Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kanz Philosophia: A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism MANDARINABLE: Journal of Chinese Studies
Refan Aditya
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Diri yang Pra-Deskriptif: (Studi Paralelisme Struktur Fundamental Manusia Dalam Filsafat Heidegger dan Mullā Şadrā) Refan Aditya
Kanz Philosophia: A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): June
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Sadra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20871/kpjipm.v7i1.97

Abstract

This study discusses the thoughts of two great philosophers namely Martin Heidegger and Mulla Ṣadrā in a study of Philosophy of Man in the topic of ‘Fundamental Structure of Man’. The problem discussed here is parallelism of the philosophers' ideas on the Fundamental Structure of Man. This study tries to figure out the nature of humans according to the philosophy of Martin Heidegger and Mullā Ṣadrā, and synthesizes them with the method of parallelism. The author feels that this research is important, not only to enrich the inter-philosophical dialogue, but also because these two philosophers share the same ontological principle in their philosophical foundation namely, Being. This view is called ontological reduction. Both were convinced that no philosophical problem could be solved unless the question of Being was adequately answered. The method used in this study is the particular comparative method, namely parallelism. From this research the author found that, Parallelism of the Fundamental Structure of Man according to Heidegger and Mulla Ṣadrā shows a criticism of the views that have taken root in the discourse of modern Western philosophy which was pioneered by Rene Descartes. Heidegger clearly shows his disagreement with the view of self in Cartesian philosophy and breaks it down with the idea of human Dasein as an existent who understands himself in a pre-structured understanding, existentially and precedes any reflection or any cognitive activity about I (self). Likewise Mullā Ṣadrā, who lived in the same century as Rene Descartes, indirectly criticized such philosophical traditions of rationalism by developing the idea of his ‘ilm hudhūrī, that this knowledge of I or self (self-knowledge) is immanent in itself (self-evident) and precede any form of conception or reflection about self and be the basis for every form of empirical knowledge.
Feng Shui and Theory of Place: Navigating Chinese Traditional Cosmology in Modern Ecology Refan Aditya
Mandarinable: Journal of Chinese Studies Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): MANDARINABLE: Journal of Chinese Studies
Publisher : Published by Confucius Institute UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/mandarinable.v4i1.2162

Abstract

This article is a theoretical review on Feng Shui in ecological discourse. Even though Feng Shui has always been about environmentalism, nature, and the harmonisation of humans with their environment, discussions of Feng Shui in the context of modern ecological science are relatively rare, or at least less popular. This is because Feng Shui, in modern and urban society, is treated more as pragmatic measures than ecological knowledge. This research aims to provide theoretical insights that engage Feng Shui in the discourse of ecology and modernity by grounding it in the theory of place put forward by Brian G. Cambel. The theory of place postulated that place holds a particular meaning for ethical commitment for human-nature living. There are three approaches to place: phenomenology, bioregionalism, and cultural geography. This research argues that these three approaches provide a paradigmatic grounding for the critical relevance of Feng Shui in modern ecology discourse, regardless of its non-scientific and superstitious reputation.
Co-Authors