainable Islamic economic system. Indonesia continues to strengthen its ecosystem through digital innovation. Overall, the study highlights the importance of harmonizing regulation, improving human capital, and enhancing cross-country cooperation to reinforce institutional resilience and advance sustainable Islamic economic development.
Perbandingan Dinamika Kelembagaan Ekonomi Islam di Pakistan dan Inggris: Perspektif Peran Regulasi dan Inovasi Produk Silvia Dea Lova; Naufal Luthfi Alifa
Jurnal Bersama Ilmu Ekonomi (EKONOM) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2025): November 2025
Publisher : Yayasan Literasi Sains Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55123/ekonom.v1i4.334

Abstract

This study aims to comparatively analyze the dynamics of Islamic economic institutions in Pakistan and the United Kingdom, focusing on evaluating major challenges and formulating adaptive and innovative institutional strengthening strategies to promote stability and inclusion in Islamic finance, while providing applicative reflections for sustainable economic development in Indonesia. The research employs a qualitative approach with comparative and descriptive study design, involving data collection through literature review and thematic content analysis to ensure validity through triangulation. Key findings reveal that in Pakistan, Islamic economic institutions develop through low-risk Sharia mutual funds and Islamic banking with strong liquidity but face challenges of low profitability due to non-performing loans and limited instruments; whereas in the UK, regulatory support and product innovations like sukuk drive growth, despite challenges in public literacy and infrastructure. The interpretation of results emphasizes integrating regulatory strengthening, product innovation, and literacy enhancement as primary strategies, concluding that this comparative model can serve as a foundation for developing Islamic economics in Indonesia that supports sustainable, inclusive, and socially-environmentally oriented MSMEs.