Herwastoeti
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

ANALISIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO.2871K/PDT/2017 DALAM KASUS PENGINGKARAN AKTA PERJANJIAN PERDAMAIAN NO.04/PDT.G/2000/PN.PROB Risma Puspita Ningrum; Sofyan Arief; Herwastoeti
Indonesia Law Reform Journal Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): Maret 2021
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (273.138 KB) | DOI: 10.22219/ilrej.v1i1.16126

Abstract

This study aims to determine the legal strength of the Peace Agreement Deed No.04/Pdt.G/2000/PN.Prob and to analyze the Supreme Court Decision N0.2871K/Pdt.G/PN.Prob in the case of denial of the peace agreement deed No.04/Pdt.G /2000/PN.Prob in a Legal Perspective, this research uses the Normative Juridical method. The result of this research is that Peace Decision No.04/Pdt.G/2000/PN.Prob has permanent legal force as well as the judge's decision at the final level. in accordance with the provisions of Article 1858 paragraph (1) of the Civil Code Jo. Article 130 paragraph (2) and (3) HIR, and the peace deed, have 3 legal powers, namely binding and final, perfect proof, and executorial power. The District Court's decision was appropriate because the defendant's actions were categorized as illegal actions based on Article 1365 of the Civil Code, this was because the plaintiffs were the legal owners of the disputed land based on the peace decision No.04/Pdt.G/2000/PN/Prob. The Court of Appeal's decision was inaccurate, because it had canceled the peace decision Deed No.4/Pdt.G/2000/PN.Prob in which the peace decision No.4/Pdt.G/2000/PN.Prob had permanent legal force as stipulated in Article 130 HIR, Jo. Article 1858 of the Civil Code, judges of the High Court in passing decisions exceed their authority because the High Court as Judex facti does not have the authority to judge or overturn the final decision, and if the Appellants find new evidence then the legal remedy that can be taken is legal. Article 67 letter b Law No.14 of 1985 concerning the Supreme Court. Furthermore, the Supreme Court's decision was appropriate, because according to the Supreme Court the Judex facti the High Court had wrongly applied the law because it had canceled the Peace Deed No.4/Pdt.G/2000.PN.Prob which had permanent legal force. So that in this case the legal conflict lies in the decision of the High Court
Analisis Praktik Jual Beli Tanah di Bawah Tangan yang Dilakukan di Hadapan Kepala Desa : (Studi Kasus di Desa Cangkering Kecamatan Amuntai Selatan Kabupaten Hulu Sungai Utara) Muhammad Amin; Herwastoeti; Muhammad Isrok
Indonesia Law Reform Journal Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021): Juli 2021
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (252.876 KB) | DOI: 10.22219/ilrej.v1i2.17396

Abstract

Sale and purchase of land rights regulated in PP no. 37 of 1998 concerning the Regulation of the Position of the Land Deed Making Official (PPAT) must be carried out in front of the authorized official. The PPAT's main duties and authorities are regulated in Article 2 paragraph (1), Article 3 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2). Cangkering Village is located in South Amuuntai District, North Hulu Sungai Regency. The people in this village carry out the practice of buying and selling land under their hands in front of the village head. The purpose of this study was to examine the factors behind the Cangkering Village community still doing buying and selling under the hands of which the practice was only poured in front of the Village Head. Second, how to resolve the problem if there is a dispute over the sale and purchase of private land. This type of research is a sociological juridical research using primary data and secondary data. The main activities that will be carried out in carrying out this research, namely field studies (Field Research) and literature studies (Library Research). The results of the study found that there are several factors that cause people to still do buying and selling under their hands. First, the factors of habit and culture. Second, the trust factor. Third, the fast process factor and low cost. Fourth, education factor and lack of socialization. When there is a dispute arising from the sale and purchase under the hands, the Cangkering Village Head will try to resolve it through mediation or through deliberation and peace between the two parties. Abstrak Jual beli hak atas tanah yang diatur dalam PP No. 37 Tahun 1998 tentang Peraturan Jabatan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) harus dilakukan dihadapan pejabat yang berwenang. Terkait tugas pokok dan kewenangan PPAT diatur di dalam Pasal 2 ayat (1), Pasal 3 ayat (1) dan ayat (2). Desa Cangkering berada di Kecamatan Amuuntai Selatan Kabupaten Hulu Sungai Utara. Masyarakat di desa ini melakukan praktik jual beli tanah bawah tangan di hadapan Kepala Desa. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah meneliti faktor-faktor yang melatarbelakangi masyarakat Desa Cangkering masih melakukan jual beli dibawah tangan yang prakteknya hanya dituangkan di hadapan Kepala Desa. Kedua, cara penyelesaian masalah jika terjadi sengketa terhadap jual beli tanah di bawah tangan. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian yuridis sosiologis dengan menggunakan data primer dan data sekunder. Kegiatan utama yang akan dilakukan dalam melaksanakan penelitian ini, yaitu studi lapangan (Field Research) dan studi kepustakaan (Library Research). Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa ada beberapa faktor yang menyebabkan masyarakat masih melakukan jual beli di bawah tangan. Pertama, faktor kebiasaan dan kebudayaan. Kedua, faktor kepercayaan. Ketiga, faktor proses cepat dan biaya ringan. Keempat, faktor pendidikan dan kurangnya sosialisasi. Ketika ada sengketa yang timbul akibat jual beli di bawah tangan tersebut, Kepala Desa Cangkering akan berupaya untuk menyelesaikan secara mediasi atau secara musyawarah dan perdamaian kedua belah pihak.