Heriyah Oktaviani
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Tarbiyah Kota Pagaralam

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

The Effect of Using Mindmaple Applications to Improve Student Learning Outcomes in Islamic Studies Subjects at SMP Negeri 1 Palembang Ujang Sugara; Heriyah Oktaviani; Rusti Udaina; Mut Yati Mut Yati
Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling (JPDK) Vol. 4 No. 6 (2022): Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/jpdk.v4i6.8385

Abstract

Experimental research was conducted at SMP Negeri 1 Palembang. to determine the level of student learning outcomes in the experimental class and control class before and after the use of Mind Map media with the help of the MindMaple application in learning Islamic Religious Education. The data analysis technique used is the Independent-Sample t test and the Mann-Whitney test with the Statistical Product and Service Solution (SPSS) program. The experimental results that the researchers conducted showed the following results: First, based on the experimental results that have been described in the previous chapter and the data analysis that has been presented, it can be interpreted as follows. In the post-test cognitive learning outcomes of the experimental class and control class students obtained a count = ,544 (Appendix 9.4). While the value of t table for = 0.05 with df 55 obtained t (½, 55) = 2.304, meaning tcount < ttable (.544 < 2.304), thus H0 is accepted. So, it can be interpreted that there is no significant difference between the post-test cognitive learning outcomes of students in the experimental class and the control class. Meanwhile, the difference in the average post-test score for students' cognitive learning outcomes in the experimental class and the control class is 0.948. In the post-test affective learning outcomes of the experimental class and control class students obtained t count = 3.254 (Appendix 9.8). While the value of ttable for = 0.05 with df 55 obtained t (½, 55) = 2.304, meaning tcount > ttable (3.254 > 2.304), thus H0 is rejected. So, it can be interpreted that there is a significant difference between post-test affective learning outcomes of experimental class and control class students. While the difference in the average value of post-test effective learning outcomes for students in the experimental class and the control class is 5.13. In the post-test psychomotor learning outcomes of experimental class and control class students, the probability is below 0.05 (0.089 > 0.05), thus H0 is accepted. So, it can be interpreted that there is no significant difference between the post-test psychomotor learning outcomes of students in the experimental class and the control class. While the difference in the average post-test score for psychomotor learning outcomes for students in the experimental class and the control class is 3.24.