Josua Navirio Pardede
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

REFLEKSI KRITIS TERHADAP KONSEP RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DALAM PERLINDUNGAN DAN PENGELOLAAN LINGKUNGAN HIDUP DI INDONESIA Josua Navirio Pardede; Wahyu Yun Santoso
Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia Vol 8 No 2 (2022): April
Publisher : Indonesian Center for Environmental Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38011/jhli.v8i2.390

Abstract

Keadilan restoratif telah menjadi isu arus utama dalam diskursus hukum pidana kontemporer di Indonesia. Beberapa instansi penegak hukum pun telah mengadopsi mekanisme keadilan restoratif dalam kebijakan institusionalnya. Bahkan, keadilan restoratif tertanam dalam Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional (RPJMN) 2020-2024. Diskursus keadilan restoratif juga berkembang dalam diskursus hukum lingkungan karena terdapat kesesuaian secara konsep dan bermanfaat bagi perlindungan lingkungan hidup. Oleh karena itu, artikel ini mengkaji keadilan restoratif sebagai konsep umum dalam kerangka hukum lingkungan di Indonesia. Kemudian, artikel ini mengidentifikasi permasalahan dan merefleksikannya secara kritis jika keadilan restoratif diterapkan pada penanganan perkara pidana lingkungan menggunakan metode yuridis normatif.
PROGRESSIVISM OF JUDGES IN DECIDING APPLICATIONS FOR MARRIAGE DISPENSATION Josua Navirio Pardede; Wigati Taberi Asih; Thogu Ahmad Siregar
Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal Vol. 6 No. 1 (2021): March
Publisher : Program magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32801/abc.v6i1.107

Abstract

Regulation on the age limit for a marriage through Act No. 16 of 2019 is based on the spirit of anti-discrimination and protection of children’s rights from the adverse effects of child marriage. However, the efforts to complicate and prevent child marriage has yet to have a significant impact on reducing the rate of child marriage in Indonesia. This condition is occurred by the high level of applications for marriage dispensation that are granted by the court. Hence, the construction of the judge’s reasoning in observe the relationship between the substance of the law and the reasons for proposing marriage dispensation is one of the most vital and influential elements. The positivism-legism legal reasoning used in understanding of Act No.16 of 2019 is considered to be the cause of the malfunction of the regulation in protecting and guaranteeing children’s human rights. By using doctrinal legal research methods, this research produces a conceptual analysis in the form of a meta-juridical critique on positivist legal reasoning which tends to lead to the legism when trying to understand the objectives of Act No. 16 of 2019 and proposes a progressive legal notion as an ideal reasoning framework in producing decisions on applications for dispensation of marriage that have a perspective on the protection and guarantee of children’s rights.