Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

INTEGRITAS DAN PROFESIONALITAS PENYELENGGARA PEMILU DEMI TERWUJUDNYA PEMILU YANG DEMOKRATIS Wilma Silalahi
Jurnal Bawaslu Provinsi Kepulauan Riau Vol 4 No 1 (2022): Etika Penyelenggara Pemilu
Publisher : Bawaslu Provinsi Kepulauan Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (844.074 KB) | DOI: 10.55108/jbk.v4i1.94

Abstract

Salah satu cara untuk memilih pemimpin adalah melalui pemilu yang dilaksanakan secara demokratis oleh lembaga penyelenggara pemilu guna memperoleh pemilu yang berkualitas.Pemerintahan yang demokratis dapat terwujud melalui peran serta dan partisipasi seluruh rakyat Indonesia.Oleh karena itu, dalam penyelenggaraan pemilu, sangat dibutuhkan kesiapan dari penyelenggara pemilu. Dengan demikian,yang menjadi permasalahan yang menarik pada tulisan ini adalah bagaimana integritas dan profesionalitas penyelenggara pemilu demi terwujudnya pemilu yang demokratis.Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif atau penelitian doktrinal, dengan metode analisis normatif.Pemilu yang demokratis harus dapat menciptakan suatu pemilu yang berkeadilan dan berkualitas. Salah satu indikator keberhasilan pemilu, tidak terlepas dari dukungan penyelenggara pemilu. Sehingga, sangat dibutuhkan integritas dan profesionalitas penyelenggara pemilu.Penyelenggaraan pemilu bertujuan demi terwujudnya pemilu yang demokratis. Oleh karena itu, penyelenggara pemilu dituntut mempunyai tanggung jawab dalam mewujudkan pemilu yang berkualitas dan meningkatkan integritas diri serta profesionalitas dalam melaksanakan tugas dan tanggung jawab yang diembannya.
KESIAPAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERSELISIHAN HASIL PEMILIHAN SERENTAK TAHUN 2024 Wilma Silalahi
Jurnal Bawaslu Provinsi Kepulauan Riau Vol 4 No 2 (2022): Jurnal Bawaslu Provinsi Kepulauan Riau
Publisher : Bawaslu Provinsi Kepulauan Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1066.149 KB) | DOI: 10.55108/jbk.v4i2.208

Abstract

Sebagai negara demokrasi, peran warga negara untuk ikut serta secara langsung memilih wakil-wakilnya, menunjukkan bahwa kedaulatan berada di tangan rakyat, yang dilaksanakan melalui pemilu. Dalam pelaksanaan Pemilihan, tidak terlepas dari terjadinya sengketa Pemilihan, baik pelanggaran pemilu, sengketa proses pemilu, maupun perselisihan hasil pemilu. Terhadap tulisan ini, metode yang digunakan adalah metode normatif analisis atau disebut juga penelitian doktrinal. Penyelesaian perselisihan hasil Pemilihan merupakan kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi untuk menyelesaikannya. Dalam penyelesaian sengketa perselisihan hasil Pemilihan serentak tahun 2024, Mahkamah Konstitusi telah mempersiapkan dengan baik, baik dari sisi regulasi, SDM, sarana dan prasarana, ICT, Bimbingan Teknis dan Workshop, kultur untuk menghasilkan suatu pemilu yang demokratis dan berintegritas, dengan tetap berlandaskan asas-asas pemilu yang demokratis, yakni pemilu yang diselenggarakan secara periodik berdasarkan prinsip langsung, umum, bebas, rahasia, jujur, dan adil. Sedangkan untuk menghasilkan pemilu berintegritas harus berdasarkan kepada prinsip jujur, transparan, akuntabel, dan akurat.
The Normative Vacuum in Notarial Criminal Liability for Negligence in Preparing Authentic Deeds Used in Money Laundering Crimes Brighitta Priscilla MSS; Wilma Silalahi
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 4 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i4.3362

Abstract

This study examines the limits of notarial criminal liability in the preparation of authentic deeds used in money laundering offences. The issue arises because notaries are authorized to draw up authentic deeds with strong evidentiary value, while such deeds may also be misused to conceal or disguise assets derived from criminal activities. This research applies normative legal research using statute and case approaches. The findings show that a notary cannot be held criminally liable merely because an authentic deed is later used in a money laundering scheme. Criminal liability may only arise when fault is proven, whether in the form of intent, knowledge, reasonable suspicion, or serious negligence. Court decisions indicate that judges tend to interpret negligence and “reasonably suspects” through an objective-professional standard. However, Indonesian positive law has not clearly distinguished administrative negligence, gross professional negligence, and criminal participation. This normative vacuum creates legal uncertainty and may lead to the criminalization of notaries who perform their duties in good faith.
Budget Efficiency Policy and the Violation of the Right to Educational Priority: A Case Study of  Instruksi Presiden Nomor 1 Tahun 2025 (Presidential Instruction Number 1 of 2025) Wilma Silalahi; Gesta Subysesa Maharwani Adeputri
Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): : May: Sapientia Diversalis: Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/xgbycy05

