Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

The Juridical Overview of the Sale of Owned Land on Joint Assets by Husband without Wife's Consent Ary Patria Wisnu; Nanang Sri Darmadi; Andi Aina Ilmih
Sultan Agung Notary Law Review Vol 4, No 2 (2022): June 2022
Publisher : Program Studi Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam SUltan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/sanlar.4.2.465-476

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to analyze: 1). The responsibility of the Land Deed Making Officer (PPAT) for the making of the Sale and Purchase Deed of the object of joint property transferred without the wife's approval based on Decision No. 253/Pdt.Plw/2018/PN.Skt. 2). The legal consequences of the sale of land ownership rights to joint property by the husband without the wife's consent based on Decision No. 253/Pdt.Plw/2018/PN.Skt. The approach method in this research is a normative juridical approach. The data used is secondary data obtained through literature study, data analysis was carried out by qualitative analysis. The results of the research concluded: 1). The responsibility of the Land Deed Making Officer (PPAT) for the making of the Sale and Purchase Deed of the object of joint property transferred without the wife's approval based on Decision No. 253/Pdt.Plw/2018/PN. Skt is an absolute responsibility caused because in making the sale and purchase deed the PPAT was not careful and careful. As a result of decision No. 253/Pdt.Plw/2018/PN.Skt is deed No. 112/ sale and purchase deed is contrary to the law, it will cause losses for the opposing party. PPAT must share responsibility for material losses suffered by the parties. 2). The legal consequences of the sale of land ownership rights to joint property by the husband without the wife's consent based on Decision No. 253/Pdt.Plw/2018/PN.Skt is invalid and null and void. As a result, the Plaintiffs suffered material losses. So that in terms of legal certainty theory, this sale and purchase cannot provide legal certainty for the Buyer, so that the Opponent II and PPAT must be responsible for the unlawful acts they have committed.
The Provision of Unsecured Micro Business Loans at Bank BKC Susukan Branch Office of Cirebon Regency Carki Carki; Jawade Hafidz; Nanang Sri Darmadi
Sultan Agung Notary Law Review Vol 4, No 3 (2022): September 2022
Publisher : Program Studi Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam SUltan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/sanlar.4.3.822-831

Abstract

Micro Business Credit is financing for Micro, Small, Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in the form of providing working capital supported by guarantee facilities for productive businesses. Bank BKC Susukan Branch of Cirebon Regency is a Regional Rural Bank in addition to conventional commercial banks such as BNI, BTN, Bank Mandiri, Bukopin, Mandiri Syariah Bank which is trusted by the government to distribute business loans. The phenomenon that occurs, through this Micro Business Credit, the borrower does not need to provide collateral to the bank because this credit is a loan without collateral and has been guaranteed by the government. This does not mean that if the program has been borne by the government, this program can run smoothly and in accordance with the desired expectations. Basically, this loan is one of the BANK BKC program for the Susukan Branch Office where the bank is the place for micro business credit to be distributed to the public, of course with the internal policies and requirements of the bank. Therefore, unsecured credit is facilitated by this bank because it is basically micro-enterprises that drive the economy of the area, therefore with the aim of helping the micro community, banks also benefit from good economic movements, so that bank activities in the bank's business will be good because with the existence of a given credit means that the bank earns a relatively high interest considering that the loan is given without any collateral. 
The Role and Responsibilities of a Notary in Making a Certificate of Inheritance for Disbursement of Time Deposit Savings Funds by the Heirs Ibnu Adi Prasetyo; Bambang Tri Bawono; Nanang Sri Darmadi
Sultan Agung Notary Law Review Vol 4, No 3 (2022): September 2022
Publisher : Program Studi Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam SUltan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/sanlar.4.3.895-906

Abstract

A notary is a public official who authorized to make an authentic deed. Notaries as public officials play an important role in the banking industry, especially in making authentic deeds, one of which is a certificate of inheritance made by a notary. The role and responsibilities of a notary in carrying out his position that a notary is obliged to carry out the provisions contained in the Law on Notary Positions. The approach method used in this research is sociological juridical, meaning that research is carried out on the real situation of the application of law to society with the intent and purpose of finding facts (fact-finding), which then leads to problem identification and then leads to problem solving. Based on research conducted by the author that the role and responsibility of a notary in making a certificate of inheritance rights, a notary in carrying out his position is obliged to follow the provisions contained in the notary position law. Obstacles faced by notaries in making certificates of inheritance rights include notaries not mastering and understanding the provisions related to certificates of heirs, notaries having difficulty determining whether the witnesses presented are appropriate or not, there is no unification regarding the implementation arrangements for making certificates of inheritance rights, there are witnesses or heirs who are dishonest in giving statements. To overcome these obstacles, namely the need for accuracy on the part of the Notary so that mistakes do not occur in the future.
The Responsibility of Werda Notary to Deals the Problems What Has Done Shinta Rahmatika Damayanti; Nanang Sri Darmadi
Sultan Agung Notary Law Review Vol 4, No 2 (2022): June 2022
Publisher : Program Studi Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam SUltan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/sanlar.4.2.357-367

Abstract

This study aims to find out and examine how long the Notary is responsible for the deed made after the end of his term of office, as well as to find out and examine how the forms of civil liability of the Notary are to the deeds made after the end of his term of office. This type of research uses normative juridical, which is an analytical perspective. The results showed that the form of notary accountability after a Werda Notary can be divided into 3 (three) including 1) Civil liability of the Notary to the material truth of the deed he has made, 2) Civil criminal liability of the Notary to the material truth of the deed he has made, 3) Notary's responsibility in carrying out the duties of the position are based on the notary code of ethics. Werda Notary who has violated the deed he made and caused harm to the parties may be subject to legal provisions both civil and/or criminal as long as the time limit has not been exceeded as stipulated in the Civil Code Article 1967 and the Criminal Code Article 78 jo 79, if the limit the time period has expired, then the parties can legally no longer file a lawsuit and/or claim the notary's office.