Adi Inggit Handoko
Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Sriwijaya

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Sensitivitas Interkultural Antarumat Beragama di Kota Palembang Adi Inggit Handoko; Rindang Senja Andarini; Febrimarani Malinda
Jurnal ILMU KOMUNIKASI Vol. 19 No. 2 (2022)
Publisher : FISIP Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jik.v19i2, Desember.4011

Abstract

Religious differences often trigger conflict in a multicultural society. Palembang, with its diverse community characteristics, is claimed as zero conflict area. This study aims to see intercultural sensitivity among religious people in Palembang. This qualitative research uses a case study approach with the theory of the Developmental Model of Intercultural Sensitivity. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with religious leaders. The results shows that each religious group tries to emphasize ethnorelativism through tolerance, mutual cooperation in building houses of worship, friendship relations with different adherents. However, at some levels, ethnic prejudices and stereotypes against different religious people still emerge.
Tempo.Co's Framing Of Activist Arrests Following The August 2025 Demonstrations Adi Inggit Handoko; Aprila Anggun Cahyani; Pramana Pramana
Communication Vol 17, No 2 (2026): Communication
Publisher : Fakultas Komunikasi & Desain Kreatif - Universitas Budi Luhur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36080/comm.v17i2.4357

Abstract

This study examines how Tempo.co framed its coverage of the arrests of activists and members of civil society, including the confiscation of books as evidence, following the demonstrations in late August 2025. It employed a descriptive qualitative design and Robert N. Entman's framing analysis model, which comprises four principal elements: defining problems, diagnosing causes, making moral judgments, and suggesting remedies. The data consisted of twenty news articles published by Tempo.co between September and October 2025. The findings indicate that Tempo.co consistently defined the authorities' actions as problems involving procedural irregularities, the criminalization of literacy, and threats to civil liberties. Although the coverage appeared formally neutral, it was substantively critical, particularly through the predominant selection of legal scholars, human rights institutions, and civil society organizations as sources, all of whom repeatedly criticized the authorities. Tempo.co also constructed a discursive contrast between official police claims and expert assessments, directing readers to recognize an incongruity between law-enforcement practices and the principles of civil liberty. The findings demonstrate that Tempo.co framed the issue as a problematic practice that endangered democratic space.