Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PENDEKATAN SISTEM DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH PERKAWINAN POLIGAMI TANPA IZIN PENGADILAN Eman Sulaiman
Ash-Shahabah : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Studi Islam Vol. 5 No. 2 (2019): Ash-Shahabah: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Studi Islam
Publisher : Fakultas Agama Islam Universitas Islam Makassar (UIM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article outlines the system approach in solving the problem without court permission polygamous marriage with normative and sociological approaches. The results obtained by the understanding that the discussion of problem solving polygamous marriage without cour permission, not only handled / disconected by using anormative approach, but must be completed / decided by other considerations, such as solving / conflict with empirical and philosophical approach as a complete system, so that a decision completed / solved by law enforcement and justice (judge) promoting a sense of justice of the people / society. Mistake in making decisions, will lead to bad consequences in the lives of families / households and communities.
FUNGSI ADVOKAT DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SENGKETA DI LUAR PENGADILAN Eman Sulaiman
Ash-Shahabah : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Studi Islam Vol. 6 No. 1 (2020): Adh-Shahabah: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Studi Islam
Publisher : Fakultas Agama Islam Universitas Islam Makassar (UIM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article discusses the Function of Advocates in Resolving Disputes Outside the Court. From the results of the discussion, it can be understood that the function of advocates in the settlement of civil disputes through non-trial (non-adjudication) efforts is to defend interests or represent clients in real, to realize resolving disputes for which they are responsible without going through a process in court (adjudication). Advocates in carrying out good functions, it is necessary to increase formal education, especially for advocates who are still in the bachelor (S1), so that understanding of legal science is deeper, because the development of science, especially legal science is increasingly developing, so that if advocates do not take the initiative to develop their knowledge, it will be left behind because the experience of practice alone does not guarantee there is quality for an advocate. Practical experience is supported by higher formal education, so the quality of advocates is increasingly visible.