Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Mengkaji Indonesia Harmonization
Rifqi Hamdani
Universitas Indonesia
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Antara Etnosentrisme dan Demokrasi: Konflik Etnis Dayak-Madura Rifqi Hamdani
Jurnal Mengkaji Indonesia Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): December
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (133.031 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of this article is to discuss the issue of ethnocentrism and democracy in Indonesia with case studies in two regions. Firstly, ethnocentrism as the root and source of conflict between ethnic Dayak and Madurese in Sampit, Central Kalimantan Province. Purpose: This article aims to discuss the issue of ethnocentrism in the Dayak and Madurese conflict. Design/Methodology/Approach: The research method used is qualitative research. By using a descriptive approach and data collection techniques using literature study. Findings: The conflict between Dayak and Madurese was caused by the sentiments of the two ethnicities. Ethnic differences are used as sentiments to compete in various aspects of social, economic, and, politics. Ethnic differences and diversity that are expected to go hand in hand and complement each other with the democratic system in Indonesia still reap many problems. The democratic system seems to open space for the emergence of inter-ethnic conflicts. This is certainly a challenge for the Indonesian people. The government needs to always encourage and open space to conduct political socialization to all Indonesian people and community or ethnic groups, especially those related to the values of nationalism, tolerance, and Indonesian unity. Originality/Value: Many have discussed issues related to ethnocentrism, both Dayak and Madurese conflicts. But this research is more directed at the issue of ethnocentrism.
The Dynamics of Indonesian Presidential Threshold: A Legal Perspectives Rifqi Hamdani
Harmonization : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Ilmu Hukum, dan Ilmu Ekonomi Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Juni
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Indonesian government was the result of a combination of presidential and parliamentary systems. According to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, implementing a presidential system recognizes the President as an executive leader who is directly elected by the people. The election of the President and Vice President has an important role in government. To strengthen the presidential system, there steps were taken, such as setting thresholds in Article 222 of Law No. 7 of 2017 concerning public participation. This article described the requirements that must be met by political parties in nominating the President and Vice President based on Article 6A paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution. The minimum limit of votes that must be obtained by election participants to obtain certain rights in elections is called the threshold. The presidential threshold allows political parties to nominate candidates for President and Vice President as long as they come from political parties that won at least 20% of seats or 25% of valid votes nationally in previous legislative elections. This writing uses a normative juridical strategy and integrates conceptual methods by referring to laws, journals, books, and related research. The purpose of this writing is to identify regulations related to the Presidential Threshold in the context of organizing the vote for the President and Vice President based on Law No. 7 of 2017.
Co-Authors