Jujun Dwi Astuti
Poltekkes Kemenkes Jakarta III

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

SMART ABDOMEN MODEL AS CLINICAL LEARNING MEDIA IN IMPROVING MIDWIFERY STUDENT COMPETENCE IN POSTPARTUM CARE Herlyssa; Elly Dwi Wahyuni; Jujun Dwi Astuti; Sri Rahayu
SEAJOM: The Southeast Asia Journal of Midwifery Vol 8 No 2 (2022): SEAJOM: The Southeast Asia Journal of Midwifery
Publisher : AIPKIND (Asosiasi Pendidikan Kebidanan Indonesia)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36749/seajom.v8i2.181

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effectiveness of the "SMART" abdominal model as a clinical learning media in increasing student competence for assessing uterine fundal height in postpartum mothers. This research is a quasi-experimental research with The Posttest-only Control Group Design. The study was conducted in two groups, namely the treatment group and the control group. The population of this study was all students of the third semester of midwifery D III study program in two health polytechnic in Indonesia. The intervention group consisted of some students who were given assistance in using the "SMART" abdominal model to assess the height of the uterine fundus in postpartum mothers in simulated patients, while the control group consisted of some students without assistance in using the "SMART" abdominal model to assess height uterine fundus in postpartum women on a conventional abdominal model (Zoe's abdominal model). The total sample was 120 people, which were divided into 60 people from one Poltekkes as the control group and 60 people from another Poltekkes as the intervention group. The sampling technique was purposive sampling. Data was collected through questionnaires, and observation. The type of data in this study is primary data. Data analysis uses Kai Square. The SMART abdominal model supports the achievement of learning competencies by 81.4%. There was no significant difference in competence when students used the SMART abdominal model on simulated patients or paired them with Zoe's abdominal model. For this reason, innovation and creativity of lecturers are needed in supporting the achievement of subject learning through the development of learning models and technology. In supporting the wider use of the model as a form of downstreaming research products that are integrated into the dharma of education, it is necessary to socialize and disseminate the SMART abdominal model and promote efforts through collaboration with industry and MSMEs.
DIFFERENCES IN RESULTS OF LEARNING EVALUATION OF DELIVERY CARE USING OSCE AND NON-OSCE Een Nuraenah; Jujun Dwi Astuti; Syarifah
SEAJOM: The Southeast Asia Journal of Midwifery Vol 9 No 1 (2023): The Southeast Asian Journal of Midwifery
Publisher : AIPKIND (Asosiasi Pendidikan Kebidanan Indonesia)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36749/seajom.v9i1.196

Abstract

The midwifery Diploma 3 education curriculum includes theoretical learning as wellas clinical skills that must be possessed to carry out proper midwifery practice.Learning evaluation should cover all areas including clinical skills. Delivery care isone of the main competencies that must be ensured by midwifery students. PoltekkesJakarta 3 Midwifery Department D3 Midwifery Study Program conducts evaluationsusing various methods. Clinical skills evaluation methods can be through OSCE ornon-OSCE.The purpose of this study was to find out the differences in the results of theevaluation of clinical skills in delivery care by comparing the OSCE and non-OSCEmethods.This research method uses descriptive analytic. The population in this study wereLevel II students of the D3 Midwifery study program, totaling 80 students. The resultsof this study indicate that the clinical skill passing rate of students using the OSCEmethod is 97.5% higher than that of the non-OSCE method, which is 95%. The groupof students who used the OSCE evaluation method with a mean of 3.40 and the classwith the non-OSCE evaluation method was 3.13. Based on the results of theIndependent T Test Samples statistical test, the results obtained a significance of0.001 (P value <0.005). These results indicate a significant difference between theevaluation results of the OSCE method and the non-OSCE method on the clinicalskills of midwifery students in Midwifery Care for Maternity. The results of this studyare in accordance with several other research results which recommend the OSCEmethod to be one of the evaluation methods in midwifery Diploma 3 education.