Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Masalah-Masalah Hukum Padjadjaran Law Research and Debate Society Mimbar Hukum
Angga Priancha
Universitas Indonesia
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
RETHINKING “ELECTRONIC AGENT” TERMINOLOGY IN THE LAW ON ELECTRONIC INFORMATION AND TRANSACTION FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF INDONESIAN LASTGEVING LAW Angga Priancha; Ardia Khairunnisa; Tasya Caroline; Gilang Sephia
Mimbar Hukum Vol 34 No 2 (2022): Mimbar Hukum
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (369.463 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/mh.v34i2.3864

Abstract

Abstract The definition of “Electronic Agent” in Law of Electronic Information and Transaction (ITE Law) raised questions from the perspective of Agency Law (in Indonesia known as lastgeving). ITE Law construct that “Electronic Agent” is “a device of an electronic system that is made to do an action on a certain Electronic information automatically which is organized by person.” This construction of saying “Electronic Agent” as a device can be criticized through the perspective of agency law which agent usually refers to legal subject. The doctrine of agent in Indonesia is known as “as an act of giving a power of attorney” or “lastgeving.” Lastgeving is defined as a legal relationship between two legal subjects, where one subject gives his authority to another legal subject to do a certain action on behalf of the principal. This means, in concept, agent is a legal subject (legal entity) and not a legal object (object/device) which is constructed by ITE Law. This article will discuss how the adequacy of “Electronic Agent” terminology is used in the ITE Law from the perspective of Indonesia Lastgeving law. In discussing the issues stated above, this article uses the normative legal studies methodology. Abstrak Definisi “Agen Elektronik” dalam Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (UU Elektronik) menimbulkan pertanyaan dari sudut pandang Hukum Keagenan (di Indonesia dikenal sebagai Lastgeving). UU ITE mengkonstruksikan pemahaman “Agen Elektronik” sebagai sebuah “perangkat dari suatu Sistem Elektronik yang dibuat untuk melakukan suatu tindakan terhadap suatu Informasi Elektronik tertentu secara otomatis yang diselenggarakan oleh Orang.” Pengkonstruksian Agen Elektronik sebagai sebuah perangkat ini dapat dikritisi menyimpang dari konsep keagenan pada umumnya yang mengacu sebagai sebuah subjek hukum. Konsep agen atau di Indonesia secara doktrin dikenal sebagai “hukum pemberian kuasa” atau “lastgeving.” Lastgeving didefinisikan sebagai hubungan hukum antara dua orang, dimana sang agen diberikan kepercayaan untuk melakukan suatu hal atas nama sang principal. Yang berarti, agen adalah sebuah subjek hukum (orang) dan bukan objek hukum (barang/perangkat) seperti yang dikonstruksikan oleh UU ITE. Artikel ini akan membahas bagaimana ketepatan penggunaan terminologi “agen elektronik” didalam UU ITE melalui perspektif hukum pemberian kuasa atau lastgeving Indonesia. Dalam mambahas isu tersebut, artikel ini akan menggunakan metode yuridis normatif.
Stabilizing Unequal Positions in Copyright Licensing Agreements in Book Publishing: Comparison of Approach between the European Union and Indonesia Angga Priancha; Annisa Elda; Aurizza Amanda; Bambang, Fardy Laksana; Sihombing, Regina
Padjadjaran Law Review Vol. 12 No. 1 (2024): PADJADJARAN LAW REVIEW VOLUME 12 NOMOR 1 JULI 2024
Publisher : PADJADJARAN LAW RESEARCH AND DEBATE SOCIETY

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56895/plr.v12i1.1657

Abstract

Book publishing involves licensing agreements between authors and publishers, often leading to inequitable compensation due to imbalanced bargaining power. This research employs doctrinal legal methodology to analyze and compare copyright licensing norms in both the EU and Indonesia. The EU Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market (“EU CDSM Directives”) prioritizes enhancing copyright protections and enforcing party rights among member states, particularly emphasizing authors' rights to renegotiate contracts under specific conditions. It is proposed that Indonesia should adopt guidelines that prioritize authors' interests in licensing contracts, acknowledging their disadvantaged bargaining position. Implementing such measures through regulations like Presidential Decrees could streamline processes, thus benefiting authors. Additionally, Indonesia should tailor EU CDSM Directives to local contexts, ensuring enhanced protection and fairer contracts for authors.
REFORMING COPYRIGHT FOR THE PARTICIPATIVE WEB: BALANCING CREATOR RIGHTS AND USER CREATIVITY Priancha, Angga
Masalah-Masalah Hukum Vol 54, No 1 (2025): MASALAH-MASALAH HUKUM
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/mmh.54.1.2025.25-36

Abstract

In the era of the “Participative Web,” copyright regulations are increasingly seen as inadequate for fostering creativity, as they hinder the ability of users to remix and create new works from existing ones. This research explores the limitations and exceptions in Indonesia's copyright law, specifically Law Number 28 of 2014, and their relevance in the digital age. It highlights the growing role of internet users not only as consumers but also as active content creators, blurring the lines between creators and consumers. The study argues that current copyright law, with its rigid structure, restricts freedom of expression and cultural development. It proposes that more flexible copyright limitations and exceptions could facilitate creativity in the participative web, benefiting both creators and users. By comparing Indonesian law with the more flexible "fair use" doctrine in the United States, the research suggests that Indonesia could benefit from adopting a more adaptive approach, including the transformative use doctrine. This would allow for more creativity while balancing the rights of copyright holders. Ultimately, the study calls for a reevaluation of Indonesia’s copyright framework to better align with the needs of the participative web.
Co-Authors Annisa Elda Ardia Khairunnisa Aurizza Amanda Bambang, Fardy Laksana Gilang Sephia Sihombing, Regina Tasya Caroline