Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal Law and Legal Ethics (IJLLE) West Science Law and Human Rights
Aris Prio Agus Santoso
Duta Bangsa University Surakarta
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Juridical Analysis Of Elementary Performed By A Urological Doctor On The Request Of The Court Dwi Prayogo; Ahmad Rifai; Aris Prio Agus Santoso
International Journal of Law and Legal Ethics Vol 3 No 1 (2022): Vol 3 Issue 1 April 2022
Publisher : DUTA BANGSA UNIVERSITY INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Law No. 17/2016 has emphasized that perpetrators of sexual crimes can be castrated, but this is a polemic for medical personnel who are appointed as executor in this action, because eliminating the patient's normal body functions is very contrary to the duties of a doctor. This study aims to obtain answers to legal protection for urology doctors who perform castration and to find out whether the actions taken by urologists at the request of the court were against medical ethics or not. The approach method used in this research is a library research approach with secondary data collection. The results of further research were analyzed qualitatively. Based on the research that has been done, it can be concluded that the urologist who performs castration at the request of the court, means that the action is an order that must be carried out, but this is contrary to professional standards because castration can have a bad impact on the patient and this is very contrary to professional standards and doctor's code of ethics so that it can be concluded that legal protection cannot be provided because the doctor acts contrary to professional standards and doctor's code of ethics. Castration performed by a urologist is against the code of medical ethics even though it is an order from the court. On the other hand, the doctor does not have the authority to act as a direct executor, while the executor himself is actually a public prosecutor, so that the doctor can refuse the action if it is considered contrary to the code of ethics and conscience.
Protection Consumers Against Beauty Salons In Performing Invasive Actions Devi Fahwi Kurniastuti; Ratna Wulan Valentina; Risky Eka Pratama; Yessa Ayu Agista; Aris Prio Agus Santoso
West Science Law and Human Rights Vol. 2 No. 02 (2024): West Science Law and Human Rights
Publisher : Westscience Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58812/wslhr.v2i02.865

Abstract

The rapid development of the times not only creates a need related to clothing, food and shelter, but also creates other needs in the form of beauty needs. This is the reason many business actors have begun to switch to offering services in the beauty sector.  There is an overlap regarding the duties and authority of nurses who perform invasive actions in the practice of independent surgery.  This study utilizes a normative legal method as its research foundation in examining beauty salons in Indonesia. This method is known for its emphasis on analyzing written legal norms and related references concerning regulations on beauty and aesthetics. Actions taken by nurses without the supervision of a doctor can be considered a violation of the applicable law. Thus, it is important for the government and consumer organizations to continue to supervise and control beauty salon practices in order to ensure that the services provided comply with consumer health and safety standards. This supervision is also important to prevent unnecessary invasive actions that could potentially harm consumers.
Authority of Amicus Curiae in Constitutional proceedings : Bridging Society and the Constitutional Court Erlinda Putri Nurdiyanti; Fayza Galih Nur Rohmah; Mahageng Kusumaningtyas; Aris Prio Agus Santoso
West Science Law and Human Rights Vol. 2 No. 03 (2024): West Science Law and Human Rights
Publisher : Westscience Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58812/wslhr.v2i03.970

Abstract

Amicus Curiae, or friends of the court, is an important instrument in constitutional proceedings in Indonesia even though it does not yet have a standard legal basis. This study discusses the authority of Amicus Curiae in providing additional information, enriching the judge's consideration, and supervising the proceedings of the Constitutional Court. The method used is the literature study approach, which is a research method whose series of research is related to the method of collecting library data, or research whose object of research is studied through various literature information, such as: books, journals, articles and documents. Amicus Curiae is filed in the form of a written document containing legal arguments and other relevant analysis. The Constitutional Court has the authority to reject Amicus Curiae that are judged irrelevant or filed with improper motives. On the other hand, a quality Amicus Curiae can have a positive influence on the decisions of the Constitutional Court and contribute to law enforcement and democracy in Indonesia. Amicus Curiae has not been clearly regulated in Indonesia, but in principle it is accepted under article 5 paragraph 1 of the Law on Judicial Power "Judges and constitutional judges are obliged to explore, follow and understand the legal values and sense of justice that live in society. Furthermore, the confession of the Amicus Curiae can be found in article 180 paragraph 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure which states that "In the event that it is necessary to clear up the sitting of the matter arising in court, the presiding judge of the trial may request expert testimony and may also request to submit new material by the interested person.
Co-Authors Ahmad Rifai Devi Fahwi Kurniastuti Dwi Prayogo Erlinda Putri Nurdiyanti Fayza Galih Nur Rohmah Mahageng Kusumaningtyas Ratna Wulan Valentina Risky Eka Pratama Yessa Ayu Agista