Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.452
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat Ushuluna: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin Paradigma: Junal Kalam dan Filsafat
Rizky Yazid
State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
Religion Humanities Social Sciences

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat

 1 
Persepsi Ibn Sīnā dan John Locke sebagai Pengetahuan Empiris Rizky Yazid
Refleksi Vol 21, No 1 (2022): Refleksi
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ref.v21i1.25093

Abstract

This paper focuses on the problem of the perception of Ibn Sīnā and John Locke as an activity of knowing which is an epistemological study in philosophy. Perception therefore, is a process and a certain way to gain knowledge. The problem with this research is that as a philosopher who affirms the important role of perception, he does not necessarily become an empiricist. Or the same concern does not have direct implications for the interest of empiricism. This study uses a comparative method as its approach which aims to obtain similarities and differences regarding the concepts of the two philosophers. The findings of this study are that Ibn Sīnā has instruments for empirical research but is not an adherent of empiricism. While John Locke has the same instrument, which empirical based but as an empiricist
Berkeley and Sensible Things Rizky Yazid
Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat Vol 23, No 1 (2024): Refleksi
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ref.v23i1.31856

Abstract

This paper aims to re-reading Berkeley and reposition his philosophy of knowledge between the claims of adherents of idealism or immaterialism that so far have been labeled by interpreters. In other words, the label as an adherent of idealism or immaterialism is not a position stated by Berkeley himself, but the result of interpreters reading the consequences of Berkeley's philosophy of knowledge. Those who called Berkeley an idealist included: Georges Dickers, Robert G. Meyers and Robert J. Fogelin. His assumption, citing Dickers, branded Berkeley as an idealist because of Berkeley's view that there are only ideas and thoughts rather than physical objects. Meanwhile, those who label Berkeley as adherents of immaterialism include: I.C. Tipton, David Berman. His assumption cites Berman that Berkeley's labeling of immaterialism is hypothetical and a consequence of his philosophical views. This study uses a descriptive method, where relevant texts are collected first as research objects, which the writer then describes as variables. The status variable itself has no influence or relationship or correlation with other variables. The findings of this study are that both interpreting Berkeley as immaterialist and idealist are related to Berkeley's rejection of religious skepticism. In addition, labeling as an immaterialist or idealist comes from the interpretation of Berkeley's schoolar on the consequences of Berkeley's rejection of physical objects that are independent of the subject's mind.
Persepsi Ibn Sīnā dan John Locke sebagai Pengetahuan Empiris Rizky Yazid
Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat Vol 21, No 1 (2022): Refleksi
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ref.v21i1.25093

Abstract

This paper focuses on the problem of the perception of Ibn Sīnā and John Locke as an activity of knowing which is an epistemological study in philosophy. Perception therefore, is a process and a certain way to gain knowledge. The problem with this research is that as a philosopher who affirms the important role of perception, he does not necessarily become an empiricist. Or the same concern does not have direct implications for the interest of empiricism. This study uses a comparative method as its approach which aims to obtain similarities and differences regarding the concepts of the two philosophers. The findings of this study are that Ibn Sīnā has instruments for empirical research but is not an adherent of empiricism. While John Locke has the same instrument, which empirical based but as an empiricist
Co-Authors Ganis Sholeha Muhammad Negara Tien Rohmatin, Tien