p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Unram Law Review
Arsin Lukman
University of Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Peran dan Tanggung Jawab Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta Perkawinan Campuran Tifonia Tionusa; Arsin Lukman
Unram Law Review Vol 7 No 1 (2023): Unram Law Review(ULREV)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ulrev.v7i1.256

Abstract

Globalization have push marriage to be perform not only between Indonesian citizens but also may be done with foreigners. As it is known, through marriage could pooling the assets between the spouses which leads to the matter of ownership in the property whereas Indonesians cannot own land and buildings in Indonesia. Therefore, notary has a role in making authentic deed under the form of mixed marriage or also known as mixed marriage agreement. The purpose of this study is to examine and analyze the roles and responsibilities of a notary in making mixed marriage deeds. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory approach, presenting cases in the form of decisions, and analysis. The results shows that there are problems related to the making of a mixed marriage deed made by a notary. These problems are in the form of a notary who does not provide legal counseling on the deed that the clients want to make (Indonesian citizens and citizens of a foreign country), does not translate or explain the deed if it appeared not understandable, and does not write it down at the end of the deed that a translation or explanation has been carried out because the present does not understand the language used written in the deed. In addition, with these problems, the strength of proof and the legal consequences of the act made by the notary are affected. Therefore, notaries in carrying out their positions must be guided by Notary Department Law.    
Tanggungjawab dan Akibat Hukum bagi Notaris yang Membuat Perjanjian Pinjam Nama (Nominee) santi; Arsin Lukman
Unram Law Review Vol 7 No 1 (2023): Unram Law Review(ULREV)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ulrev.v7i1.257

Abstract

Ownership of land rights in Indonesia could solely owned by Indonesian citizens or legal entities which determined by the Indonesian Government. Based on the practice, there are lots of legal smuggling in the making of a nominee agreement by a Notary. The nominee agreement is a name-borrowing agreement, which commonly consist of the foreign citizens measures in borrowing the names of Indonesian citizens to conduct sale and purchase transactions for proprietary land. Through the nominee agreement, it is stipulated that the status of the land in the land book and certificate of property rights is registered in the name of an Indonesian citizen, yet the ownership or control remains with a foreign citizen. This study aims to examine the validity of the nominee agreement as a form of foreign ownership at once to find out the form of responsibilities and legal consequences for the concerned Notary whose composed the nominee agreement. This research refers to the Decision Number 45/Pdt.G/2020/PNTpg. It uses normative legal research methods, and the type of approach to case legislation is in the form of decisions. Based on the results of this study, it is shows that there are lots of legal smuggling in the making of a nominee agreement by a Notary. The nominee agreement has indirectly violated the provisions of Article 26 Paragraph (2) of Law Number 5 of 1960, since there has been a transfer of ownership in the form of property rights to foreign citizens, and as confirmed on Article 21 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 5 of 1960, only Indonesian citizens have the right to own property rights. As known, foreign citizen may only have usufructuary rights and rental rights. Therefore, the nominee agreement has no legal force at all.