Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal LEGAL BRIEF Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Collegium Studiosum Journal
Andi Tenri Famauri
Universitas Hasanuddin
Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Legal Review of Land Ownership Disputes in the Construction of the Nipa-Nipa Reservoir Nurul Inayah Yusuf; Andi Suriyaman M. Pide; Andi Tenri Famauri
LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 11 No. 5 (2022): Desember: Law Science and Field
Publisher : IHSA Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35335/legal.v11i5.636

Abstract

This study aims to find out and analyze the causes of overlapping of some of the land owned by PT HK with the heirs and to know and analyze the legal protection of the heirs against the payment of compensation for land whose ownership is still disputed. This research uses the type of empirical legal research, in the form of legal research that functions to see the law in a real sense and examines how the law works in society. The results of this study indicate that the overlapping of some of the land owned by PT HK with the heirs is caused by a number of things, including the non-applicability of the Delimitation Contradictory principle when measuring the object of the dispute, then when a sale and purchase occurs, neither the MS nor PT HK heirs ever down to the location of the object of dispute but only buying and selling of documents related to the location of the object of dispute, and that there is no physical control by PT HK of the object of dispute and proof of ownership shown by both RM heirs and MS heirs is proof of rights long term and legal protection for recipients of compensation is an important matter in land acquisition for development in the public interest because compensation that is fair and in accordance with the rules for land acquisition for development in the public interest which has been well regulated and is clear is a benchmark regarding the level of success of the process. procurement of land for the ban use for public interest. Compensation must be given to the rightful party, in the event that the land object is in a case of ownership, compensation must be deposited at the local court (consignment) and can only be given after a court decision with permanent legal force or a deed of reconciliation.
PENGGUNAAN ASAS AUDI ET ALTERAM PARTEM DALAM PROSES PERSIDANGAN GUGATAN SEDERHANA DI PENGADILAN NEGERI Muh. Caesar Fachreza Harla; Andi Tenri Famauri; Andi Syahwiah A. Sapiddin
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol 6 No 1 (2023): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v6i1.828

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the application of the principle of audi et alteram partem in the proceedings of simple claims in the District Court and to examine the constraints and obstacles in applying the principle of audi et alteram partem in the proceedings of simple claims in the District Court. The research method used in this study is empirical research, which involves collecting data directly through field studies conducted at the District Court of Makassar and the District Court of Sungguminasa. Data collection techniques include interviews and literature review, followed by qualitative analysis and descriptive presentation. The results of this study indicate that: 1) The principle of audi et alteram partem applies to the proceedings of simple claims. Although the proceedings of simple claims are specifically regulated in the Supreme Court Regulation No. 2 of 2015 concerning Simple Justice in the General Judiciary, this principle must still be upheld. In the proceedings of simple claims, both the plaintiff and the defendant have the opportunity to express their opinions before the judge makes a decision. Parties who are absent in the first hearing will be summoned again to attend the second hearing in order to listen to arguments from the other party. 2) The constraints in applying the principle of audi et alteram partem include time limitations in the proceedings of simple claims, which may not provide sufficient time for the parties involved to present their arguments comprehensively and clearly, lack of legal support, making it difficult for them to effectively present their arguments, and lack of strong evidence, making it difficult for the judge to make accurate decisions.
Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Pernyataan Kepailitan Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN) Muhammad Akram; Sabir Alwy; Andi Tenri Famauri
Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Vol 4 No 2 (2020): Desember 2020
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PGRI YOGYAKARTA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31316/jk.v6i4.4348

Abstract

Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis permohonan pernyataan pailit terhadap BUMN dan Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap BUMN yang dinyatakan pailit. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif. Bahan hukum yang di peroleh kemudian disusun secara sistematis selanjutnya dianalisis secara kualitatif untuk mencapai kejelasan masalah yang akan diteliti. Hasil penelitian yang diperoleh menunjukkan bahwa Pasal 2 ayat (5) UUK-PKPU mengharuskan permohonan pernyataan pailit hanya dapat diajukan oleh Menteri Keuangan. Terlebih lagi dalam Putusan MK Nomor 48/PUU-XI/2013 dan Putusan MK Nomor 62/PUU-XI/2013 menyatakan bahwa status kekayaan BUMN merupakan Kekayaan Negara. Berdasarkan kedua Putusan MK tersebut juga dapat menjawab terkait dengan banyaknya interpretasi dari Pasal 2 ayat (5) tersebut. Kemudian Pertimbangan Hakim dalam memutuskan kepailitan terkait dengan PT. Kertas Leces (Persero) sudah berdasarkan ketentuan Pasal 291 UUK-PKPU dan dalam pembuktiannya di persidangan, terbukti lalai dalam memenuhi isi dari perdamaian, mengakibatkan PT. Kertas Leces (Persero) dinyatakan pailit. Terhadap pertimbangan hakim dalam upaya hukum peninjuan kembali yang dilakukan tersebut sudah tepat sesuai ketentuan Pasal 293 UUK-PKPU yang bahwa terkait pembatalan perdamaian tidak terbuka upaya hukum. Kata kunci: Hukum Kepailitan, Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN), Kepailitan BUMN, Kekayaan BUMN Abstract This study aims to find out and analyze the request for bankruptcy statements of SOEs and judges' considerations of SOEs declared bankrupt. By using normative legal research methods. The legal material obtained is then arranged systematically and then analyzed qualitatively to achieve the clarity of the problem to be examined. The results of the study showed that Article 2 paragraph (5) of the UUK-PKPU required the request for bankruptcy statements to only be submitted by the Minister of Finance. Moreover, in the Constitutional Court's decision Number 48/PUU-XI/2013 and MK Decision Number 62/PUU-XI/2013 states that the status of BUMN wealth is a state wealth. Based on the two Constitutional Court decisions, they can also answer related to the number of interpretations of Article 2 paragraph (5). Then the judge's consideration in deciding bankruptcy related to PT. Paper leces (Persero) is based on the provisions of Article 291 of the UUK-PKPU and in its proof at the trial, proven to be negligent in meeting the contents of peace, resulting in PT. Paper leces (Persero) is declared bankrupt. Regarding the judge's consideration in the legal remedies carried out the exactly carried out in accordance with the provisions of Article 293 of the UUK-PKPU which related to the cancellation of peace is not open to legal efforts. Keywords: Bankruptcy Law, State -Owned Enterprises (BUMN), BUMN Bankruptcy, BUMN Wealth
Co-Authors Andi Suriyaman M. Pide Andi Syahwiah A. Sapiddin Muh. Caesar Fachreza Harla Muhammad Akram Nurul Inayah Yusuf Sabir Alwy