Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Comparative Study: Use Of 0.9% Normal Saline Irrigation Liquid and 10% Povidone-Iodine in The Process of Laparatomy Sectio Caesarea Operation in Hospital Dedi Kurnia
Jurnal KESANS : Kesehatan dan Sains Vol 1 No 11 (2022): KESANS: International Journal of Health and Science
Publisher : Rifa'Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54543/kesans.v1i11.99

Abstract

Introduction: Operating Area Infections (IDO) is part of Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) which is a global problem and reaches at least 9% (3%-21%) of 1.4 million clients worldwide. This figure was reported by the World Health Organization (WHO) from the results of a survey in 14 countries covering 28,861 clients in 47 hospitals. Based on the results of a survey every year, millions of people undergo surgical treatment so that surgical intervention covers about 13% of the total life or DALYs (Disability-Adjusted Life Years). Objective: irrigation fluids normal saline 0.9% and povidone-iodine with the wound healing process after laparotomy sectio caesarea. Methods: The design used in this study is an expost facto comparative, namely research that compares the presence of one or more variables in different samples with a retrospective approach. Results and Discussion: The results of the research analysis showed that there were significant differences between the two irrigation fluids, but according to several theories and research, the differences were due to differences in composition and characteristics of the irrigation fluids that had been used. However, the irrigation fluid can still be used for intraoperative irrigation. Conclusion: This study shows that there is a statistical difference between the two types of irrigation fluids, namely normal saline 0.9% and povidone iodine on the wound healing process by having different characteristics and fluid composition
The Role of Supervision and Nurses’ Job Satisfaction in Implementing Patient Safety Goals Selvia Rahayu; Dedi Kurnia
HealthCare Nursing Journal Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): HealthCare Nursing Journal
Publisher : LP3M Universitas Muhammadiyah Tasikmalaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35568/healthcare.v8i1.7628

Abstract

The implementation of patient safety goals is essential to ensure safe nursing care and to prevent patient safety incidents. This study aimed to examine the relationship between nurses’ perceptions of supervision and job satisfaction and the implementation of patient safety goals at Hospital X in Bandung. A correlational analytic study with a cross-sectional design was conducted. Total sampling was applied, involving 89 staff nurses from all eligible units. Data were collected using a questionnaire distributed via Google Forms and analyzed using frequency distribution for univariate analysis and Kendall’s tau test for bivariate analysis. The results showed that 44.9% of respondents perceived supervision as good, 79.8% reported moderate job satisfaction, and 61.8% demonstrated good implementation of patient safety goals. There was a significant, moderately strong, and positive relationship between supervision and the implementation of patient safety goals (p=0.001; r=0.385). In contrast, job satisfaction showed a significant but weak negative relationship with the implementation of patient safety goals (p=0.037; r=−0.218). These findings indicate that supervision and nurses’ job satisfaction are associated with the implementation of patient safety goals. Therefore, hospital management should conduct regular evaluations of supervision, job satisfaction, and patient safety goal implementation and strengthen continuous engagement through safety talks or safety briefings.