Abstract

The issuance of Instruksi Presiden Nomor 1 Tahun 2025 concerning budget efficiency in the implementation of the 2025 State Budget and Regional Budget has generated significant constitutional and administrative law debates in Indonesia. The policy mandates substantial expenditure reductions across ministries and government agencies, including the education sector, despite the constitutional requirement under Article 31 paragraph (4) of the Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 that education receive priority funding. Simultaneously, the government allocated substantial financial resources to the Free Nutritious Meals Program (Program Makan Bergizi Gratis), creating concerns regarding the consistency of fiscal priorities and the protection of constitutional rights. This study employs a normative legal research method using statute, conceptual, and case approaches. Primary legal materials consist of constitutional and statutory provisions, while secondary materials include scholarly literature and legal doctrines. The findings indicate that the implementation of budget efficiency measures through Instruksi Presiden Nomor 1 Tahun 2025 potentially conflicts with constitutional guarantees of educational rights and exceeds the permissible limits of executive discretion under administrative law principles. The study further emphasizes the need for stronger constitutional oversight and accountability mechanisms to ensure that fiscal policies remain consistent with constitutionally protected educational priorities.  
EVALUASI PENYELENGGARAAN PEMILU TERKAIT REGULASI PENCORETAN/PEMBENARAN HASIL PENGHITUNGAN SUARA Wilma Silalahi
Jurnal Bawaslu Provinsi Kepulauan Riau Vol 7 No 02 (2025): Jurnal Bawaslu Provinsi Kepulauan Riau Volume 07 Nomor 02 Bulan Desember 2025
Publisher : Bawaslu Provinsi Kepulauan Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The implementation of the 2024 simultaneous general elections has left a number of challenges for election management bodies. Various issues and disputes that arose during the electoral process serve as important notes for future election administration. However, problems and disputes are inseparable from the conduct of elections, thereby necessitating a comprehensive evaluation of election implementation. Therefore, the main issue examined in this study is the evaluation of election administration related to the regulation on the correction or amendment of vote-counting results. This paper does not aim to suggest that the administration of the 2024 elections was ineffective or suboptimal; rather, it seeks to examine another perspective on whether existing electoral regulations have adequately accommodated and provided legal certainty for all citizens of Indonesia, considering that elections constitute the largest democratic event conducted by the Indonesian nation. This study employs normative juridical legal research, which holds that the formation of laws and regulations must comply with the mandates of Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia as the highest legal authority within the Indonesian legal system, or what Wignjosoebroto refers to as doctrinal legal research. In the event of corrections or amendments to copy forms, such corrections are made by striking through numbers or words with two horizontal lines and writing the corrected numbers or words above the crossed-out text, accompanied by the initials of the Chairperson of the Polling Station Working Committee (KPPS) and the witnesses present. Meanwhile, corrections to the Model C.Hasil Plano form are carried out using correction fluid (tipp-ex) without initials, as the form will be photographed and subsequently uploaded to the Sirekap system. The evaluation of election administration, particularly regarding the correction or amendment of vote-counting results, requires broader dissemination and socialization of the relevant regulations. Furthermore, electoral regulations must be aligned with developments in the constitutional system and the needs of Indonesian society and the nation.
Konstruksi Hubungan Hukum dalam Kontrak Elektronik Ojek Online dan Perlindungan Konsumen Ferdinand Polopadang; Wilma Silalahi
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 9 No. 3 (2026): SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v9i3.14255

Abstract

This study analyzes the legal relationship construction in online motorcycle taxi electronic contracts and the conformity of liability limitation clauses with Consumer Protection Law. The research employs a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and analytical approaches. The findings reveal that electronic contracts in online transportation platforms formally fulfill the validity requirements of agreements under the Indonesian Civil Code and are recognized under the Electronic Information and Transactions Law. However, liability limitation clauses in standard contracts tend to transfer risks to consumers and driver-partners. Such clauses contradict Article 18 of the Consumer Protection Law because they limit business liability and reduce consumers’ rights to compensation. The study further finds that digital platforms cannot merely be regarded as intermediaries, as they exercise substantial control over transactions, pricing systems, payment mechanisms, and dispute resolution. The novelty of this research lies in its analysis of the tripartite legal relationship between platforms, driver-partners, and consumers through a function-based and control-based approach in attributing legal responsibility. The study emphasizes the importance of fair consumer protection within the digital ecosystem.     Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis konstruksi hubungan hukum dalam kontrak elektronik layanan ojek online serta kesesuaian klausula pembatasan tanggung jawab dengan Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen. Penelitian menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan analitis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kontrak elektronik pada platform ojek online secara formal memenuhi syarat sah perjanjian berdasarkan KUHPerdata dan diakui melalui UU ITE. Namun, praktik klausula pembatasan tanggung jawab dalam kontrak baku cenderung mengalihkan risiko kepada konsumen dan mitra pengemudi. Klausula tersebut bertentangan dengan Pasal 18 Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen karena membatasi tanggung jawab pelaku usaha dan mengurangi hak konsumen memperoleh ganti rugi. Penelitian ini juga menemukan bahwa platform digital tidak dapat diposisikan hanya sebagai perantara, karena memiliki kontrol nyata terhadap transaksi, penentuan tarif, pembayaran, dan penyelesaian sengketa. Kebaruan penelitian terletak pada analisis hubungan hukum tripartit antara platform, mitra pengemudi, dan konsumen dengan pendekatan berbasis fungsi dan tingkat kontrol dalam distribusi tanggung jawab hukum. Penelitian menegaskan pentingnya perlindungan konsumen yang berkeadilan dalam ekosistem digital.