Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum
Lastuti Abubakar
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia
Arts Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Kedudukan Beneficial Owner Dalam Korporasi Ditinjau Dari Aspek Perjanjian Dan Hukum Perseroan Terbatas Nabila Meiwindita; Lastuti Abubakar; Ema Rahmawati
Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022): Volume 6, Nomor 2, Desember 2022
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Perseroan Terbatas sebagai pelaku usaha menjadi salah satu sarana untuk mewujudkan pembangunan ekonomi. Sebagai Artificial Person, Perseroan Terbatas melakukan aktivitasnya melalui organ Perseroan Terbatas sebagaimana diamanatkan Pasal 1 angka 2 Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas. Pada perkembangannya, hadirnya Beneficial Ownership dalam pranata Perseroan Terbatas di Indonesia dimana organ tersebut memiliki wewenang mengendalikan Perseroan Terbatas termasuk menerima manfaat Perseroan Terbatas melebihi organ Perseroan Terbatas. Peneliti bermaksud untuk mengkaji kedudukan Beneficial Owner dalam korporasi ditinjau dari aspek perjanjian dan hukum Perseroan Terbatas, khususnya perikatan dasar yang menjadi sumber hubungan hukumnya berdasarkan Pasal 1233 KUHPerdata. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa sumber perikatan Beneficial Ownership dalam praktik Perseroan Terbatas adalah perjanjian nominee, dilihat dari para pihak yang terlibat, formalitas perjanjian, serta strukturnya. Adapun secara regulasi, Perpres No. 13/2018 sementara ini masih menjadi satu-satunya payung hukum Beneficial Ownership di Indonesia dimana dalam regulasi tersebut lebih condong terhadap penegakan hukum pidana korporasi. Sejauh ini belum ditemukan peraturan yang mengatur mengenai eksistensi Beneficial Owner dalam rezim hukum Perseroan Terbatas di Indonesia.
Peran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan dalam Pembentukan Pedoman Teknis Pembiayaan Berbasis Kekayaan Intelektual bagi Bank Muhammad Daniel Auliaulloh; Lastuti Abubakar; Tri Handayani
Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 5 No. 3 (2024): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/juinhum.5.3.10749.1207-1215

Abstract

The government presents an intellectual property-based financing mechanism through the regulation of Government Regulation Number 24 of 2022 concerning the Creative Economy. The regulation comes as a form of government support for creative economy players to advance the creative economy sector so that it can drive the national economy. The provision opens opportunities for creative economy players to obtain funding in order to build a business from government funds or bank and non-bank financial institutions. In accepting intellectual property as collateral, banks need to fulfill the obligation to conduct business verification, verification of intellectual property certificates, and assessment of intellectual property to be used as collateral. These obligations need to be regulated in a provision of technical guidelines for accepting intellectual property as financing collateral. The development of the technical guidelines needs to be done immediately considering that the regulation is a form of the implementation of the bank's prudential principle as the main principle of the banking sector. The position of the technical guidelines for financing based on intellectual property as financing collateral is to ensure the certainty of the bank in carrying out the financing. The problem arises when banks do not have the authority to make the technical guidelines themselves. Thus, the role of the Financial Services Authority as the banking sector regulator is required. The Financial Services Authority needs to exercise its authority as a regulator in preparing technical guidelines for intellectual property-based financing as an implementing regulation for banks. However, to be able to first create certainty for banks in accepting intellectual property as collateral, OJK can include intellectual property as collateral that can be calculated as a deduction in the calculation of PPKA by amending the Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 40/POJK.03/2019 concerning Asset Quality Assessment of Commercial Banks.
Co-Authors Ema Rahmawati Muhammad Daniel Auliaulloh Nabila Meiwindita Tri Handayani