Yesheca Gracia Christian
Program Studi Akuntansi, Trisakti School of Management Jl. Kyai Tapa No.20, RT.1/RW.9, Tomang, Kec. Grogol petamburan, Kota Jakarta Barat, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 11440

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

Keputusan Etis Konsultan Pajak: Pentingnya Tanggung Jawab Sosial dan Machiavellianisme Yesheca Gracia Christian; Yulius Kurnia Susanto
Studi Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia Vol 4 No 2 (2021): Studi Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia (SAKI)
Publisher : Universitas Prasetiya Mulya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21632/saki.4.2.156-177

Abstract

This research objective is to get evidence about the effect of perception of the importance of ethical and social responsibility, Machiavellianism, ethical reasoning, idealism, experience, and professional commitment to ethical decision-making of tax consultants. Data were obtained from the questionnaire. This research used the convenience sampling method. This study used 60 tax consultants as the study samples in DKI Jakarta, and the data were analyzed using multiple regression analysis. This research showed that the perception of the importance of ethical and social responsibility, Machiavellianism, and ethical reasoning affects the ethical decision-making of tax consultants. The results showed that tax consultants with a high perception of the importance of ethical and social responsibility and ethical reasoning and low perception of Machiavellianism support that tax consultants conduct ethical decision-making. Meanwhile, idealism, experience, and professional commitment do not affect tax consultants' ethical decision-making. The implications of this research are for tax consultants to maintain the perception of the importance of ethics and social responsibility, and ethical considerations to make ethical decisions. The limitation of this study is that it uses respondents' perceptions of questions related to all variables. This finding shows that there is still a subjective element of the respondents.