This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pijar MIPA
Denda Nadia Miranti
Physics Education Department, Faculty of Teacher and Training Education, University of Mataram

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

Students problem-solving skills ability on work and energy topics with different science process skills using a problem-based learning model Denda Nadia Miranti; Ahmad Harjono; Satutik Rahayu
Jurnal Pijar Mipa Vol. 17 No. 5 (2022): September 2022
Publisher : Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Mataram. Jurnal Pijar MIPA colaborates with Perkumpulan Pendidik IPA Indonesia Wilayah Nusa Tenggara Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jpm.v17i5.3171

Abstract

This study aims to: (1) determine the effect of the problem-based learning model on students' problem-solving abilities; (2) study the effect of science process skills on students' problem-solving abilities; (3) find the interaction between problem-based learning PBL models and science process skills on students' problem-solving abilities. The type of research is quasi-experimental research with Factorial Design 2 x 2. Population in research of all tenth-grade science students at senior high school SMA Negeri 1 Gunungsari in 2017/2018 academic years. Sampling in this study uses the cluster random sampling technique, in which the X MIA is an experiment class, and the X MIA 1 is a control class. The research instrument used was a description test taking into account the problem's validity, reliability, power difference, and level of difficulty and using observation sheets of science process skills. The data of this study were analyzed by two-way variance analysis with a 2 x 2 factorial design. Based on the result of the study, the average value of the post-test experimental class was 80.29, and the control class was 73.25. The normality and homogeneity tests showed that the two classes were normally distributed and homogeneous at a significant level of 0.05. Then proceed with hypothesis testing using a two-way ANOVA test. The result showed that: (1) FA>Ftable that is 29.35>4.02 means that there is an influence of the PBL model on students' problem-solving abilities; (2) FB>Ftable, namely 29.35 > 4.02 means that there is an influence of science process skills on students' problem-solving abilities; (3) FAB< Ftable, is 3.93<4.02 means that there is no interaction between PBL models and science process skills on students' problem-solving abilities.