Aris Septiono
Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Diponegoro. Jl. Imam Bardjo, S.H. No. 1 - Semarang 50241 Telp: (024)8310885 Dan 8313493; Fax (024) 8313516 Email: Magisterhukum_undip@yahoo.co.id

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

KEBIJAKAN HUKUM PIDANA DALAM PERLINDUNGAN HAK KEBEBASAN BERSERIKAT BAGI PEKERJA/BURUH INDONESIA Aris Septiono
LAW REFORM Vol 8, No 2 (2013)
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER ILMU HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO SEMARANG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (316.511 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/lr.v8i2.12422

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kebijakan hukum pidana dalam melindungi hak kebebasan berserikat bagi pekerja atau buruh di Indonesia. Metode Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normative. Penelitian ini juga akan menggunakan data komparatif undang-undang di Negara lain yang mengatur mengenai perlindungan hak kebebasan berserikat, sedangkan data Dianalisis secara kualitatif-normatif. Hasil penelitian ditemukan bahwa; Pertama,Kebijakan hukum pidana dalam perlindungan hak kebebasan berserikat bagi pekerja/buruh Indonesia adalah dengan menggunakan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP), Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2000 tentang Serikat Pekerja/serikat Buruh, Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan, Undang-Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 1998 tentang Kemerdekaan Menyampaikan Pendapat di Muka Umum. Kedua,Kebijakan aplikasi hukum pidana saat ini dalam perlindungan hak kebebasan berserikat bagi pekerja/buruh Indonesia dalam kaitan dengan Hak Asasi Manusia untuk penyidikan dalam penegakan hukum selain kepolisian juga diberikan wewenang kepada Pejabat Pegawai Negeri Sipil (PPNS) yang bertugas pada instansi yang bertanggungjawab di bidang ketenagakerjaan. Ketiga,Kebijakan formulasi hukum pidana dalam perlindungan hak kebebasan berserikat bagi pekerja/buruh Indonesia dalam kaitan dengan Hak Asasi Manusia yang akan datang, hanya terdapat pada konsep KUHP 2012.Kata Kunci: Pidana, Kebebasan Berserikat, Buruh/Pekerja.
REFORMULATION OF THE INSTITUTIONAL FUNCTIONS AND AUTHORITIES OF THE NATIONAL COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Aris Septiono
Journal Philosophy of Law Vol 4, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/jpl.v3i7.4212

Abstract

The handling of serious human rights violations has become a strategic and prioritized issue for the National Commission on Human Rights (Komnas HAM). This conceptual article aims to evaluate law enforcement efforts regarding cases of serious human rights violations handled by Komnas HAM and identify the obstacles and challenges faced in the process of resolving these cases. The research findings indicate that Komnas HAM has completed investigations into 12 cases of serious human rights violations and forwarded them to the Attorney General's Office as the investigator and public prosecutor. However, the legal process for these cases has stagnated, especially those already decided by the Ad Hoc Human Rights Court, such as the cases of Timor Timur, Tanjung Priok, and Abepura, where the defendants were eventually acquitted. The main challenges faced are the limited willingness and capacity of the Indonesian State to resolve cases of serious human rights violations. Additionally, weaknesses in legal aspects and the political will of the Government and Law Enforcement Agencies also influence the law enforcement process concerning serious human rights violations. Therefore, the novelty offered lies in the importance of a comprehensive evaluation of respect, protection, and fulfillment of human rights as a critical step to enhance the effectiveness of law enforcement regarding serious human rights violations. A reassessment of strengthening Komnas HAM's authority is required to ensure legally binding measures and clear consequences for those who do not comply with Komnas HAM's recommendations.
Tafsir Sosial Perbedaan Gaya Hidup Remaja Muhammadiyah dan NU di Kota Semarang Nugraha, Saka Mahardika Oktav Nugraha; Saka Mahardika Oktav Nugraha; Arum Ambarsari; Aris Septiono; Supriyanto
Muqoddima: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Riset Sosiologi Vol 6 No 1 (2025): Muqoddima: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Riset Sosiologi
Publisher : Laboratorium Sosiologi, Program Studi Sosiologi, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial, Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Indonesia (UNUSIA) Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47776/MJPRS.006.01.03

Abstract

Semarang City is where the pluralist Islamic teachings of two leading religious organizations in Indonesia, Muhammadiyah and Nahdlatul Ulama (NU), grow with their ideologies. What are the differences in interpreting social behaviour and the lifestyle of Muhammadiyah and NU youth in Semarang? The study used a qualitative phenomenological approach. According to Husserl (Creswell, 2009), phenomenological researchers reveal the basic meaning of invariant experiences and pressure on the intensity of consciousness. The study results show that the social interpretation of Muhammadiyah and NU youth regarding differences in social behaviour is correct and becomes a reference in everyday life. Differences in understanding of Fiqh between Muhammadiyah and NU youth are not obstacles to uniting society. NU youth can clash with NU youth, and Muhammadiyah youth can clash with Muhammadiyah youth because of differences in lifestyle.